View Single Post
Old 06-06-2008, 08:26 PM
  #6  
SCRWDbyMGMT
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Agreed. I don't think much of ALPA, and Prater is giving new meaning to the phrase "slow starter", but the results will be the work of DALPA and NWALPA not ALPA national.

Carl
It looks like you are talking about 3 different unions! You make my point exactly! If ALPA is a NATIONAL union, protecting the interests of ALL members from ALL ALPA carriers, Don't you think there ought to be some LEADERSHIP from ALPA NATIONAL in a merger that will effect 15-20% if it's overall membership? NWALPA and DALPA are "chapters" of the greater NATIONAL ALPA, not independent unions!!! ALPA NATIONAL doesn't appear to be doing squat!

If you are happy with totally independent carrier unions, as you stated, then why are we paying dues to a national organization that stands on the sidelines?
SCRWDbyMGMT is offline