I get what you are trying to say. Perhaps your not getting what I'm trying to say.
If the people are on the property they are NOT looked at as hostages. Hence the big push for thr MOU to keep them on property. If we fail on the MOU and they furlough, thats when they become hostages. Hence the education I refered to.
I don't see how people believe the current EB (Farley) views the bottom 300 as "hostages" right now as they are not on the street. They are trying to prevent that from occuring. If they end up on the street, just because we said they would be hostages doesn't diminish our hand any more than it would have been already. UPS would have played that card anyway. This would be a "weakness" of any of the candidates and UPS knows this. Again, they don't need to be "prompted" by past statements. It just stands to reason, thats what the 300 would be. Hostages. Basically, they are just stating a fact.
|