Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Age 65 Rule
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Age 65 Rule Dec 13, 2007: Age 60 is now 65

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2007, 11:04 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vagabond View Post
Statistics have a way of being massaged and manipulated to get almost any desired result. I've seen stats that make some incredible claims.
Did you know that on average, each American has one testicle and one ovary?
Uncle Bose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 10:37 AM   #12 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,026
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vagabond View Post
Statistics have a way of being massaged and manipulated to get almost any desired result. I've seen stats that make some incredible claims. In a court of law, testimony and evidence from statisticians quite often reveal two "truths" and sometimes they are diametrically opposed to each other!

My father was going to retire at 71, but he passed away before he could do so.
Realize Pilots are unique in this.

Generally, as a rule Pilot incomes are at the highest when their individual senority is at it's highest. As a general rule, this is when we are Widebody Capts flying Intl routes and thus we are generally older............

Night domestic freight schedules aside (which suc imho), International flying really puts a Zap on ones circadian sleep cycle disruption. Crossing 4-12 time zones a day and trying to adapt (which is next to impossible) to this takes it's toll, especailly with the increasing optimization of our schedules. The older you are the worse it gets, but generally the older we are we have to flythese schedules to maximize our income for the High 5, so as to maximize our Pensions (deferred income).

I have heard all the rumors of what retiring early will do or what retiring later might do, but I have never seen a real study with Statistics of Just Airline Pilots (let alone us Freight Dawgs) that takes all this into account.

If someone has a link to a study of Airline Pilot longevity I would love to see it............Then again maybe I wouldn't. It might tell me what I already think.
__________________
RedEyE
RedeyeAV8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 10:50 AM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator and Mom
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 2,987
Default

Redeye, did you see the Stanford study in another thread? A member commented that it was lame, but I found it interesting. It was not about longevity per se, but mainly about performance. I have to do some research to see if an actual study on pilot longevity is available.
vagabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 08:29 PM   #14 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
dojetdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DisplaceJet
Posts: 2,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r View Post
Realize Pilots are unique in this.

Generally, as a rule Pilot incomes are at the highest when their individual senority is at it's highest. As a general rule, this is when we are Widebody Capts flying Intl routes and thus we are generally older............

Night domestic freight schedules aside (which suc imho), International flying really puts a Zap on ones circadian sleep cycle disruption. Crossing 4-12 time zones a day and trying to adapt (which is next to impossible) to this takes it's toll, especailly with the increasing optimization of our schedules. The older you are the worse it gets, but generally the older we are we have to flythese schedules to maximize our income for the High 5, so as to maximize our Pensions (deferred income).

I have heard all the rumors of what retiring early will do or what retiring later might do, but I have never seen a real study with Statistics of Just Airline Pilots (let alone us Freight Dawgs) that takes all this into account.

If someone has a link to a study of Airline Pilot longevity I would love to see it............Then again maybe I wouldn't. It might tell me what I already think.
With the last part, I agree. It never ceased to amaze me. Whenever I tell somebody I want to fly for FedEx/UPS they always think they are smart with that classic comeback. "You know, freight pilots die sooner. I've see the study. All that night flying. Not a single FX pilot has live past 70. Don't do it."

I would love to see the actual study that everybody seems to claim to have seen. I'm sure it gets tough, especially when getting older. But what does anybody thinK a senior widebody pilot at a passenger legacy is doing in the 74/777? Day turns to FLL and back all month and for the rest of his career? Please.
dojetdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 07:21 AM   #15 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Self-employed, C-150 CA
Posts: 4,065
Default Secret

Most pilots today have got it made. At their wages they will never be able to retire and will live forever.

Skyhigh
__________________
Pilots are paid for what they will do, not for what they can do.
SkyHigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 05:08 PM   #16 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
aero550's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Citation II
Posts: 315
Default

Has anybody ever seen any studies about radiation exposure from being at high altitudes for a large portion of one's life? I seem to recall hearing/reading about it, but can't remember where.
aero550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 07:34 PM   #17 (permalink)
Moderator and Mom
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 2,987
Default

aero550, I have started a new thread in Pilot Health with some abstracts of studies on the effects of radiation on air crews.
vagabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 07:39 PM   #18 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,026
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vagabond View Post
Redeye, did you see the Stanford study in another thread? A member commented that it was lame, but I found it interesting. It was not about longevity per se, but mainly about performance. I have to do some research to see if an actual study on pilot longevity is available.

No I didn't, but I saw the NASA sleep study done on FedEx pilots in the 80's.
They wired up some of our guys (which included Anal probes) and monitored guys for a week of our Domestic night hub turns (which are real killers).

After the company got the data, they squelched the results because it said what we have been saying for years. Many of our schedules are so onerous that our Pilots are flying very fatigued and too often don't realize it.
It took one of our Pilots sueing FedEx under the Freedom of Information Act to get the results................

The company did it's own internal safety audit about 4 years ago. They hired a professional outfit to come in and do the audit to get a non biased view.(AKA the Ender's report)
Just like the NASA sleep study, the company obviously didn't like what it said because they squelched the results of that audit too. They keep telling us there is no safety problem.

I guess if you keep repeating that enough it must be true.................
There is no safety problem....there is no safety problem...there is no safety problem
__________________
RedEyE

Last edited by RedeyeAV8r : 03-11-2007 at 08:42 AM.
RedeyeAV8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 04:26 PM   #19 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
FliFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: MD11 F/O
Posts: 1,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bose View Post
Did you know that on average, each American has one testicle and one ovary?
Some must thave three and four to average things out. Good thing I don't have any daughters...the dreaded , "beware of the quad-testi guy" talk would be a drag.
FliFast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 07:23 AM   #20 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fogey View Post
My father retired at 67 died at 86. A lot of b.s.
Fogey
Of course these studies include everyone. So your father could not have been 86.
__________________
....it's the only thing.
reCALcitrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/age-65-rule/10264-life-span-vs-retirement-age.html
Posted By For Type Date
Mom's Diary This thread Refback 12-31-2008 09:07 PM
┏水之湄·拈花微笑,隨遇而安.┛ This thread Refback 10-01-2008 06:06 AM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Age 60 under attack! Andy Age 65 Rule 311 04-25-2007 10:47 AM
Airline captains renew effort to up retirement age fireman0174 Major 79 01-07-2007 09:46 AM
Panel Splits on Raising Airline Pilot Retirement Age (Update2) koz2000 Major 43 12-09-2006 10:32 PM
Age 60/65 Compromise Andy Major 25 11-20-2006 08:13 AM
jetBlue Age 60 comment fireman0174 Major 46 11-19-2006 06:49 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7