Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Age 65 Rule
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Age 65 Rule Dec 13, 2007: Age 60 is now 65

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-12-2007, 12:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 349
Default Against Age 65?

If you are against the change in retirement age I urge you to let your Senator know. It takes no time at all. It may not help anything, but at least you didn't just sit back and let it happen.

http://www.senate.gov/general/contac...nators_cfm.cfm
jdt30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 01:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 1,266
Default

I did it a while ago and my senator said that to change it was age discrimination. I should have responded that if age 60 is, then so it age 65. Why is one number more or less discrimination than the other? They are both "age" limits. I think the best we can do now is to delay it as much as possible.?
__________________
-Otto Pilot
Ottopilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 01:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 349
Default

I agree, it probably is a done deal, but why not let the government spend some money researching the safety of age 65?
jdt30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 01:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: CRJ
Posts: 6,419
Default

It's a done deal. Spend your energy on other battles.
rickair7777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 02:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 1,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdt30 View Post
I agree, it probably is a done deal, but why not let the government spend some money researching the safety of age 65?
Because it's my money! Taxes are high enough.
__________________
-Otto Pilot
Ottopilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 02:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
Blue Light Special
 
mcartier713's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CFII
Posts: 528
Default

for those of us who haven't been following the 65 debate that closely, when would it be going into effect? immediately after the senate passes it? (if it does)

and what does that mean for the rest of us who don't already have a job? the most respected route was the wait and build time/get a degree etc etc... will that still be the best plan if all our jobs are going to start disappearing?
mcartier713 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 02:36 PM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 1,266
Default

The senate already voted. It goes to the house next. The pres can veto, but is not expected to. Expect another 5 year delay in your career. It will have the same effect as 9/11 to some. Hiring with stop for 5 years, unless you want to fly for Mesa.
__________________
-Otto Pilot
Ottopilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 02:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
Blue Light Special
 
mcartier713's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CFII
Posts: 528
Default

haha sweet.. so you're saying im screwed? lol
mcartier713 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 02:48 PM   #9 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottopilot View Post
Because it's my money! Taxes are high enough.
Otto, I wasn't very good with my sarcasm. I just want to delay this any way possible through the senate, or all laughing aside a gov study.
Every day that we can delay this is means a few extra pilots will be able to retire.

It actually made it through the house, it is now waiting to go through the senate.
jdt30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 03:16 PM   #10 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: NWA A320
Posts: 1,567
Default

I emailed mine, not that it will do any good.
__________________
NWA
Superpilot92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Age 65 Delay REAL Pilot Age 65 Rule 40 11-05-2007 10:42 AM
Another age 60 pilot's view joel payne Age 65 Rule 62 11-05-2007 10:16 AM
Hiring info for UPS in 2008 BIGBROWNDC8 Cargo 7 10-22-2007 04:33 PM
novel solution to Age 60 debate? Freighter Captain Hangar Talk 1 09-08-2005 12:44 PM
Q and A with Duane Woerth Diesel 10 Hangar Talk 4 07-20-2005 06:22 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7