I think it would be very difficult politically for the FAA to drastically change the medical requirements across the board...
- What is their excuse for doing it? Safety? But they allowed age 65 on the grounds that there would be no reduction in safety...
- While ALPA is seemingly weak, AOPA is not. I think if the two got together (they would), they could shut anything down.
- Due process: If it came down to it, a class-action suit could probably prevail on due process grounds and at least get a grandfather clause for existing medical holders. That's assuming there is no precipitating accident, ie total hull loss due to two incapacitated pilots, both of whom had know health risk factors. If something like that happens, we'll all be getting our arteries MRI'ed on a quarterly basis
