Quote:
Originally Posted by rsmithadx
This is advise from an active dispatcher....
Since all 121 carriers use Ops Specs I think you would be safe instead of saying "published alternate minimums".....you would be safe saying"derived alternate minimums"
I think you will sound more professional.
|
Along the same lines, as far as the TO alternate goes;
Interviewer: "When do you need a TO alternate?"
You: "Whenever the vis is below the lowest available approach minimums prescribed at the departure airport."
Interview: "OK, so the vis is below CATI mins but above CATII mins. We are CATII qualified, do we need a TO alternate?
You: "uh, um, well........."
It has to be at or above the lowest CATI minimum for an approach in use at that airport. If it was at CATII mins and you blasted off and had a component failure that affected your CATII capability, you would not be able to get back in using a CATII approach. An example would be a bird strike that took out one of the pitot/static components or a LOC/GS antennae when 2 are required for a CATII approach.
So, when do you need a TO alternate? When the vis is below the lowest CATI minimum for an approach in use.