Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Airline Pilot Knowledge Base
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Airline Pilot Knowledge Base Share your expertise

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2008, 05:08 PM   #31 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
poorpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: F/O Boeing 737-NGeeeezy
Posts: 38
Default

This thread caught my attention. A couple of months back something similar happened to me. On approach to JFK 04R at 1am, we got a vector that took us off the planned STAR. The vector reduced the distance we would have flown considerably thereby reducing the planned descent profile. The capt just kept on "trucking" not adjusting the descent rate.....we were flying to the FAF and by my calculations were gonna be about 3000' too high. At that point I simply asked if he wanted to adjust speed, or increase rate-of-descent his answer was "we'll be alright just relax" obviously i felt like a retard because i figured he knew something i didn't.

About two or three minutes later, i was doing the rule of three in my head and again came up real high this time. I again told the capt that i thought we were high.....this time he reacted surprised, instantly pulled the speedbrake and started asking for flaps the thing is now we were too fast, in a steep descent and not even close to max flap speed. we crossed the final fix about 2300' above basically diving for the glideslope (full deflection), at which point i suggested a go-around but didn't get a response, 1200' agl and still had only flaps 5 and speed at the limit, vsi indicating about 1700fpm. Again i called go-around-nothing. Now i was feeling a huge knot in my chest.

1000' agl he called for flaps 15 and I basically started recalling the unstable approach rule in our SOP's. He relunctantly initiated the go-around at about 800', the plane started to shake like crazy, it felt horrible.....i looked down and saw the speedbrake still deployed. We were still descending at about 200fpm. I called my plane, firewall thrust, speedbrakes up an started the climb-out as soon as it was stable at 1500' i gave back the plane took back the radios and just pretended as if nothing had happened. This time around he configured way back.....Afterwards he said he screwed up, that he thought he could make it. that he was surprised by the break in his train-of-thought and had forgotten the speedbrakes. that was enough for me to see that he understood the gravity of the matter at hand. The only thing he asked me later was if i ever saw the runway, the truth is that when i took over and called for firewall thrust, we just slightly broke-out at about 600', but no i never had the rwy enviroment insight. He said he would take care of the safety report.

I didn't sleep much that layover. I still think about that night.

any comments would be great.
-PP
poorpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2008, 11:44 PM   #32 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
inky13's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: C172 CFII
Posts: 55
Default

That's a remarkable story PP. Thank God the CA was understanding after the ordeal and seems as though as he learned from it.
inky13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 11:55 AM   #33 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
frozenboxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 Captain
Posts: 884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IFlyEm View Post
For all of you guys that say let the captain continue how do you know s/he isn't incapacitated? You must be interested in becoming a training video for CRM and CFIT. Here is what should take place:
1. Announce minimums.
2. If no response announce "Minimums" again you may tell the Capt to "Go around!"
3. If STILL no response take control of the aircraft and initiate the go around. I wouldn't waste time making a radio call and hope the Capt makes the right choice. You are wasting altitude and time. The Capt ALREADY made the wrong choice by continuing in the first place.

This answer has worked for my interviews with a regional and 2 national airlines and 1 international.

The purpose of the question in the interview is to see if you as an FO will step up and takeover in the interest of safety and BREAK the chain or if you will sit and your hands out of fear of the captain.

If the Capt has a problem with this then see what the CP has to say about it. There are a lot of dead "cowboys" out there and I am damn sure I am not going to let one take me with him.

As the FO you are there for more reasons then to throw the gear. You are an intricate part of the flight crew. As the NFP you are there to monitor the FP and back him up. If they are doing something non-standard, illegal, or unsafe it is YOUR responsibility to act.

Now as a Capt if something is non standard ie on fire, no gas, etc.. then it should be briefed that a landing is going to be completed regardless. But at that point an emergency should have been declared and approach minimum legalities are moot.
execellent post.
fbh
__________________
Rose tints my world and keeps me safe from trouble and pain.
frozenboxhauler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 01:20 PM   #34 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: on the flip side
Posts: 505
Default

If I got asked that question in an interview.... I'd ask just what kind of show they're running?

actually I heard one guy that got asked one of those "what would you do if you caught the CA drunk before a flight?" questions... his reply was... "I don't know...gee I hate to ruin someone's career over that"
he got hired, no kidding
__________________
Thank God we don't get as much government as we pay for!
ryan1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 08:10 PM   #35 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Twin Bonanza (C50ER) Captain
Posts: 198
Default

Crew incapacitation: Two communications rule. The other crewmember will be considered incapacitated if they fail to respond to two consecutive communications.

The problem with that determination is, per some FOMs, you can't let the other guy do anything once you've determined he's incapacitated, so you've suddenly become a single-pilot in whatever you happen to be flying.

Quote:
Originally Posted by poorpilot View Post
snip
Good job. Very well done.

Unless the airplane's on fire or someone's sick...aviate, navigate, communicate, in that order.

I'd say, "Minimums. Missed approach." And wait. One. Two. Three. "Below minimums. Missed approach." One. Two. "My aircraft, thrust go-around, flaps..."

If it gets to the point where I've taken the aircraft...well...

There would be 'interesting' words on the surface.
__________________
We're all in this together.
The Stately Beechcraft Racer - The Twin-Bonanza
SomedayRJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2008, 06:21 PM   #36 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 566
Default

Hate to burst peoples bubble.... but this actually happend to a friend of mine about 4 months ago. CA PF, FO PNF. At MDA & VDP no RNWY. FO called MA... CA kept right on going follwing the FPA on the FMS. FO called MA on the radio... seconds crept by.... FO clicked TOGA buttons and pushed the power up, looked at CA and yelled MISSED APPROACH and did the flow/checklist. CA answered in the affirmative, then promptly blew through the tower assigned missed approach altitude...

True Story.
__________________
Fly The Contract & Nothing More
Mason32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 09:55 AM   #37 (permalink)
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: CL-65 F/O
Posts: 102
Default

This is an interesting thread. I consider myself a very good FO, and very competent in the airplane. However, like some people mentioned in this thread, I don't know that any of that matters when it comes to challenging the captain on something like this. I often feel like FO's don't have a voice in the flight deck. Fortunately I haven't had many situations where I have to strongly disagree with the captain, but one situation made me rethink my policy. While flying at cruise at night, we had weather ahead. Center, the other airplanes in front of us, and I had suggested we go south and deviate. He said "No, we're above it." I said, "I don't think so, and I think we should go south." Well he kept on trucking (he was the PF) and I said "Okay - here we go...." And sure enough at that point we got struck by lightning at F340, and got bumped and knocked around for 15 minutes. Looking back on it, I should have said "I want to go south!" I feel extremely uncomfortable when I have to challege a captain though, but after that I have and will in the future. I just hope I can avoid all situations like that though. Most guys are good enough where I won't find myself in situations like that, but regardless, it's good to have a plan in case it does happen. I'm glad I stumbled upon this thread.
DublinFlyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 09:23 AM   #38 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Iflyfr8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: LJ35 PIC
Posts: 132
Default

As far as the approach goes, don't forget the briefing! If the weather is reported at or above the minimums it's usually always somewhat of a surprise when you arrive not to find the "runway environment". Discuss the approach and maybe even review your missed approached profile. Be explicit as far as what and when you WILL execute a missed approach.

Making a missed approach is a lot easier when you are prepared to do so.
Iflyfr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesaba Street Captains Too Tall Regional 75 10-31-2007 10:21 PM
Updated Regional Hiring Minimums ryane946 Regional 16 10-15-2007 08:48 PM
Continental Equipment System Bid Seniority and DOH CAL EWR Major 35 08-05-2007 08:31 PM
Captain Pay bsh932 Regional 13 07-26-2007 08:09 AM
Rephrased...Sorry...Captain Upgrade Minimums wannabepilot Regional 12 07-09-2007 12:31 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7