Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Airline Pilot Knowledge Base
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Airline Pilot Knowledge Base Share your expertise

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2008, 02:18 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: On Mil Leave
Posts: 809
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cac737 View Post
Again, You are missing the big picture here. According to your way of thinking when you get hired at an airline and they type you right away, are we to believe that everytime you are sole manipulator you are correct to log that time as PIC. You are right, it is legal, but C'MON..... anyone reading this knows what the deal is, and that is what Im referring to when I say relevant time. Are you really going to tell the interview board that you have thousands of hours of experience as a PIC, and what are you going to say when they dig and say well how can you be the PIC when you were a company designated SIC......How utterly ridiculous will you look when you tell them that you are applying flight school rules when presenting your life experience. Not only will they not count it, but it now makes your application false, because in fact you DO NOT HAVE PIC TIME as ANY AIRLINE OR CHARTER OPERATOR sees it. It not a matter of saying well they wont count it and thats it......no......it goes beyond that.

You think that what I am saying is scare tactics....that is so laughable and displays a lack of a comprehensive understanding of just what is it that you are doing. If you bang up an airlplane (doesnt matter why), do you think that the ultimate person whos responsible is the "sole manipulator"? Give me a break. The one and only PIC signs for the aircraft, has the ultimate authority as to it's operation because he/she bears the ultimate responsibility for it. When there is a discusion on the ground or in the air between pilots and MX people about a course of action to take in light of an abnormal or emergency situation, the sole manipulator doesnt make the COMMAND decision, the PILOT IN COMMAND makes that decision. On the big jets, Captains go through more training and checking than FO's do because....yeap, you guessed it they are PIC's and carry greater responsibility. On the B747 FO's do not have to demonstrate 2 engine go-arounds but PIC's do.

If you still quite dont get it then let me further state one last thing. If you are truly a PIC by any and all definitions, then you should have the authority to make any of the above command decisions at any time. Furthermore, 99% of ops specs out there in use, have a section that details how only Captains can make takeoffs or landings under extenuating circumstances like special airports, LLWS, WX mins below a certain value etc etc etc......if FO's out there fit the definition of a PIC they wouldnt be handicapped the way they are.

Scare tactics? I dont think so. As you can see flying 135 or 121 presents a whole new set of things you need to think about that is not covered under part 61 or any FBO or flight school. The interview board doesnt give a rats ass about your sole manipulator time at the local FBO in puddle jumpers or at the controls of an airplane under the watchful eye of a captain, they care about your experience making command decisions in a jet aircraft under the burden of the responsibilities of a PILOT IN COMMAND. That's why you dont log PIC time.
You're going to say the same thing over and over, so will I. Your App is not false if you add the times the way they want on it. You can log PIC properly in your logbook and put said Airline's definition on your App...totally proper in either case.

In any case, I think you're confusing PIC with Turbine PIC, and on most applications it clearly states that the time they're looking for is when you have signed for the jet...well, then you give them that time. But to suggest that you have discredited yourself because you and your buddy shared a 172 once in a while and both logged PIC (legal), or that you logged PIC while flying with your CFI (which every CFI has done in my logbook), is putting a lot of undue confusion in people's heads. Also, these days most airlines are getting SIC Type ratings for their FO's, so FO's cant log PIC anyways since they don't hold the appropriate rating.

Long story short...don't be scared to log things properly. If an airline wants to sort your hours differently, then sort them differently, id doesn't mean you have to make corrections in your logbook. Most Airlines only care about TURBINE PIC anyways, they won't give a Rat's @$$ if you logged sole manipulator in a piston or not.

Side note: In what seems to be a contradiction, Airlines DO count an AF Pilot's "Primary" time as Turbine PIC...much of which was "sole manipulator" SIC time, as Air Force records keep no records as to who was the Aircraft Commander of record in a logbook.

Last edited by blastoff : 04-15-2008 at 02:25 PM.
blastoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 02:33 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: On Mil Leave
Posts: 809
Default

Clearing The Air On Logging PIC Time

by Bob Black
AIR, Inc. Military Correspondent
Reprinted from the Airline Pilot Job Monthly Newsletter
AIR, Inc. counselors handle dozens of calls each week from military pilots confused about transferring military flight time to airline job applications. Due to the increased number of questions we receive about flight time and in particular the logging of Pilot-in-Command (PIC) time, we felt it was time to devote an article to this issue. What we came up with will negate some of the old ideas in logging flight time which we have suggested throughout our publications. We are now recommending that you use this article as the new guideline for documenting flight time for the purpose of your resumes and employment applications.

Some of the common questions which are being asked include: Exactly when is a military pilot allowed to log PIC time? Will the airlines give pilots full credit for the PIC time they log? What about instructor time?

We'd all like to maximize the pilot-in-command time we record in our log books and take to our interviews, but when we try to define PIC time, we run into the source of all this confusion: both the definition and intent of PIC time differ between the FAA, military, and the airlines. Let's take a look at the differences. Unfortunately, the airlines generally adhere to the strictest interpretation of the logging of actual PIC time. We'll start with the FAA.

FAR Part 61:51 deals with pilot logbooks and cites the instances in which pilots can log pilot-in-command flight time. These are:
1.only that flight time during which [the] pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated, OR
2.when the pilot is the sole occupant of the aircraft, OR
3.when acting as pilot-in-command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required (by type certification or flight regulations).
Additionally, airline transport pilots and certificated instructor pilots may log as pilot-in-command time that flight time during which they act as a pilot-in-command or instructor, respectively.

Note the FAA's intent in defining pilot-in-command time, and in requiring pilots to record PIC in their logbooks, is to allow pilots to document aeronautical training and experience used to obtain specific certificates or ratings. For instance, airmen need 100 hours of pilot-in-command time to obtain a Commercial certificate, and 250 hours PIC for the Airline Transport Pilot certificate. Such flight time must be logged and presented as evidence in qualifying for these certificates. The FAA never set our to establish or document airline hiring criteria.

Remember the five specific instances in which FAR Part 61:51 allows pilots to log PIC time: as sole manipulator of the controls, as sole aircraft occupant, when acting as pilot-in-command of a mandated multi-pilot aircraft, as an ATP acting as pilot-in-command, or as an instructor when giving instruction. This section of the FAR's seems to allow for the possibility that two pilots in the same aircraft can be logging PIC time simultaneously. Example: a commuter captain (the designated PIC) monitoring the radios while his copilot flies the airplane (sole manipulator of the controls).

Many military pilots have used this situation to record PIC time while flying as a copilot. In fact, it's quite common to find copilots logging half or more of their flight time as PIC, and FAR Part 61:51 allows it! Let's take a look now at how the military addresses the question of PIC time.

The Air Force, Navy and Marines divide flight time into these categories:
1.Primary (USAF) or First Pilot (USN, USMC) time, which designates hands-on flight time during which the pilot is actively controlling the aircraft. This matches the FAA's "sole manipulator" definition of PIC.
2.Secondary (USAF) or Copilot (USN, USMC) time, during which the pilot is assisting the other pilot actually flying the aircraft. The FAA calls this second-in-command time.
Neither of these categories applies to crew specialty rank, or designation as pilot-in-command. In other words, a C-141 aircraft commander logs Primary time when he is flying the airplane, and Secondary time when his copilot flies. In actual practice, most military pilots in large multi-pilot aircraft split Primary and Secondary (or First Pilot and Copilot) flight time evenly between the two crew members, regardless of who actually did the flying.

(Army aviators: your military flight time designators, such as PI, PC, IE, MP, etc. are much more crew-specialty specific. Be sure your personal logbook reflects hands-on-flight time, and not just your crew position.)

Keeping in mind the FAA's "sole manipulator" definition of PIC, military pilots are justified in logging Primary or First Pilot time as PIC, even before they've upgraded to aircraft commander status. Using the FAA's "pilot-in-command" definition, designated aircraft commanders are also justified in logging both Primary and Secondary time as PIC. Finally, FAR Part 61:51 allows designated military instructor pilots to log all instruction time as PIC, even if they don't sit at the controls.

The good news here is the FAA seems to be letting an awful lot of PIC time build up in the logbooks of our nation's military pilots. Almost everybody gets to log some time as PIC -- copilots, first pilots aircraft commanders, instructors, etc. The bad news is, the airlines aren't buying it. Let us explain.

In most cases, when the airlines talk about PIC flight time, what they really mean is captain flight time, the kind you get when you sit in the left seat, sign for the aircraft, make all the final decisions and wear four bars on your shoulder. In FAA parlance this is "designated pilot-in-command" time, and the military calls it "aircraft commander" time. This definition of PIC refers to who you are in the cockpit, not what you're doing with the controls.

Some airline applications are very clear about this when asking you to list your PIC and SIC hours. Look at UPS' and TWA's application and you'll see they define PIC as quoted from FAR 61:51.

United Airlines' application states: "PIC means you were totally responsible for aircraft and crew." Alaska's States "PIC means designated 'In Command' in flight". America West's flight time grid has separate headings for Captain and First Officer with the added instruction that Captain time is when you were assigned and designated PIC by the operator or owner of the airplane. American Airline's headings are Aircraft Commander, Captain or PIC, and Copilot. Clearly, these airlines are not using the "sole manipulator" criteria from FAR Part 61 to define PIC time.

Other airline applications are more ambiguous. FedEx and Northwest simply ask for PIC and SIC. Southwest Airlines uses familiar Navy terms: "1st Pilot" and "Copilot." With so many definitions and usages floating around, it's hardly surprising that so many pilots are confused when trying to reconcile their military flight records, pilot logbooks, and airline job applications. If they're concerned about discrepancies, they should be; no pilot wants to get in the hot seat at an interview while trying to explain why his flying hours don't seem to add up. Perhaps in the future the interested parties -- the FAA, the military services and the airlines -- can agree on common terms and definitions for logging flight time and experience. In the meantime, here are some suggestions.

Keep a master pilot logbook that reflects the FAA's allowed usage's of pilot-in-command flight time. Enter your flight time in the appropriate PIC, SIC, or Other columns as determined by your military branch's designations of Primary, Secondary, First Pilot, Copilot, Instructor, etc. In addition, annotate in the remarks column your status as designated aircraft commander, copilot, first pilot, etc., for that flight.

Evaluate the allowed PIC or SIC criteria as defined on the application of the individual airline you're applying to. Again, most airlines intend for you to log PIC time for only those flights on which you were the designated pilot-in-command, regardless of who actually flew the airplane. AIR, Inc. members can contact our counselors or the airline recruiting office if you have questions regarding a specific airline.

List your PIC and SIC time on the application based on the airline's definition of these terms. This may result in different totals for different airlines, or differences between a given application, your military fight records, and your pilot logbook. If questioned about these differences during an interview, simply indicate you followed guidance in FAR Part 61:51 for logging flight time, but used the airline's own criteria for completing the application. It should be noted, however, that you could drive yourself crazy trying to conform to each and every airlines' different way of doing things. You don't have much choice for the employment application, but for your resumes we suggest that you prepare only one resume using the most conservative criteria for listing flight times.

(Pay particular attention to Instructor categories. This is another area where the FAR's allow more than one pilot to log PIC time simultaneously, but the airlines may ask you to separate your instructor flight time from the rest of your PIC time. If so, subtract your instructor hours from PIC time, but don't panic! You're getting credit for all of it. Double-check your flight time totals. If your category totals add up to more than you really have, you've made a mistake somewhere.)

For some of you, this will result in a shocking reduction in the amount of PIC time you thought you were going to get credit for. What the FAA giveth, the airline taketh away. Before you lose hope, however, remember this: as a seasoned military aviator, you are a known quantity at an airline interview. If your career has progressed normally from copilot to aircraft commander and, perhaps, on to instructor and evaluator, you are competitive in today's job market. The airlines know who you are, and they're looking for you. The loss of a few hundred hours of PIC time logged as a copilot will not significantly reduce your standing in the job race.

We've looked at how three key entities -- the FAA, the military and the airlines-- differ in their definitions for important categories of flight time. Two standards, those of the FAA and the military, are easily reconciled, and can be logged quite compatibly. A third, the "designated pilot-in-command" standard used by the airlines, requires some closer scrutiny, and a change in the way you transfer information from your logbook to an airline application. Using the steps outlined, you should be able to present accurate information to your prospective employer, backed up with military fight records and a correctly annotated FAA-approved logbook.
Editors note: Some of the issues pertaining to the logging of PIC time presented in this article also have a civilian application. According to the FAR's it would seem that you can legally log PIC when you are sole manipulator of the controls. Keep in mind that as a first officer, when flying your leg of a trip, the company you are flying for gives you credit towards PIC time for preparation towards your eventual upgrade. However, the airlines you are applying to will not count this time as actual PIC since you haven't been checked out as PIC in that airplane. Many applicants have lost the interview battle trying to argue this point with the recruiter.
blastoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 02:46 PM   #13 (permalink)
Rated X
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surefire View Post
Did some digging around on this topic, but didn't quite find a thread(s) that addresses my situation:

A) I'm employed at a 135 operator at the rank of First Officer. Our ops include straightforward 135 charter, as well as "managed aircraft" that are crewed and flown under Part 91 for private owners.

B) I hold an ATP and have full type ratings (not SIC) on two types of aircraft. I fly both 135 charters *and* the 91 trips on the managed airplanes.

C) I am 135 current and am signed off on the testing requirements for a PIC (current 293, 297, and 299), but my company has not yet designated me as a Captain for any of the 135 flights.

D) I have been flying my legs as sole manipulator (left seat)

Question: For my pilot logbook, can I log the flights I described above as PIC time? Pilots and ops people with whom I have discussed this say the 91 legs should be ok to log as PIC, but I am getting differing opinions on the 135 legs. Again, my interest is what is accurate and legal to put in my logbook. I already know the airlines won't go for any PIC time where I am not the Captain of record.

Thanks in advance for some intelligent discourse on this question.

didn't read thru the whole thread, and no matter... but here is you answer:

From the FAA's standpoint, you are able to log PIC if you're type rated and flying he aircraft.

From the rest of the world (read employers), the only PIC is the guy signed for the airplane... if for example on a 91 leg you're flying but the other guy is signed for the plane (read responsible ultimately) .. he's PIC.



A good similar example if when I flew MD11 as IRO (International Relief Officer).. I was PIC Type rated, and check from the left seat.. BUT. the PIC, was the captain, and even when he was in the back sleeping and I was in the left seat.. I was no able to log PIC as per most employers.. but I was as per the FAA.
__________________
Total perfection: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6txOvK-mAk

Last edited by CE750 : 04-15-2008 at 02:53 PM.
CE750 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 06:48 PM   #14 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: B747
Posts: 120
Red face

But to suggest that you have discredited yourself because you and your buddy shared a 172 once in a while and both logged PIC (legal), or that you logged PIC while flying with your CFI (which every CFI has done in my logbook), is putting a lot of undue confusion in people's heads.



No, what you describe is totally acceptable and it's how you further your time, because the FAA rules allow you to log it as such in the building of your time under part 61. totally fine.

what i take issue with is when kids get into the right seat of something bigger whether its a Tprop or a jet at the local FBO and start logging PIC time because thev'ye been doing it in the C-172.
So now when you go to interview and you list XXX hours in a citation as PIC even tho you were sole manipulator ...is what i call disengenuous, because you are no longer just putzing around in a 172 anymore, what you are now doing is different and is transport in nature....FOR HIRE.

guys/gals do whatever you want, just know that when you sit across from a chief pilot during an interview, he/she is going to want to know about your time in command of a plane as it relates to jet transport, trying to pass off some sole manipulator time as pic time just simply wastes his time because your time in a 172 with your buddy however legal, just is not relevant to what they are looking for. You can put it in there in the hopes that they accept it and i guess in some cases it has been accepted or overlooked.
Best of luck to you all in your endeavor to get "hired" where ever it is that you want to go, just be cautious in your eagerness to "build time", ultimately any BS gets weeded out in the simulator.
cac737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 07:49 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 742 Driver
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CE750 View Post
A good similar example if when I flew MD11 as IRO (International Relief Officer).. I was PIC Type rated, and check from the left seat.. BUT. the PIC, was the captain, and even when he was in the back sleeping and I was in the left seat.. I was no able to log PIC as per most employers.. but I was as per the FAA.

Lets take that a little farther. I have an upcoming trip that is an augmented crew. Two Capts, one f/o, two f/es. As a Capt, do I log the whole trip or only the time I am in the seat?
Thedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 08:01 PM   #16 (permalink)
Rated X
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thedude View Post
Lets take that a little farther. I have an upcoming trip that is an augmented crew. Two Capts, one f/o, two f/es. As a Capt, do I log the whole trip or only the time I am in the seat?
With two CA's I would argue that it's the time you're acting that you should log, unless your company has it where the paperwork or release shows only one PIC for the entire trip, which would not seem legal... what does your release say is the PIC?
__________________
Total perfection: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6txOvK-mAk
CE750 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 11:19 PM   #17 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 742 Driver
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CE750 View Post
With two CA's I would argue that it's the time you're acting that you should log, unless your company has it where the paperwork or release shows only one PIC for the entire trip, which would not seem legal... what does your release say is the PIC?
Why would the trip not be legal if it only shows one PIC's name for the entire trip. Isn't that the whole point of an augmented crew, to exceed 12 hrs of flying. It happens over the weekend and I assume that only my name will appear on the flight plan.
Thedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 11:31 PM   #18 (permalink)
Rated X
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,224
Default

Good question.. I think the premise behind the heavy crew is to indeed to lengthen the flight time to 12, but I don't see how it can be legal for one PIC to be in charge the entire time, as he must get rest.. but then we only did a couple of those when I was flying long haul and I never paid attention to whether the release had two or just one PIC listed as I was always acting as an FO then.. we never had FE's on the 11, so it was usually 2 CA's and 2 FO's.. but for the most part the 11 operated with 1 CA, an FO and an IRO (PIC type rated FO), and we could fly up to 12 hours.

In the end, the question has to be asked... if there were to be an emergency.. who would be in ultimate command of the flight.. it's usually the senior captain at most airlines, but not always. I'd clarify it if I were you.
__________________
Total perfection: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6txOvK-mAk
CE750 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone trained at Ari Ben Aviator? slapnut Flight Schools 22 03-24-2008 12:41 PM
logging pic j3gibbon Flight Training 7 02-25-2008 03:36 AM
Safety Pilot Time Logging moelost Flight Training 3 11-15-2007 01:32 PM
Turbine SIC vs Recip PIC beebopbogo Cargo 2 10-26-2007 11:59 AM
PIC Time for Airline Applications Happy Camper Major 6 02-14-2006 02:04 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7