Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Airline Pilot Knowledge Base
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Airline Pilot Knowledge Base Share your expertise

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2008, 07:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 9
Default "ILS or Localizer 23R" vs "ILS 23R"

I've been trying to ask everyone possible and nobody has given me an answer that isn't a guess.

Some approach procedures are titled, ex: "ILS or Localizer 23R" and some are just titled, ex: "ILS 23R". The title that only says "ILS" still has localizer only minimums. What's the difference????

-Chris M.
vtx531 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2008, 08:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Weekends Off? Yeah Right
 
Squawk_5543's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: SF340
Posts: 824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vtx531 View Post
I've been trying to ask everyone possible and nobody has given me an answer that isn't a guess.

Some approach procedures are titled, ex: "ILS or Localizer 23R" and some are just titled, ex: "ILS 23R". The title that only says "ILS" still has localizer only minimums. What's the difference????

-Chris M.
If the approach says ILS or Localizer then you have the option to shoot the approach as either a precision (ILS) or a non-precision (Localizer) approach. An ILS approach has LOC only mins so that if the glide slope is out of service an approach can still be made, just to higher mins.
Squawk_5543 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 09:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain
Posts: 90
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squawk_5543 View Post
If the approach says ILS or Localizer then you have the option to shoot the approach as either a precision (ILS) or a non-precision (Localizer) approach. An ILS approach has LOC only mins so that if the glide slope is out of service an approach can still be made, just to higher mins.
You are correct, of course, but you didn't address the question asked.

I don't know the answer to the question asked.

Joe
joepilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 12:03 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Brown hobo, ANC or bust
Posts: 3,009
Default

Sounds like he answered it to me.
__________________
Will fly for...$
Slice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 12:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: DHC-8 CA
Posts: 55
Default

I can't quite answer the question. But I can tell you this... The plates used to always say just "ILS". A few years ago they started adding the "ILS or LOC" when the new revisions came out. I don't know that anything other than the name has changed because you could always use the LOC minimums even when it just said "ILS"

Last edited by rustypigeon : 09-02-2008 at 02:30 PM.
rustypigeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2008, 05:19 PM   #6 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 13
Default

Here is the way that I understand this: It used to be that an ILS approach chart only said ILS 23R and had glide slope minimums and glideslope out minimums. Most people referred to an approach with the glideslope out as a Localizer approach. The ATIS would refer to a Localizer approach, and the controller would clear you for a Localizer approach. But the poor pilot from a foreign country looking through his Jeppesen charts could not find a chart entitled LOC 23R. Most of us in the US knew that the ILS approach plate was the one to use, but not everyone did. In the interest of standardization and making it easier for the worldwide pilots, all ILS approaches are being changed to ILS or LOC 23R, so that it is more clear to everyone.
carlwag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 10:45 AM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
DamonMeyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Ramen-eating duck driver
Posts: 223
Default

The reason for the naming is to allow planes without the ILS (GS) to be cleared for (and fly) the approach?
DamonMeyer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2008, 05:50 PM   #8 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Jet-A Burner
Posts: 433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DamonMeyer View Post
The reason for the naming is to allow planes without the ILS (GS) to be cleared for (and fly) the approach?

So why are there LOC mins on the ILS only chart then.....
__________________
Fly The Contract & Nothing More
Mason32 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2008, 01:07 AM   #9 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 160
Default

The title of an approach is the equipment required to shoot the final approach... if "cleared for the ILS" then you should use glidepath and localizer guidance... if "cleared for the localizer" then you should use MDA as your lowest altitude... if you are getting a "usable GS" then its your option to use a constant descent profile to hit VDP above the MDA... hope this helps.
ugleeual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2008, 03:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Texandrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 75
Default

This was covered about a year and a half ago. A search would have had trouble finding it because of all the dashes in the title:

ILS vs. ILS or LOC approaches....???

It seems that most civilians don't do it, but it is perfectly legal to fly a localizer if you are cleared to "Fly the ILS..." Military pilots do it daily. Over and over again, ad nauseum. However, not the other way around. If you are cleared the "Localizer approach..." you cannot fly the ILS because the gs is not part of the localizer approach.
Texandrvr is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7