Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Airline Pilot Knowledge Base
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Airline Pilot Knowledge Base Share your expertise

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2009, 08:53 AM   #11 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheDashRocks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DHC-8 CA Furloughed
Posts: 240
Default

I concur with what others have already said about declaring an emergency if PIC and ATC cannot reach a quick agreement about a course of action. Try to concisely present the controller with workable options. If none work for ATC, an emergency will probably need to be delared.

Pilots are tempted to speculate about a controller's workload and motivation. Unless you are looking over the controller's shoulder, hear all landline communication, and hear all coordination from controllers seated near by, you as a pilot will not know with certainty what the controller is dealing with. You cannot tell just by voice traffic on the frequency.

WX deviations can be very stressful for controllers. They mean that a primary means of separation is no longer available; Planes cannot be assigned headings or courses that insure seperation from adjacent aircraft. Increased use of altitude separation is used, climbs or descents may be delayed. This is especially true in terminal areas with multiple arrival and departure routes. The increased stress can cause a controller to sound angry on the frequency. I will not say that pilots are never placed in the "penalty box". I will say that it happens much less than pilots think.

The Dash Whisperer
29 years of Tower, enroute, and approach ATC experience

Last edited by TheDashRocks : 10-24-2009 at 07:40 PM. Reason: speling
TheDashRocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 12:31 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
slipped's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
If your question was in response to my comment - then yes.
I tell them that I need another heading (give them one if you can) to keep you clear of that weather. If they are unable to do that - then yes - I will have to declare an emergency to remain clear.
No...I would not "just go ahead and do it". I would work very hard with ATC for options which will work for both of us prior to playing that last safety card.

USMCFLYR
OK, but would you say "I need 060 OR im declaring an emergency"
__________________
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.
T.J.
slipped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 01:17 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: F/A-18 FRS IP
Posts: 3,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slipped View Post
OK, but would you say "I need 060 OR im declaring an emergency"
Well...since I'm no seer I don't exactly what I would say - but the end result would be something along the lines of "ATC - I need a turn to (insert specific hdg here or at a minimum a general turn) or else I'm going to have to declare an emergency"

What exactly are you trying to get at here with the questions?
Are you trying to figure out how to approach the situation?
Specific wording in really kind of pointless. It is the overall purpose of working with ATC to keep yourself out of trouble, and of actions that can be taken as a last resort to safely complete your flight.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 05:38 PM   #14 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
slipped's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Well...since I'm no seer I don't exactly what I would say - but the end result would be something along the lines of "ATC - I need a turn to (insert specific hdg here or at a minimum a general turn) or else I'm going to have to declare an emergency"

What exactly are you trying to get at here with the questions?
Are you trying to figure out how to approach the situation?
Specific wording in really kind of pointless. It is the overall purpose of working with ATC to keep yourself out of trouble, and of actions that can be taken as a last resort to safely complete your flight.

USMCFLYR
I am trying to figure out when giving an ultimatum, how someone would word it tactfully and professionally. I guess I just feel awkward pushing ATC around, not that I wouldnt do it.
__________________
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.
T.J.
slipped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 06:13 PM   #15 (permalink)
Moderator
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: F/A-18 FRS IP
Posts: 3,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slipped View Post
I am trying to figure out when giving an ultimatum, how someone would word it tactfully and professionally. I guess I just feel awkward pushing ATC around, not that I wouldnt do it.
I think you are looking at it the wrong way - or worried about things that you shouldn't be worried about. Meaning - it if comes down to ATC trying to tell you something that you feel is going to be UNSAFE - and you feel that it is SO UNSAFE that you need to deviate from instructions - then you do it. You are the PIC - you are the guy sitting in the aircraft whos aircraft is going into that Level ? storm - it is your butt on the line.
That being said - before you take that action - you had better be darn sure and in my opinion have tried everything possible to have worked within the system before going off on your own. How you say it if it were to come to this is really beside the pint.

Think of it like this Slipped.
Scenario - you are taking off out of LAS or ABQ and ATC levels you off at an altitude and on an assigned heading that will take you right into a mountain!
You ask for a climb or turn to avoid the ground. They refuse. What are you going to do???

USMCFLYR

Last edited by USMCFLYR : 10-25-2009 at 06:11 PM.
USMCFLYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 09:38 PM   #16 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 1,037
Default SA check

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Scenario - you are taking off out of LAS or ABQ and ATC levels you off at an altitude and on an assigned heading that will take you right into a mountain!
That was a classic simulator "setup". The IP would give you exactly Cat I wx, so you think "Ah, the ol' V-1 cut" -- but the engines run fine, so you think "He's probably going to give us a flap problem, or maybe a hydraulic leak." Nope. Then he simulates the F/A calling about something or other, and "fails" your radio. He wants to see how long you continue to drive toward the mountains before doing something about it.

Last edited by USMCFLYR : 10-24-2009 at 10:05 PM.
tomgoodman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:17 PM   #17 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
slipped's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
I think you are looking at it the wrong way - or worried about things that you shouldn't be worried about. Meaning - it if comes down to ATC trying to tell you something that you feel is going to be UNSAFE - and you feel that it is SO UNSAFE that you need to deviate from instructions - then you do it. You are the PIC - you are the guy sitting in the aircraft whos aircraft is going into that Level ? storm - it is your butt on the line.
That being said - before you take that action - you had better be darn sure and in my opinion have tried everything possible to have worked within the system before going off on your own. How you say it if it were to come to this is really beside the pint.

Think of it like this Slipped.
Scenario - you are taking off out of LAS or ABQ and ATC levels you off at an altitude and on an assigned heading that will take you right into a mountain!
You ask for a climb or turn to aviod the ground. They refuse. What are you going to do???

USMCFLYR

OK, when you put it like that I understand, thanks.
__________________
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.
T.J.
slipped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 04:50 PM   #18 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 1,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkiBum112 View Post
Moderate to severe turbluence is questionable. Moderate to severe to who? I have been doing this a while now, and I have only had what I would consider severe once, but that was when I was a new FO, so that is questionable too. Also, depending on the conditions, if you were in fact experiencing severe turbulence, then climbing four thousand feet may not have made a difference. I wouldn't declare in an emergency in that event.
.
The FAA does have definitions to help classify and describe the different levels of turbulence. Previous to this, they used to say in Moderate, it was difficult to read the instruments. In severe, it was impossible.

Light Chop.
Slight, rapid, and somewhat rhythmic bumpiness without appreciable changes in altitude or attitude.

Light Turbulence.
Slight, erratic changes in altitude and/or attitude. Occupants may feel a slight strain against seatbelts. Unsecured objects may be displaced slightly. Food service may be conducted and little to no difficulty is encountered in walking.

Moderate Chop.
Rapid bumps or jolts without appreciable changes in aircraft altitude or attitude.

Moderate Turbulence.
Changes in altitude and/or attitude occur but the aircraft remains in positive control at all times. It usually causes variations in indicated airspeed. Occupants feel definite strain against seatbelts. Unsecured objects are dislodged. Food service and walking are difficult.

Severe.
Large, abrupt changes in altitude and/or attitude. Usually causes large variations in indicated airspeed. Aircraft may be momentarily out of control. Occupants are forced violently against seatbelts. Unsecured objects are tossed about. Food service and walking are impossible.

Extreme.
Aircraft is violently tossed about and is practically impossible to control. May cause structural damage.



KC10 FATboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 06:15 PM   #19 (permalink)
Moderator
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: F/A-18 FRS IP
Posts: 3,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
The FAA does have definitions to help classify and describe the different levels of turbulence. Previous to this, they used to say in Moderate, it was difficult to read the instruments. In severe, it was impossible.

Extreme.


Aircraft is violently tossed about and is practically impossible to control. May cause structural damage.


Once in awhile I get asked how "is the ride".....I don't have much to compare it too Extreme huh? Sounds like a good flight!
Classifying turbulence - and braking action too - can be a tricky call and I take any of that information with a large grain of salt.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EDC vs. Release Time SilkySmooth Regional 18 09-17-2009 05:44 AM
Join ATC in the fight against cancer! AUS_ATC Pilot Health 0 07-19-2009 08:36 PM
DAL ATL 767 Pilots flying to NBO...ATC Help atpcliff Major 18 06-03-2009 11:56 AM
Live ATC Links and YouTube KC10 FATboy Aviation Law 6 02-24-2009 11:43 AM
USPS News - More Bad News for Purple JNYVEGAS Cargo 34 01-30-2009 10:21 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7