Search
Notices

Merger and the DOJ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2016, 03:39 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Default Merger and the DOJ

I don't see why it wouldn't be approved but this is an interesting article if you guys haven't seen it yet.

Alaska Air?s Virgin Bid Seen Facing Concerns Near Deadline - Bloomberg


Alaska Air’s Virgin Bid Seen Facing Concerns Near Deadline
David McLaughlin
damclaugh
Mary Schlangenstein
Schlangenstein
September 22, 2016 — 3:58 PM EDT Updated on September 22, 2016 — 5:54 PM EDT
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Airlines said to pitch merger to top antitrust officials
Justice Department has Sept. 30 deadline for acting on deal
Alaska Air Group Inc. and Virgin America Inc. pleaded their case for their $2.6 billion merger to top Justice Department officials last week, according to people familiar with the matter, an indication that negotiations are in their final stages over whether the government allows the deal to proceed.
The airlines met with antitrust division chief Renata Hesse and other officials conducting the review to address government concerns that the combination could hurt competition, said one of the people. Such top-level meetings usually signal that the antitrust division has worries about a merger that could lead to a lawsuit to block it.
Time is running short for the government to act. The airlines have agreed not to close until Sept. 30, effectively setting a deadline for the Justice Department to give a nod to the deal or seek to block it.

The spread between the offer price for Virgin America and its share price rose to $3.80, the highest level since the deal was announced, showing that investors Wednesday became more worried about the deal’s prospects.
Virgin America fell the most in seven months Thursday, the biggest decline since before the carrier agreed to be acquired by Alaska. Shares dropped 4.4 percent to $53.20 at the close of trading in New York.

Effective Competitor
It was unclear whether the companies have offered to sell assets to resolve the department’s concerns or whether they may agree to extend their deadline. The airlines argue that by combining they will be a more effective competitor to the biggest carriers in the U.S., one of the people said.
"We still expect the merger to close in the fourth quarter, as we always have,” said Dave Arnold, a spokesman for Virgin America. Spokespeople for Alaska and the Justice Department declined to comment.

Alaska’s agreement to buy Virgin America, announced in April, would extend a round of consolidation that has shrunk the number of carriers in the U.S. airline industry since 2005, leaving the top four operators controlling 80 percent of the market. This is the first substantial airline merger since the Justice Department sued to block US Airways Group’s takeover of American Airlines in 2013, a case that ultimately settled after the carriers agreed to sell airport assets to low-fare competitors. The government’s decision on this tie-up will be closely watched for its view on the current state of competition in the airline industry.
Airline Concentration
Bill Baer, who preceded Hesse as chief of the antitrust division and who still oversees it as the Justice Department’s No. 3 official, is keeping a close eye on concentration in the airline industry. He started an investigation last year into possible improper collusion between carriers over seating capacity, a crucial factor in determining fares. He also sued United Continental Holdings Inc., seeking to block its acquisition of takeoff-and-landing rights from Delta Air Lines Inc. at New Jersey’s Newark Liberty International Airport, saying the deal threatened to raise fares. United dropped its plan to buy the slots.
Alaska Air argues the Virgin America takeover is largely complementary and would expand its route network out of Washington, Oregon and Alaska by adding important business centers of Los Angeles and San Francisco as well as rights to operate at New York’s LaGuardia and Kennedy, New Jersey’s Newark Liberty and Washington’s Reagan National airports.
Stiff Competition
Cross-country routes between New York and California are among the most lucrative in the domestic industry. With the merger, Alaska hopes to become the carrier of choice in California, where it faces stiff competition from Southwest Airlines Co. and United Continental Holdings Inc.
Antitrust regulators may try to ensure two gates acquired by Virgin America at Dallas Love Field to help clear the way for the US Airways-American tie-up remain in the hands of a low-cost carrier after the merger.
In May 2014, Virgin America beat out larger rival Southwest to secure the right to sublease the gates at Love Field, a small airport close to downtown Dallas that’s favored by some business travelers.
Virgin America shifted its flights to Love Field from Dallas-Fort Worth International, where it competed against American Airlines. Love Field is dominated by Southwest, which currently is embroiled in a legal battle with Delta Air Lines Inc. over access to gate space at the airport.
Virgin America Chief Executive Officer David Cush said Monday at an aviation conference that the federal review of the merger is “going according to plan” and the two airlines still expect to complete it in the fourth quarter.
“There have been no bumps in the road,” he said.
Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 09-23-2016, 04:33 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

I'd say this merger creates MORE competition for the "Big Three" not less. More choices for the consumer as well. I'm pretty sure Alaska's Legal Dept can make a convincing case to that effect.
Packrat is offline  
Old 09-23-2016, 08:44 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Seems Virgin/Alaska are delaying and giving more time to the DOJ and won't close as previously thought:

Alaska, Virgin Said to Delay Deal to Give U.S. More Review Time - Bloomberg
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-23-2016, 11:48 AM
  #4  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

I'm not surprised the DOJ is up in arms (they throw a fit all the time regarding mergers), but I can't see anything realistically stopping this merger. I suspect the DOJ will have some sort of restrictions on what AS can do with the DAL gates (not let them get to AA, DL, UA, WN) but the DOT will approve the merger.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 09-23-2016, 12:10 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Posts: 3,150
Default

"I think they're going "OH$#!^" what the hell have we done... "

"jetblue was supposed to make another bigger offer right?!?! We can't afford to spend 4billion dollars on 60 planes and paper assets... $#!^ $#!^... *** are we supposed to do with this now... $#!^"

just making this up of course I have no clue.
CaptCoolHand is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 03:21 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Captain B-737
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
"I think they're going "OH$#!^" what the hell have we done... "

"jetblue was supposed to make another bigger offer right?!?! We can't afford to spend 4billion dollars on 60 planes and paper assets... $#!^ $#!^... *** are we supposed to do with this now... $#!^"

just making this up of course I have no clue.
Exactly. Hopefully Tilden pulls the plug on this one.
EskimoJoe is offline  
Old 09-24-2016, 05:36 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 784
Default

I don't think he will
OCCP is offline  
Old 09-25-2016, 08:59 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand View Post
"I think they're going "OH$#!^" what the hell have we done... "

"jetblue was supposed to make another bigger offer right?!?! We can't afford to spend 4billion dollars on 60 planes and paper assets... $#!^ $#!^... *** are we supposed to do with this now... $#!^"

just making this up of course I have no clue.

Well considering nearing the end of the bidding war Alaska told Jetblue that whatever they bid Alaska would beat it. So I'd say you are not correct.
AJ Crowley is offline  
Old 09-28-2016, 11:25 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: CA
Posts: 1,211
Default

Originally Posted by AJ Crowley View Post
Well considering nearing the end of the bidding war Alaska told Jetblue that whatever they bid Alaska would beat it. So I'd say you are not correct.
That would be an awfully foolish thing to announce. At this point I don't think anybody thinks Alaska got a sweet deal, if anything they got bid up.
Softpayman is offline  
Old 09-28-2016, 01:08 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 384
Default

No.. AS made its final bid effective on time. The final offer was void at the close of business that day. They knew JetBlue could not secure the extra $$$ needed in that time and the VX board would have to take their offer.
Mea25000 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices