Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
American interviews and class dates >

American interviews and class dates

Search
Notices

American interviews and class dates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2015, 06:55 PM
  #3391  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by QuagmireGiggity View Post
They were a part of the four party agreement. In other words APA supports it so not sure what the problem is.
The "four party agreement" really isn't controlling the present batch of AE flows (AKA the "824" pilots). Yes, they were awarded flow-thru opportunities via an arbitration award pursuant to that agreement, but they are a byproduct of it, not something the APA is truly involved in. They come over just like any other street pilot except for vacation accrual and have their own flow rate mechanism not stipulated in the former Supplement W.

Originally Posted by QuagmireGiggity View Post
People currently flowing supported AA pilots allowing hundreds to come to Eagle as flowbacks. Eagle pilots suffered financial harm by displacements and stagnation. And they were happy to do it. We always believed at Eagle that all flying should be AA flying. That doesn't mean shut us out though. There's only so much they could do given the free market out there.
Now that there is some movement it's only fair to let us flow up as agreed without catching grief from people.
This fight should not be about mainline vs. regional pilot. It's pilots vs. management. Don't fall into that trap. The absorption of regionals into mainline may not be all that far away. For now a flow agreement is a step in the right direction as it puts pressure on management.
I think the majority felt this way, but a minority did not. Those not flowing wanted as much flying from wherever as Eagle (now Envoy) could get and a small percentage of senior F/O's were miffed they got stiffed out of their upgrade (or so they believed).

Originally Posted by QuagmireGiggity View Post
As far as the quality of regional pilots/interviews.. I agree there needs to be control from mainline recruitment. From what I gather about current Envoy recruitment is they are mostly getting military people that want to stay current. They are not taking any warm body like many regionals. (Not that many people would want to go there anyway with all the turmoil.)
There is always going to be some bad apples that don't get filtered.. just like there are bad apples that made it through mainline interviews. No interview process is foolproof.

It's not a perfect system. Hopefully all flying will be mainline with mainline pay scales in the next few years.
Agreed on a lot of this. One one hand, AE flows are vetted by AA more then any street hire as they have extensive info on their training performance, attitude, attendance and personality acquired over years or even decades vs. a street hire they have to judge with limited PRIA, FAA and a couple of hours of interaction. On the other hand, even if a specific flow is marginal in some or all those areas, they still get to swing the bat at AA and if their training is as least satisfactory, they make it to the line. Some flows simply wouldn't be selected street hire style though and that is the reality, but like you said, some pilots are good at playing the interview game and end up being less then desirable people to share a cockpit wiith, especially over time as the years roll by. The airline pilot business has always had a strong component of luck which can be good or not so good depending upon the person or more accurately, the personality.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 07-31-2015, 06:14 AM
  #3392  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Reverse Cowgirl
Posts: 545
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
The "four party agreement" really isn't controlling the present batch of AE flows (AKA the "824" pilots). Yes, they were awarded flow-thru opportunities via an arbitration award pursuant to that agreement, but they are a byproduct of it, not something the APA is truly involved in. They come over just like any other street pilot except for vacation accrual and have their own flow rate mechanism not stipulated in the former Supplement W.



I think the majority felt this way, but a minority did not. Those not flowing wanted as much flying from wherever as Eagle (now Envoy) could get and a small percentage of senior F/O's were miffed they got stiffed out of their upgrade (or so they believed).



Agreed on a lot of this. One one hand, AE flows are vetted by AA more then any street hire as they have extensive info on their training performance, attitude, attendance and personality acquired over years or even decades vs. a street hire they have to judge with limited PRIA, FAA and a couple of hours of interaction. On the other hand, even if a specific flow is marginal in some or all those areas, they still get to swing the bat at AA and if their training is as least satisfactory, they make it to the line. Some flows simply wouldn't be selected street hire style though and that is the reality, but like you said, some pilots are good at playing the interview game and end up being less then desirable people to share a cockpit wiith, especially over time as the years roll by. The airline pilot business has always had a strong component of luck which can be good or not so good depending upon the person or more accurately, the personality.
Yeah, I remember that minority all too well.
Embarrassing. It only took a handful of vocal idiots to make us all look bad.
Either way I understand the non -pro -flow -through groups sentiment. Some people would still get hired on their own and some shouldn't be hired for sure.
QuagmireGiggity is offline  
Old 07-31-2015, 08:47 AM
  #3393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dash8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: rabble rouser
Posts: 419
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
Agreed on a lot of this. One one hand, AE flows are vetted by AA more then any street hire as they have extensive info on their training performance, attitude, attendance and personality acquired over years or even decades vs. a street hire they have to judge with limited PRIA, FAA and a couple of hours of interaction. On the other hand, even if a specific flow is marginal in some or all those areas, they still get to swing the bat at AA and if their training is as least satisfactory, they make it to the line. Some flows simply wouldn't be selected street hire style though and that is the reality, but like you said, some pilots are good at playing the interview game and end up being less then desirable people to share a cockpit wiith, especially over time as the years roll by. The airline pilot business has always had a strong component of luck which can be good or not so good depending upon the person or more accurately, the personality.
this is also now true for the pdt flows (and the psa "pref interviews")

and to a previous post about why some people wouldn't just try ots instead of waiting for the flow (and in support of your point) , some people just don't interview well and are more than perfectly capable crewmembers. where some people could be very good schmoozers in an interview situation, but bad sticks and don't play well with others.
dash8 is offline  
Old 07-31-2015, 06:10 PM
  #3394  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by dash8 View Post
this is also now true for the pdt flows (and the psa "pref interviews")

and to a previous post about why some people wouldn't just try ots instead of waiting for the flow (and in support of your point) , some people just don't interview well and are more than perfectly capable crewmembers. where some people could be very good schmoozers in an interview situation, but bad sticks and don't play well with others.
Yes, that is the reality. In a previous life, I was the interviewer for a market research firm and not unlike dating websites, people put on a "face" in certain situations to present that which they want to convey to achieve a goal (in this case, a job offer), when in reality it is not the real person within. Some people can do this quite effectively. At both Eagle and AA, I've flown with people who normally would have made me scratch my head about how they made it through the interview process, but then again, I understand its flaws. None of us are perfect of course and so far at AA. I've not yet felt compelled to figure out how to put someone on my "do not pair" request, so it hasn't been bad at all, but then again, it takes A LOT to push my buttons to that point. I know of a couple of my flow counterparts who have had run-in's with captains I was able to fly with.

Let's face it..........this profession is filled to the brim with alpha males with minimal tact and a tendancy to shoot from the hip and that has nothing to do with physically flying an aircraft. Being an effective pilot (especially a captain) is as much about personality as about airmanship.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 08-01-2015, 08:22 PM
  #3395  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: E190 FO
Posts: 324
Default

Does anyone know how AA decides who to call first for training in a new hire class? My group has 17 of us and I know we won't all get called for the same class so I'm just wondering how they decide who to call first.
Thanks.
TOGAANG is offline  
Old 08-02-2015, 10:26 AM
  #3396  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 63
Default

Originally Posted by TOGAANG View Post
Does anyone know how AA decides who to call first for training in a new hire class? My group has 17 of us and I know we won't all get called for the same class so I'm just wondering how they decide who to call first.
Thanks.
What group are you in?
C5Quest is offline  
Old 08-02-2015, 10:28 AM
  #3397  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: E190 FO
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by C5Quest View Post
What group are you in?
Second interview group in Jan.
TOGAANG is offline  
Old 08-02-2015, 05:47 PM
  #3398  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 63
Default

Originally Posted by TOGAANG View Post
Second interview group in Jan.
17? That's a big group. We had ten in the first Jan group
C5Quest is offline  
Old 08-02-2015, 08:35 PM
  #3399  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: E190 FO
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by C5Quest View Post
17? That's a big group. We had ten in the first Jan group
Yes but I know two for sure that have moved on to DAL and UAL. I'm sure there are a couple more too.

Hopefully this month the rest of the Octobet guys get emails for September classes. With a little luck maybe they will even get to your group.
TOGAANG is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 05:41 AM
  #3400  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 63
Default

Originally Posted by TOGAANG View Post
Yes but I know two for sure that have moved on to DAL and UAL. I'm sure there are a couple more too.

Hopefully this month the rest of the Octobet guys get emails for September classes. With a little luck maybe they will even get to your group.
I hope so. Has anyone from Oct got called yet?
C5Quest is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
easyflyer
FedEx
1246
05-24-2016 09:38 AM
heading180
Regional
6098
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
B1900YX
Regional
67
07-22-2011 07:46 AM
F9forME
Frontier
4
11-04-2006 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices