JCBA Questions
04-18-2014, 04:29 PM
#51
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by bassslayer
He hates for USAPA/East pilots because:
1. He is terrified that the USAPA SLI proposal will not give him credit for his LOS at Eagle and will lose seniority to third list pilots who he feels should be below him.
2.He has West friends
1. He is terrified that the USAPA SLI proposal will not give him credit for his LOS at Eagle and will lose seniority to third list pilots who he feels should be below him.
2.He has West friends
I was a Usapian punching bag long before the merger was announced. I knew some of those who are now West, but lost touch. My criticisms are about integrity, honor and living up to your agreements and considering that, I can see why my motives confuse you.
04-18-2014, 04:41 PM
#53
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
APA supports the idea that all three seniority lists recognized by the MOU each have their own representation in arbitration. The company supports this position as well as the west.
It is that simple. The east pilots are the oddballs here.
It is that simple. The east pilots are the oddballs here.
04-18-2014, 04:43 PM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Originally Posted by eaglefly
I know how you feel, as I don't some of you guys either. As far as implying one of you guys was banging my wife/girlfriend, you're late to that party. Another one of your chums made the same classy inference months ago. 
04-18-2014, 04:45 PM
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
[QUOTE=eaglefly;1625822They only see what they want to see and that's what they want to see. [/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, THEY[we] only see what we want to see, while you see it all. How about my stance that the west should have it's own representation? How does that align with your "one size fits all east" statement?
Oh yeah, THEY[we] only see what we want to see, while you see it all. How about my stance that the west should have it's own representation? How does that align with your "one size fits all east" statement?
04-18-2014, 04:47 PM
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Originally Posted by eaglefly
There always is with you guys when it comes to me. A few more of your chums should have gotten the PM to rally for attack and they're late. What's up with that ?
You have managed to alienate many east groups, even those that don't see eye to eye on things. Good job.
04-18-2014, 06:35 PM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: A320
Posts: 225
Originally Posted by R57 relay
Well, no answer from nuts. I guess the question was too hard, or he had to go to AOL because he didn't see that response coming. Hope his tie purchases meet the level needed to get guidance.
The APA filing for single carrier status is independent of the MB process- there is nothing sinister behind their motivations like you fear. Thus, I see no issues with what the APA is doing. As long as each seniority list being integrated is given fair representation status the requirements of MB are met and that is what I fully support.
Usapa obviously thinks otherwise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cloudseer
Flight Schools and Training
2
07-12-2011 05:51 PM
Cosmik
Flight Schools and Training
9
02-08-2007 07:21 AM
