To add a little more background, the Scheduling Improvement Group (SIG) and its pilot teams review all the pairings that the company builds and then uses those pairings to build the pilot bid lines for the month.
From our disputed pairing email:
The SIG/PSIT takes the issue of pairing disputes very seriously. Pairings are not disputed because the SIG/PSIT considers them to be merely "inconvenient." A pairing will be disputed when identified by the FEDEX MEC as having been constructed with unsafe, onerous, or otherwise objectionable flying.
Disputed pairings should not be available in any bid pack lines and should not be assigned to any Secondary lines without a specific request, by pairing number, from the crewmember in the 36-hour request.
Pairings not specifically requested will then fall into the Open Time bin where they can be picked up by any pilot. Therein lies the real rub: the SIG says please don't fly them so we can negotiate getting them fixed next month vs the guy who simply sees an trip he can fly.
The specific reasons that pairings are disputed varys: pushing duty limits, circadian rhythm resets, unreasonable turn times, doesn't pass smell/common sense test.
ALPA's founders chose "Schedule with Safety" as their motto, and that is the SIG/PSIT's standard when reviewing and build bid pack lines. And it is the opinion of many that flying these disputed pairings undermines that premise.
.