Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
F/Os as 121 sim check airmen? >

F/Os as 121 sim check airmen?

Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

F/Os as 121 sim check airmen?

Old 12-05-2012, 09:19 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Default

I don't think the FAA or the regs observe terms like "Captain" and "F/O".

The regs use terms like PIC and although your contract equates PIC with captain, the regs do not. Ability to " Hold captain" and "Seniority" are not conditions of regulatory compliance.
AvSec is offline  
Old 12-06-2012, 07:21 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by AvSec View Post
I don't think the FAA or the regs observe terms like "Captain" and "F/O".

The regs use terms like PIC and although your contract equates PIC with captain, the regs do not. Ability to " Hold captain" and "Seniority" are not conditions of regulatory compliance.
I think that's true of nautical regs as well. The person in ultimate charge of a vessel is the "Master", even though usually referred to as "Captain".
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 12-08-2012, 07:28 AM
  #13  
Snakes & Nape
 
Phantom Flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: B-767 Captain
Posts: 775
Unhappy Funny Smell

Originally Posted by pilatusguy View Post
They are giving PCs, both recurrent and for captain upgrades (captains are type rated as new-hires). They are also conducting captain upgrade sim training.
I won't claim to be an expert by any stretch of the imagination and I've seen some strange things in aviation but in my 18+ years in a major airline 121 training environment, I've never heard of a First Officer giving PC's, recurrent and Captain upgrades.

United used Pilot Instructors (PI's) who were mostly F/O's by seniority, for sim training but they did NOT give check rides, type rides or PC's. They all had to go through a Captain's qualification, type ride and maintain a Captain's qualification during their stint "in the fleet" as a PI.

In other carriers, I've never heard of the scenario you mentioned.

Sounds very "fishy" to me.

G'Luck Mate
Phantom Flyer is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 09:45 PM
  #14  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by xjtguy View Post
Just curious, but you say "new airline". Could these FO's that are instructors be part of an initial cadre program? My previous company added both a new operating certificate as well as an aircraft type. Initial Cadre pilots are afforded a whole slew of exemptions. As far as the FAA is concerned, seniority doesn't matter. It's simply what the operator gets past the inspector;
They are not part of the initial cadre program.
pilatusguy is offline  
Old 12-27-2012, 09:56 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by AvSec View Post
I don't think the FAA or the regs observe terms like "Captain" and "F/O".

The regs use terms like PIC and although your contract equates PIC with captain, the regs do not. Ability to " Hold captain" and "Seniority" are not conditions of regulatory compliance.
Correct, the regulation does not state "captain" it states that a simulator check airman must complete all the training required to "serve as pilot in command...in operations under this part (121)".

FAR 121.412 also states that simulator instructors must have completed the same training. The only difference in 121.411 (c), which covers simulator check airmen, and 121.412 (c), which covers simulator instructors, is the requirement in 121.411 (c) for a simulator check airman be approved by the administrator (ie. the Check Airman Letter from the POI).

Still have not found a way around this other than using a 142 certificate to conduct training, either by using a separate training entity all together, or by creating a separate training division that has a 142 certificate like Delta has with Delta Global Services; or by using medically disqualified/past age 65 pilots, who participate in the Line Observation Program. Neither of these are the case with this airline. Most checking events and all recurrent training events are conducted by first officers who have not completed upgrade training (IOE & Fed Ride).
pilatusguy is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 09:07 AM
  #16  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 16
Default

Long story short on this - the basic question is what training is required to serve as PIC in operations under part 121. From FAA legal - PICs under 121 operations are required to have completed all upgrade ground training, flight training and upgrade IOE. Sounds like this is not legal.
pilatusguy is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 03:09 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Somewhere in a hollowed out hole...yet with broadband
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by Phantom Flyer View Post
I won't claim to be an expert by any stretch of the imagination and I've seen some strange things in aviation but in my 18+ years in a major airline 121 training environment, I've never heard of a First Officer giving PC's, recurrent and Captain upgrades.

United used Pilot Instructors (PI's) who were mostly F/O's by seniority, for sim training but they did NOT give check rides, type rides or PC's. They all had to go through a Captain's qualification, type ride and maintain a Captain's qualification during their stint "in the fleet" as a PI.

In other carriers, I've never heard of the scenario you mentioned.

Sounds very "fishy" to me.

G'Luck Mate
Agreed..they all go through the entire Captain upgrade program to include IOE and a line check. They do not give MV or LOE rides. Just your basic sim sessions and FTD's.
Gupboy is offline  
Old 04-22-2013, 08:31 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Stetson29's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: Pilot Monitoring
Posts: 68
Default

I know for a fact that 4 current part 121 regional carriers are using former Comair pilots as check airmen.
I know that some of these pilots are FOs at these airlines, not contract or management pilots. I do not know about all of them.
These pilots bring many thousands of PIC hours to their new airlines in the exact aircraft they were flying at Comair.
Many of them were check airmen at Comair. Some were instructor pilots and some with just vast experience in the CRJ.
Could any of these be the pilots you are referencing?
Stetson29 is offline  
Old 04-23-2013, 07:53 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 880
Default

New part 121? Or maybe a 121 airline already that is branching into new areas?
Gjn290 is offline  
Old 01-29-2015, 08:47 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Default F/Os as 121 sim check airmen?

At my airline FOs are sim check airmen, but they must have completed the upgrade training. In fact all of the instructors who are FOs have completed upgrade training, including the LOE. They have NOT completed upgrade IOE or line check, but I'm not convinced that is required by the reg for simulator check airmen. Clearly it is for line check airmen.

In any case, since holding captain is merely a function of seniority (not experience or merit) then I'm not sure why it would matter if they are an FO or captain. You want the best men for the job, not the most senior men for the job.
Southerner is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
paxhauler85
Regional
177
11-02-2008 10:55 PM
bryris
Major
43
07-22-2008 03:04 PM
TchNgo
Regional
38
03-24-2008 11:18 PM
Freight Dog
Major
72
03-12-2007 02:12 PM
Hornetguy
Fractional
3
02-04-2007 01:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices