Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-14-2012, 06:05 AM   #1 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 164
Default Why is jet SIC time < GA PIC?

Hi guys,

Couldn't find the answer via search.

I've been reading through many posts and talking to many career pilots in regards to hirings mins and just can't seem to figure it out:

Why is jet SIC worth less than any GA PIC (I.e. all that time was in light GA aircraft)? A Jet is an enormously more complex aircraft than anything Brian has ever touched, so why is Andy penalized? (see below)

E.g.:

Andy (regional FO) has 1500hrs TT: 250 PIC (in C172s) and 1200 multi-jet-SIC.

Brian (a CFI) has 1500hrs TT: 1300 PIC (in C172s), 200 multi. (piper Seneca)

According to the posts I've read, Brian is more competitive than Andy simply because he has so much more PIC.
mikearuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 05-14-2012, 06:21 AM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
jumpseat2024's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: CRJ700 F/O
Posts: 261
Default

it's not the type of plane that matters all that much..it's the decision making and responsibility that comes along with being a PIC and/or CFI

Most of that 250 hours of PIC is done with an instructor next to you..sure on paper is "PIC"..but there's always that safety net of an instructor.
jumpseat2024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 06:30 AM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,417
Default

Yep, exactly. The more the PIC time, the more chances you've had to go out there and make decisions, evaluate situations, and learn from mistakes. That experience is endlessly more valuable than sitting next to the person doing it, no matter what airplane you're in.

Plus, if you have 1500TT of GA time, it means you've probably been employed in the general aviation world. Which means you've probably been put in some tough situations and gained a lot of above mentioned experience in a trial-by-fire method.

Someone who has 1500TT, most of which is jet-PIC, screams to me that they bought their job and they're a seat filler without any real ability to add to the flight other than doing rote mundane tasks.

Of course, there are exceptions to both examples....
lolwut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 06:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
hc0fitted's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: ERJ 145-FO
Posts: 230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolwut View Post
Yep, exactly. The more the PIC time, the more chances you've had to go out there and make decisions, evaluate situations, and learn from mistakes. That experience is endlessly more valuable than sitting next to the person doing it, no matter what airplane you're in.

Plus, if you have 1500TT of GA time, it means you've probably been employed in the general aviation world. Which means you've probably been put in some tough situations and gained a lot of above mentioned experience in a trial-by-fire method.

Someone who has 1500TT, most of which is jet-PIC, screams to me that they bought their job and they're a seat filler without any real ability to add to the flight other than doing rote mundane tasks.

Of course, there are exceptions to both examples....
. I agree with everything about it not mattering what type of airplane it is . PIC is about decesion makings being in charge runing the shown etc etc . PIC always comes on top and will be weighed more than anything. However, I don't understand where you come off as saying you view someone who say has 1500 hours and good chunk of it is SIC( I assume that's what you ment.) that they "bought" their job ? Just because someone didnt have 1200 hours of dual given like you may have had before landing a regional job, or whatever the case may be.
hc0fitted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 08:20 AM   #5 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 16
Default

I'm not sure we'll find many civilians with 1500 and most of that is Jet-PIC. And if you tell a military pilot they "bought" their job you've got bigger problems than your thinking.
550driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 09:09 AM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
it's not the type of plane that matters all that much..it's the decision making and responsibility that comes along with being a PIC and/or CFI
.
This definitely makes sense to me.

But I'm going out on a limb here but... my assumption is that being a regional FO gives you a whole new (higher) level of exposure with much more complex operations and weather considerations to deal with. Again it's just my assumption since I'm obviously not a jet pilot.

Doesn't that experience count much more toward becoming a more competitive pilot for the Fractionals or Majors than instructing students for thousands of hours?

Not that being a CFI isn't tough! But it seems to me that getting experience in an "airline-jet-complex airspace" environment is what employers would prefer over PIC time?
mikearuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 09:26 AM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 10,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikearuba View Post
This definitely makes sense to me.

But I'm going out on a limb here but... my assumption is that being a regional FO gives you a whole new (higher) level of exposure with much more complex operations and weather considerations to deal with. Again it's just my assumption since I'm obviously not a jet pilot.

Doesn't that experience count much more toward becoming a more competitive pilot for the Fractionals or Majors than instructing students for thousands of hours?

Not that being a CFI isn't tough! But it seems to me that getting experience in an "airline-jet-complex airspace" environment is what employers would prefer over PIC time?
You are forgetting about the highly structured environment that P121 and most P135 companies operate under during normal conditions. Eventually - that is why most employers like a mix of the two. Some PIC time to check the aeronautical decision making block, and the P121/P135 time to check the airline type operations block.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 01:58 PM   #8 (permalink)
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: CRJ
Posts: 14,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikearuba View Post
Hi guys,

Couldn't find the answer via search.

I've been reading through many posts and talking to many career pilots in regards to hirings mins and just can't seem to figure it out:

Why is jet SIC worth less than any GA PIC (I.e. all that time was in light GA aircraft)? A Jet is an enormously more complex aircraft than anything Brian has ever touched, so why is Andy penalized? (see below)

E.g.:

Andy (regional FO) has 1500hrs TT: 250 PIC (in C172s) and 1200 multi-jet-SIC.

Brian (a CFI) has 1500hrs TT: 1300 PIC (in C172s), 200 multi. (piper Seneca)

According to the posts I've read, Brian is more competitive than Andy simply because he has so much more PIC.

Not necessarily, it would depend on what the job was. If it was bush pilot job, they'd take Brian for sure.

If it was a regional FO job they'd probably take Andy.

No major would hire Brian (no turbine time). Some might hire Andy, but only if he was well-connected.


Turbine experience and PIC experience are two different things.

Turbine means you can (probably) handle complex machinery.

PIC means you can (probably) exercise judgement and decision-making skills.

A guy who is a master of jet technology but is afraid or incapable of making a decision is going to make a bad airline CA.

A guy who is a skilled and experienced ASEL bush pilot but just cannot fully grasp the intricacies of a glass jet will also make a bad airline CA.

What major airlines really want is turbine PIC...best of both worlds.
rickair7777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 04:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Commercial Pilot
Posts: 4,786
Default

I agree with Rick, and I have seen repeatedly in my travels that jet skill does not necessarily correlate with GA skill. It's simply a different game. Now it may be that the typical jet pilot is a better pilot on average than the typical GA pilot, which could happen by virtue of career dynamics. But if you drop a high-time jet person into an Apache or a SuperCub all bets are off. The skills do not correlate very closely. The other issue is, does PIC in any airplane have greater value than SIC in the same machine. Obviously it does.
__________________
Turn the heat O-F-F!
Cubdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 06:24 PM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 10,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
I agree with Rick, and I have seen repeatedly in my travels that jet skill does not necessarily correlate with GA skill. It's simply a different game. Now it may be that the typical jet pilot is a better pilot on average than the typical GA pilot, which could happen by virtue of career dynamics. But if you drop a high-time jet person into an Apache or a SuperCub all bets are off. The skills do not correlate very closely. The other issue is, does PIC in any airplane have greater value than SIC in the same machine. Obviously it does.
Would you expect that more experienced jet pilot (assumed in your scenario) to be to able to 'pick the GA up again' and little quicker than that less experienced GA pilot transitioning into a jet?
One has presumably some previous GA experience from which to draw while the other may be entering into a whole new realm of aviation for which s/he has no comparison.
Personally I have been finding reentering the GA world (in a way) has been very rewarding for me and I feel much more like a 'real' pilot now than ever before. I love the airplane and the places I go, though I do feel that things happen slower and at a more controlled pace than I was use to in the past. I certainly seem to have more time to 'look around ' at 4 miles a minutes than I did at 8-10!
I have the opportunity to fly with pilots from differing backgrounds and I have found that what I would consider to be the best 'pure' pilots (meaning their overall understanding of the aviation world) come from the civilian background pilots whom mostly have other aviation related experience like ATC for example and then flew the standard route to gain experience of instructing, night freight, or air ambulance.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is online now   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just ME time or ME PIC time? Duksrule Career Questions 10 10-17-2011 01:23 PM
High alt. endors to log Dual+PIC in King Air? nciflyer Aviation Law 11 07-04-2009 01:29 PM
Competitive Times for a Corporate Gig paxhauler85 Corporate 29 07-08-2008 07:57 PM
Multi Time colinflyin Regional 10 03-13-2007 09:25 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 AM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.