Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-25-2007, 11:33 AM   #181 (permalink)
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,879
Default

I'm lost here. From what I got from the union statements is that they will pursue it, they just need to get some stuff taken care of. How is seniority integration a dead issue now?

Am I lacking sleep or something?
__________________
100% IPA
Freightpuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 09-25-2007, 05:17 PM   #182 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default


I'm lost here. From what I got from the union statements is that they will pursue it, they just need to get some stuff taken care of. How is seniority integration a dead issue now? Am I lacking sleep or something?

We’re just speculating that’s all. I do agree with you that the union will pursue with this but I do not think it’ll happen anytime soon. I base it on this part of their statement:

“…Having said that, the EB believes work has to be done before taking additional steps. Over 400 of our members indicated their opposition and over 500 did not participate in response to one critical question. On such an important issue, we believe we can do better. One key may be in education. In the future, we will develop FAQ’s and other educational materials aimed at providing more in depth explanations of the issues involved. At an appropriate time, a follow-up poll may be conducted…”

- If they’re planning on pursuing this issue then why do we need a follow-up poll?

Initially the union made it clear that they wanted at least 80% YES votes in order to pursue the issue:

“…The EB has decided that our target for proceeding down this path will involve a minimum of 80% of the active membership (non-probationary) participating in the poll and a minimum of 80% of those participating to answer “YES” to three questions”

They said minimum 80% of active membership (those voting) which would be much easier than 80% of all members. Many times when voters don’t see a clear choice they really like they tend not to vote. Clearly, many members were very conflicted here and chose not to vote.
Yet even though they are only looking at the “active” membership one question still failed the threshold of 80% (even though 79% seems close enough to me).

Furthermore, as “brown tale” pointed out, if you look into the total membership numbers and not just the ones who voted (I know that’s not the method the union is using, but it’s interesting to compare) the goal of 80% support is even further away.

Question:
1) YES – 87.7% of those who voted, or - 70.5% of all eligible voters,
2) YES – 79.0% of those who voted, or - 63.5% of all eligible voters,
3) YES – 84.7% of those who voted, or - 68.1% of all eligible voters

>80%
<80%

I didn’t double check the math; I am using “brown tale’s” numbers.

So in a nutshell I don’t think it’s a dead issue at all. I just think some CPR and even a defibrillator might be needed to resuscitate the patient.

I hope I’m wrong and I hope y’all can tell me why?
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For a good laugh cgtodd Hangar Talk 0 07-14-2007 07:22 AM
NWA USA today Article taylorjets Major 38 07-05-2007 02:33 PM
IPA Press Release 10/4/2005 Freighter Captain Cargo 0 10-04-2005 03:10 PM
IPA files scope grievance against UPS Freighter Captain Cargo 1 09-28-2005 05:40 PM
UPS counters IPA Freighter Captain Cargo 0 07-11-2005 08:59 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:57 AM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.