Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-06-2007, 03:03 AM   #1 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
CaptainGator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: MD11 Captain
Posts: 40
Default 727 Disputed pairings

Good day fellow FedEx crew-members, Due to my frustration with tracking and continually seeing some 727 crew-members volunteer to fly disputed pairings I've decided to post this list. By posting these names some of us reading this forum may recognize one or more of these names and can give our peers a call and attempt to explain the damage they are doing by willingly flying these trips. Maybe they will listen to a friend. At a minimum it makes it very difficult for our scheduling committees to grieve one of these trips if the crew-members are voluntarily picking them up in open time. Can you just hear "O" asking the union "why are pilots asking to fly this trip if it is so unsafe"? Good question.
Please keep in mind that if the trip is assigned to a pilot sitting reserve then that pilot has no choice but to fly the trip. Please be professional and diplomatic when you speak with your peers. This is not an attempt to bash these pilots just a simple way to get the word out about the harm that is being caused by flying disputed pairings.
__________________
Take it back.

Last edited by BonesF15; 10-06-2007 at 05:01 AM. Reason: Posting personal information
CaptainGator is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 10-06-2007, 04:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
magic rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 494
Default Opsec 101

Dear CaptainGator,
I think you are wrong for posting names and employees number on the internet. You should worry more about the security/privacy of the pilot group that you appear to hold oh so dear to your heart (you don't have any MD-11 FOMs for sale on eBay do you?) and less about losers flying disputed pairings!

Why do you call each person YOURSELF? You know where to get the numbers!!

Why don't you post YOUR NAME AND NUMBER so when one calls these fellows, they can say from whom the info was obtained!!!

Moderator, please remove this post.

Last edited by magic rat; 10-06-2007 at 04:13 AM.
magic rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 04:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: A300 Captain
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by magic rat View Post
Dear CaptainGator,
I think you are an A$$ for posting names and employees number on the internet. You should worry more about the security/privacy of the pilot group that you appear to hold oh so dear to your heart (you don't have any MD-11 FOMs for sale do you?) and less about losers flying disputed pairings!
Right on Gator! Until these scum are treated like the slime they are it will never stop.
__________________
Airbags began devolution!
Bitme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 05:01 AM   #4 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
CaptainGator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: MD11 Captain
Posts: 40
Default

Whoa now MagicRat, first of all any of these pairings and pilots names can be obtained from VIPS by anyone who wants. And Bitme, not all these pilots are scum. I've called friends I knew and once they had it explained to them the disputed pairing process and how it hurts our scheduling committee and fellow pilots most gladly dropped the trips. Heck, I accidentally picked one up once (then dropped it). I tried to be as diplomatic as I could and am simply giving out information that be can obtained by anyone and putting it in one place where it will provide the greatest opportunity for education.
By the way...I do not get paid to work for the union. Just a line pilot.
__________________
Take it back.

Last edited by CaptainGator; 10-06-2007 at 05:03 AM. Reason: grammar
CaptainGator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 05:29 AM   #5 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
magic rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 494
Default

Is this website accessed through secure VIPS?

Last edited by BonesF15; 10-06-2007 at 05:54 AM. Reason: name calling
magic rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 05:42 AM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11
Posts: 311
Default

I am sure Gator meant well by highlighting the greedy back-stabbers that choose to undermine the SIG and fly this trash but we can't post personal information on a public web site.

In the past guys have posted links to the disputed pairings that required VIPS access to view the info. This made it easy to view the disputed pairings and the offenders but kept the personal information off the web.

If the majority of us would take the time and effort to confront the folks we know personally then DP's wouldn't be a problem.
BonesF15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 05:54 AM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,900
Default

While I agree that flying DPs needs to be addressed, putting these names on the internet does only a few things...

1. It gets the moderators busy as they remove names as soon as they seem them
2. It gets FDX management involved as they will try to find out who posted them

I think a phone call or considerate, professional email stating you know its probably an oversight, BUT the work of the SIG is important, etc etc is a better method.

Like Bones said--if you WANT to call out someone then post the pairing/date. That is easy enough to look up in VIPs.
Albief15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 05:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
magic rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 494
Default

Thanks Bones
magic rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 06:21 AM   #9 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 757 FO
Posts: 5,567
Default

How about we post their names in pig latin?

DXlagfay

PS
Sorry I signed on to late to see the good stuff.

PSS

Albie I am new to this R-24 thing (it really sucks). When and how do they usually tell you when your 1-7 is here?
FDXLAG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 06:30 AM   #10 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
AFW_MD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11 FO, ANC
Posts: 1,005
Default Or........

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albief15 View Post
While I agree that flying DPs needs to be addressed, putting these names on the internet does only a few things...

1. It gets the moderators busy as they remove names as soon as they seem them
2. It gets FDX management involved as they will try to find out who posted them

I think a phone call or considerate, professional email stating you know its probably an oversight, BUT the work of the SIG is important, etc etc is a better method.

Like Bones said--if you WANT to call out someone then post the pairing/date. That is easy enough to look up in VIPs.
Or if you've gone to the trouble to consolidate all that info for everyone, why not post it on the FedEx ALPA web forum?

Then post something on here notifying everyone to go read the other forum.

Names can be (and are) used there.

I agree it is frustrating.

Keeping it in-house is probably a better approach though - don't you think?
AFW_MD11 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HKG Sample Pairings: Good Luck md11phlyer Cargo 50 10-08-2007 06:13 AM
Substitution and Disputed Pairings Dakota Cargo 12 10-05-2007 04:55 PM
727 MEM Second Officer # Differences ?? DLax85 Cargo 4 08-20-2007 03:44 PM
July Disputed 727 Pairings. groggy Cargo 13 06-25-2007 07:41 AM
Pairings Lennon JetBlue 7 07-29-2005 04:17 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:19 PM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.