Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-27-2010, 03:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shaggy1970's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 699
Default Call to Action on NPRM

Ladies and Gentleman,

Its time to act. Go to the CAPA site and write your elected officials, encourage friends, families and others to do the same. The whole process takes less than two minuets as its done electronically for you! Here are the details.


To send a letter to Congress, follow these few simple steps:

1. Go to Home | Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations, click on the "Contact Your Legislators" button on right side of the CAPA Home Page.

2. Under "Current Action Alerts" header, click on "Support These Changes to the FAA's Flight Time/Duty Time NPRM"

3. Enter your zip code in the "Action Alert" box, write your name in the "Your Name" box, enter your sender information below and click "Send Message."
For additional information on this issue, please click on this link "CAPA Flight Time/Duty Time Talking Points"(Flight Time/Duty Time (FT/DT) CAPA Talking Points | Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations).




Here is the end product if you want to cut and paste and send it the old fashion way and also the way you need to send it to Babbitt.

October 27, 2010

[recipient address was inserted here]


Dear [recipient name was inserted here],

As a US commercial pilot reviewing the FAA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) on Flight crew member Duty and Rest Requirements I am pleased that
the majority of the NPRM represents an improvement to current regulations
and covers all commercial operations in the spirit of "One Level of
Safety." However, there are some specific items that need to be changed in
order to mitigate fatigue for the professional pilot.

1) The flight time limit should not be increased 25% from 8 hours to
10 hours. 2) The augmented (3 person) flight time limit should not be
increased 25% from 12 to 15 hours. 3) Rest requirements should be 10
hours domestic and 14 hours international. 9 hours, reducible to 8 hours
is not enough time to achieve restorative sleep, eat, and attend to
personal hygiene between duty periods. 4) Domestic augmentation should
not be allowed.

As a professional commercial aviator working at high speed in congested
airspace, and through arduous weather conditions, I can tell you that
fatigue mitigation is paramount to improving the safety of the travelling
public. The NTSB has held fatigue on its "Most Wanted List" for thirty
years because it is a problem that flight crews deal with on a daily
basis. This FAA NPRM will go a long way to reducing fatigue and increasing
safety if these items are addressed.

Sincerely,
Shaggy1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 10-27-2010, 03:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shaggy1970's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 699
Default

MODS,
Can you make this a sticky and post it so all forums can see it in each respective category?
Shaggy1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 05:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Check 6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 777 Kitchen engineer
Posts: 673
Default

Thanks for the info and the links.... Took less than 2 minutes.
__________________
"Dodge, Dip, Dive, Duck and Dodge" The 5 D's of Dodgeball
Check 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 03:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 320
Default

Yup, better write those letters and undermine our best chance for realistic change to 60 year old flight and duty time regs.
say that again is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 09:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
HughJarse 747's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757, 767
Posts: 14
Default

Please correct me if I am wrong, but the address for Randy Babbit is:

Room 1010
800 Independence Avenue
Washington DC 20591
__________________
Doh! Where's the "any" key?
HughJarse 747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 01:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Fedex MD-11 FO
Posts: 1,139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by say that again View Post
Yup, better write those letters and undermine our best chance for realistic change to 60 year old flight and duty time regs.
Undermine a chance to fly 10 hours unaugmented........ what were we thinking?

So, 60 years is the limit on common sense? The constitution is over 200 years old, should we re-vamp that now too? (Well, more than is already being attempted by the current idiots)

There may be some aspects of this NPRM that make sense and should be implemented. But, this isn't a negotiation. We shouldn't make concessions to long standing flight/duty limits just get other needed improvements.
Adlerdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 04:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shaggy1970's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 699
Default

How about we quit with all the drama and just log on to this web site, follow the easy steps and let your voice be heard.

Mods how about we promote this cause and publish it in every forum? Why is this so hard to do? We are our own worst enemies!
Shaggy1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 05:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Ditch dig'n for the Man
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 1,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
Undermine a chance to fly 10 hours unaugmented........ what were we thinking?

So, 60 years is the limit on common sense? The constitution is over 200 years old, should we re-vamp that now too? (Well, more than is already being attempted by the current idiots)

There may be some aspects of this NPRM that make sense and should be implemented. But, this isn't a negotiation. We shouldn't make concessions to long standing flight/duty limits just get other needed improvements.
I've reviewed the current 121 flag and domestic regs regarding flight and duty rest and compared them to contract standard (Fedex) and proposed changes as outline in the FAA NPRM for flight and duty regs.

I'm curious what aspects you think are so sacrosanct that flushing this proposal is better than the current law? There seems to be a lot of noise over on the Pax boards about the 8 hour rule. Ok, lets talk about it. Current law makes no distinction between when you start flying your 8 hours in a single duty period, just (by inference) how long you can stay on duty (16 hours).
Now I don't do a lot of "normal" morning day starts like the pax guys do, but I can tell you this, I (could) flying longer, more hours during that start of a day than when I typically do. The propose changes would allow more day flying, possibly up to 10 hours (Duty start between 0700-1259 LBT) and less for others. I'm not advocating for the 10 hour change, I think the times when I do fly are still too high, but at least we do have times. EU duty regs make no mention of flight times, just limits on duty time based on time of day the duty starts. Personally I'd give them their 10 hours for an normal am start, because I think it is reasonable, as long as they shorten the allowable flight times when the duty is arduous.

We at Fedex have some caveat's in our contract that allow us to fly to FAR duty limits. Some guy flying a load of people complaining about flying over 8 hours rings a little hollow. Under the current law he too can be extended to 16 hours, long enough that he'll miss happy hour. When we have an operational emergency, we can be extended to almost the start of the next happy hour. When having been awake all night, thats a bad thing.
Is flying more than 8 hours more fatiguing than less, absolutely, the less the better always. Is 8 equal at any time of day, absolutely not. Can we live with 9 (or possibly 10) hours during any part of the day? If you don't think so, I guess you don't make very many night sorties. We need this duty relief and the proposals to increase some allowable flight times are not unreasonable, as long as some FTL limits are reduced.
dckozak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2010, 01:29 AM   #9 (permalink)
Proponent of Hysteria
 
skypine27's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: "Part of the problem." : JL
Posts: 738
Default

Did it. Thanks
__________________
Overweight Pilot #1: Stay on Target! Stay on Target!!
skypine27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 07:13 AM   #10 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
72Bluestreak31's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B-777 Captain
Posts: 31
Default

Done. Sent
__________________
I might not know where I am … But, I ain’t lost
72Bluestreak31 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We will call you in 6 months? flyboy2136 Career Questions 4 06-08-2008 06:21 AM
ASA Long Call Reserve Question afterburn81 Regional 15 05-29-2008 03:26 PM
You call Crew Scheduling. Hold time =? Nightsky Regional 40 03-07-2008 10:24 PM
UAL domicile bid ? Colonel S Major 11 02-11-2008 02:10 PM
Safe Skies (Fall 2007) - Level Bust - Call Sign Confusion hyperone Cargo 14 10-27-2007 05:28 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 PM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.