Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-09-2011, 10:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
renman95's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 100
Default FedEx 767, more traction...

Boeing's Next Big Contract (BA)
__________________
phat, dumb & senior
renman95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 09-09-2011, 02:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Perm11FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: MD11 Kitchen *****
Posts: 182
Default 767ER P to F conversion

Here's a story that should create more traction for the FedEx 767 rumors.....

CAM buys B767-300 for conversion | Air Cargo World News
__________________
Schedule cherry picker
Perm11FO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 08:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheBaron's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 548
Default

767-300F is a perfect replacement for the MD-10-10's and I can see an eventual 767-400 based freighter replacing the few -30's we have. Unless there is a pretty significant shift in system form, however, no 767 variant is close to replacing the MD-11 the way we fly it now. Of course, as 777's continue to displace MD-11's off some of the traditional routes, we won't really need the extra lift of the Mad Dog so maybe the 767 is a "right-sizing." I'm voting for the Sonic Cruiser.
__________________
Tempus fugit
TheBaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 09:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shaggy1970's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 631
Default

Don't worry fellas, I am sure the amazing management team at brown is looking at ways of buying the -10's and -30's that are bound for the desert. The cheapest company on the planet will find a way to make this idea work.
Shaggy1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 10:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustUnderPar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Furloughed UPS
Posts: 747
Default

I wonder how much market share UPS has lost to FedEx under the "Davis Doctrine"?

Wonder if Wall-Street is watching? I'm sure they are
__________________
With the Resistance
JustUnderPar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2011, 02:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD-11Loader's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, & 747 Loadmaster
Posts: 122
Default

With such a limited supply of Rolls Royce powered 767's would FedEx really want them? IIRC QANTAS and British Airways are the only major operators of 767's with these engines.
__________________
The way I see it, you can either work for a living or you can fly airplanes. Me, I'd rather fly.
MD-11Loader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2011, 08:42 AM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
OKLATEX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B757 FO
Posts: 191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MD-11Loader View Post
With such a limited supply of Rolls Royce powered 767's would FedEx really want them? IIRC QANTAS and British Airways are the only major operators of 767's with these engines.
FedEx has no problems operating fleets with mixed engine types. The 757 has a mix of Pratts and Rolls, while the A300/310s have a mix of Pratts and GEs, as does the MD-11 Fleet. The only pure engine types have been on the DC-10s/MD-10s, 727 and the 777.

When given a choice on new airplanes, the company seems to prefer GE.
__________________
Boeing Builds Airplanes, Douglas Builds Character.
OKLATEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2011, 11:04 AM   #8 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
DaRaiders's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: On the corner, covered in Stickum
Posts: 299
Default

Would the 767 (either the 400 or 300) be a suitable replacement for the A300? I would love to see a all-Boeing fleet.
__________________
"Not at the table, Carlos."
DaRaiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2011, 12:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
MX727's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,026
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaRaiders View Post
I would love to see a all-Boeing fleet.
Why? FedEx has never liked being hostage to one manufacturer. It loves playing the two sides against each other.
__________________
"I suggest you don't assume anyone has a plan" -- Tractor Bob
MX727 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2011, 02:07 PM   #10 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: 767 Seat 1A
Posts: 94
Default

The range difference is significant, if international ops are a consideration. If new, I think Airbus has stopped production, but Boing is still making the 767.

Airbus A300-600 versus Boeing 767-300ER

364,000 lbs MTOW 412,000 lbs
4,158 nm range 6,102 nm
Lineslug is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad news for FedEx Browntail Cargo 8 08-01-2008 05:52 PM
Fedex lessons ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE Cargo 22 06-04-2008 01:16 PM
Mutiny on the FedEx truck Sasquatch Cargo 3 11-30-2005 07:42 PM
FedEx profits jump 51% SWAjet Major 0 03-17-2005 05:36 PM
FedEx Starts Daily Frankfurt-Shanghai RockBottom Major 0 03-05-2005 04:12 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 AM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.