Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-30-2012, 07:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wildmanny's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Unknown Rider
Posts: 400
Default FDX--Restarting the 757 Line

There is a strong rumor going around that us, UPS, and Delta have all approached Boeing about restarting the 757 line. Anyone hear this one? Why would we want new airplanes? Better deal to used, I always thought.

WM
Wildmanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 07-30-2012, 07:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 610
Default

UPS really just wants widebodies, but if the price is right...
Precontact is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 08:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wildmanny's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Unknown Rider
Posts: 400
Default

It's only a rumor. I think the 757 was built in Renton and that plant is MAXed out according to Aviation Week & Space Technology. IF they did restart that line, it would have to be a HUGE order and they'd have to find a spot to build. Charleston maybe? I don't see it, frankly, but you'd never know!
Wildmanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 08:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 135 Freight
Posts: 240
Default

Isn't Delta going with 737-900ERs as 757 replacements?
TallFlyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 09:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wildmanny's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Unknown Rider
Posts: 400
Default

They are. I spoke to a Delta guy today who said that the 900ER is a great plane, but there are certain routes that the 757 is better for, hence, Delta's interest in the 757. He mentioned Hawaii specifically.
Wildmanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 10:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Wrangler
Posts: 9,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildmanny View Post
They are. I spoke to a Delta guy today who said that the 900ER is a great plane, but there are certain routes that the 757 is better for, hence, Delta's interest in the 757. He mentioned Hawaii specifically.
Also any sort of performance critical airport. The 739ER is an absolute dog.
__________________
- Double Breasted Van Admiral
80ktsClamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 11:36 PM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
BHopper88's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 301
Default

If memory serves me right, Boeing destroyed all the tooling for the 757 line, thus making it almost impossible and very costly to restart it. Besides "hypothetically" it would hurt future sales of the 737. Why order an old airplane with 70s and 80s tech when you would want a 757-200/300NG?

Sad thing in the late 90s Boeing was begging NWA, Delta and anyone else that would listen to order more 75s or they would shut the line for good. It's not like the put all the tooling in the desert for storage. Then when gas prices went up, the 757 really showed how well it could do. I bet the 753 would be still selling if it was open. But it's all a pipe dream, the 757 line will never be reopened. Would hurt the 737 (-900)max orders too much.
BHopper88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 09:04 AM   #8 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Also any sort of performance critical airport. The 739ER is an absolute dog.
lolwut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 09:42 AM   #9 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 641
Default

I think it would be a new 757NG, not the old 757 being made the same way.

The tooling was destroyed, but there's really not much to making a 757. It's a stretched 737 with a different cockpit, wings, fully stowed gear, and empennage/stabilizers.

Pretty much all of those things would be reworked for an NG anyway, so wouldn't be too difficult.
threeighteen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 11:00 AM   #10 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHaz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildmanny View Post
There is a strong rumor going around that us, UPS, and Delta have all approached Boeing about restarting the 757 line. Anyone hear this one? Why would we want new airplanes? Better deal to used, I always thought.

WM
Maybe better depreciation advantage with new?
__________________
holding 7.5 degrees nose up
NoHaz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Corporate Air Bleeds Purple vagabond Cargo 83 07-14-2010 07:27 AM
FDX - Take my Jun single departure line (ANC) SC-7 Cargo 0 05-23-2009 03:28 AM
FDX Vacation 101 for line holder. groggy Cargo 3 01-20-2008 09:10 AM
FDX 757 Question Mink Cargo 31 01-12-2007 11:54 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:27 AM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.