Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 03-12-2009, 10:32 AM
  #5521  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: 320B
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
I can tell you that the 76 seat jet is not doing as well as they would like.

The 50's can be used to put the 100 million dollar belt system on a full loop between C and the baggage claim. (This one is pure genius)

Spent 100 million and it only goes one way. For less than 10 million more it could have gone back to baggage claim. Now we have our tug guys driving bags to bag claim and coming back empty. ****!
Had a buddy of mine tell me that one this AM, and all I could do is shake my head.

And they can't even blame a union for job protectionism. Just a very poor business decision.
1234 is offline  
Old 03-12-2009, 11:22 AM
  #5522  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by Imapilot2 View Post
I can tell you where I stand. If anyone DALPA even for one second lets the question come across their lips to ask us to let more seats in the CRJ or ERJ for the regionals...I will shove a SH1t sandwhich in there so fast it will make their head spin.
Any jet bigger than the CRJ 900 or the EMB 175 is main line period.
The old line in the sand was... if it's a jet, it's mainline. The line should have been held there, period. Now the cat is out of the bag, and the arguement centers around seating capacity, on jets. The large turboprops seem to be ignored.

My opinion in that anything over 50 seats should be a mainline aircraft, jet or turboprop. Anything going over 500 mile legs should be a mainline aircraft.... I'm seeing Chicago to Nassau in "regional" routes for example.

As long as the idea of "scope exceptions" is a viable alternative for managements, they will never put these things were they belong. They will continue to reduce mainline fleet size across the board to be replaced by these large "regional" aircraft. Expect more of the Midwest business plan... just outright outsourcing the flying.

Part of the problem is all the seperate unions, each trying to protect just their pilot group. Many have provisions to protect their own flying, but I have yet to see anything that contractually prohibts a company from using their pilots to fly somebody elses routes. There is an "us" vs "them" issue going on as well... with the them being both management, and other pilot groups, especially when dealing with mainline/regional pilot group issues.

An example, RAH has in ther contract rates for the larger E series jets. Now, why on earth their union would ever agree to negotiate a pay rate, for a plane they didn't have at the time, and a plane that everybody agrees should be a mainline plane, is just mind boggling. The reality should be plain to anybody that if regionals keep getting larger and larger planes, eventually there will be no good mainline jobs left to go to, or to have career advancement. So, when they negotiate these types of things, they are shooting current and future pilots in the foot.

It's pretty much at that point now. If your at a regional, the chances of going to a mainline job are fairly slim compared to the old career progression path. So, for many, regionals will be their career... yet they keep allowing contract for larger planes at regional work rules and pay. It's a very short sighted ill thought out process... and we're all losing as a result.
Mason32 is offline  
Old 03-12-2009, 01:48 PM
  #5523  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

I hear ya Mason. The regionals used to be a place to build time and then progress up. The problem is someone got it in their heads on the mainline side of the equation (not DAL but all mainline) that pay for training ($7K for Beech 1900 or $10K for EMB-120) for a job that paid $12K a year was justifiable because those guys were paying their dues just like the military guys paid theirs. Big mistake.

Because the pay never came up but technology sure got smaller and smaller and soon those commuters had turbofans attached to remakes of their turboprops for those "paying their dues" wages (Coex paid I think in the $20s/hr for ERJ-145 CA when those came out in 1997) and immediately every legacy carrier had the golden opportunity to provide not only jet service but high frequency jet service on routes that did not exist before.

Not to mention that the paying their dues attitude doesn't work either, these pilots are paying $50-$70K for training these days and F-16s flown by pilots paying their dues aren't going to replace DC9s, although that'd be cool and I'd sign up, especially for the single seat F-16s. And so we've got to stop treating them as a training ground because its not, these guys are fully capable of comptently flying a 737 in replacement of us. Its not something they want, but their employers will take larger and larger for less pay if offered and what else can a pilot do? They'll fly it, they can't scope themselves, thats our job.

And I am curious about a scope that was not only for seats but mileage. I wonder if that'd work, but the truth is a lot goes into what makes a route profitable and its not cut and dry and its not one size fits all on the solution. CASM isn't everything, RASM isn't either, margin is. Wherever you can maximize it you will, by whatever means necessary. I look at a route like ATL-PHF, 8 DCI flights and about 480 seats per day. Thats probably all the demand that route will hold with the stiff competition from AirTran, who started the route, and provides 4 of their 717s. We provide double frequency which is our advantage. Just replacing 8 DCIs with 3 MD88s/A320s might not be wise.

Because on a flight by flight comparison the revenue per seat mile minus the RJs pitiful cost per seat mile might be offset by a really good margin because of its frequency, better than 3 MD88s per day. So to the company, yeah the CASM sucks on an RJ but it makes its money on frequency. So its not about having the cheapest airplanes, its about the right airplane. So while I want to say scope mileage, I don't think it'd necessarily work but I wouldn't mind seeing it restricted to only 10% of DCI routes can go over 500 miles, or something like that. But this is also the problem, we let airlines and people get hooked on frequency provided by regionals and not mainline and we're stuck with it until we get some of the under MD88/73N/A319 size flying at mainline again.

I am making this up as I go. Can you tell? All I am saying is we got ourselves in this position as a pilot group and we're going to have to get creative to get out of it.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 03-12-2009 at 02:26 PM. Reason: Edited my point about the ATL-PHF route.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-12-2009, 01:59 PM
  #5524  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
I hear ya Mason. The regionals used to be a place to build time and then progress up. The problem is someone got it in their heads on the mainline side of the equation (not DAL but all mainline) that pay for training ($7K for Beech 1900 or $10K for EMB-120) for a job that paid $12K a year was justifiable because those guys were paying their dues just like the military guys paid theirs. Big mistake.

Because the pay never came up but technology sure got smaller and smaller and soon those commuters had turbofans attached to remakes of their turboprops (120) for those "paying their dues" wages (Coex paid I think in the $20s/hr for ERJ-145 CA when those came out in 1997) and immediately every legacy carrier the opportunity to provide not only jet service but high frequency jet service on routes that did not exist before. Not to mention that the paying their dues attitude doesn't work either, these pilots are paying $50-$70K for training these days and F-16s aren't going to replace DC9s, but that'd be cool, and so we've got to stop treating them as a training ground.

I look at a route like ATL-PHF, 8 DCI flights and about 480 seats per day. Thats probably all the demand that route will hold with the stiff competition from AirTran, who started the route, and provides 4 of their 717s, we provide double. On a flight by flight comparison the revenue per seat mile - the RJs pitiful cost per seat mile might not be great but as a whole that route might have really good margin because of its frequency, better than 3 MD88s per day that wouldn't have provided that extra frequency benefit.

I am making this up as I go. Can you tell? All I am saying is we got ourselves in this position as a pilot group and we're going to have to get creative to get out of it.

You are right!!!!!

ALPA national and DALPA need to stop the RJ ("b scale") growth in the United States. Legacy airline pilots need to own the flying of all aircraft 51 seats and above.

STOP the Roller-Coaster ride

in the airline pilot profession.
MD80 is offline  
Old 03-12-2009, 04:03 PM
  #5525  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Free Bird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Default

Originally Posted by MD80 View Post
You are right!!!!!
Legacy airline pilots need to own the flying of all aircraft 51 seats and above.
That needs to said again............and again, until our pilot group can realize that we need to have the mindset of taking our flying back. This is more important than a pay raise on the next contract.
Free Bird is offline  
Old 03-12-2009, 04:12 PM
  #5526  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 28
Default

Then again... regional airlines paying mainline rates for their jets would accomplish much the same thing and go a long way towards solving this problem...
gmcd05 is offline  
Old 03-12-2009, 04:24 PM
  #5527  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound View Post
As for the menu, Mogel specified that the menu grade is based on quantity, not quality. The survey was looking to see whether there would be food on board during a tarmac delay.
Delta Air Lines, JetBlue, Continental Airlines, and US Airways received an overall grade of "F" and American Airlines received an overall grade of "D."
United Airlines, Airtran and American Eagle got a "C." Alaska Airlines, Northwest Airlines and Frontier Airlines got a "B," and Southwest received an "A."
Am I missing something here??? Food during a TARMAC delay? Hell SWA doesn't have food! Too funney. Freedom of the press It's a beautiful thing baby
reddog25 is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 10:19 AM
  #5528  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by gmcd05 View Post
Then again... regional airlines paying mainline rates for their jets would accomplish much the same thing and go a long way towards solving this problem...

I disagree!

Regional pilots will always look at their job as a stepping stone to a legacy carrier. They will fight for the upgrade .vs. the career pay scale and benefits.


ALPA National and DALPA need to provide the LEADERSHIP. Make decisions that benefit the future of the airline pilot profession.
MD80 is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 10:26 AM
  #5529  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigGuns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 767-400
Posts: 797
Default

APC is back up and running... I started to go though withdrawl, shaking and crying in the corner.
BigGuns is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 10:34 AM
  #5530  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Hey guys,

I've forgotten. How do we get reimbursed for our Class 1 physicals? Does it happen automatically or do I need to fax in the receipt.

Thanks,
Buzz
buzzpat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices