Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

IFR Alternate question

Old 08-20-2009, 05:55 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Right Seat, Cessna 402/421
Posts: 44
Default IFR Alternate question

Help. I'm a CFII and I feel either a.) surrounded by idiots, or b.) an idiot myself.

This is the situation. It is a clear blue and a million day. I am filing an IFR flight plan for a flight to an airport WITHOUT an IAP. Must I file an alternate just because this airport does not have an approach? I was under the impression that if the weather at your destination was GREATER THAN the 1-2-3 rule, you were kosher to NOT file an alternate. Please shed some light on this.

Thanks.
flyboyfreye is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 06:04 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BLott4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: C56X
Posts: 146
Default

Yes.
Its kind of double speak, but 91.169 says a2 (the 1-2-3 rule) does not apply if the first airport had an IAP AND you are good to to go on 1-2-3. No IAP and you don't get to try out the 1-2-3 rule. 91.169 says you must have an ateranate unless you can escape with 91.169b 1&2.
BLott4 is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 06:08 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Right Seat, Cessna 402/421
Posts: 44
Default

So if the first airport, I.e. the DESTINATION, doesn't have an IAP, even if VMC prevails, you must file an alternate???
flyboyfreye is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 07:58 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 647
Default

Yes you do need to file an alternate airport if your destination does not have an instrument approach procedure. It is straight from FAR 91.169 (b) (1). Not worded in the best way to understand it but it's there.
bubi352 is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 08:12 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Right Seat, Cessna 402/421
Posts: 44
Default

yes, you guys are right. i'm the idiot. But man, I'm usually real good with deciphering the regs, that one I had to read and re-read at least 10 times to get it. thanks.
flyboyfreye is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 08:29 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: PA-31/left, LJ31/right
Posts: 350
Default

So do you have to file to an airport or can you file to a fix?
mshunter is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 09:20 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

Originally Posted by mshunter View Post
So do you have to file to an airport or can you file to a fix?
This is a good question. I believe a composite flight plan would get you out of that reg. File to a nearby fix, and then file the rest VFR. I'd have to revisit the regs, but this sounds feasible.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 10:29 PM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,100
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65 View Post
This is a good question. I believe a composite flight plan would get you out of that reg. File to a nearby fix, and then file the rest VFR. I'd have to revisit the regs, but this sounds feasible.
Yes you can do that. I don't think there are even any regulatory limits regarding Wx at the fix either, but common sense obviously is required. You cancel IFR at the clearance limit, unless you change your mind and desire further IFR clearance (ie back to point of origin).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 06:01 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by flyboyfreye View Post
yes, you guys are right. i'm the idiot. But man, I'm usually real good with deciphering the regs, that one I had to read and re-read at least 10 times to get it. thanks.
Unlike BLott4 I don't think it's double-speak. I think the problem is the way it's usually taught.


It's taught as though filing the alternate is the exception. IOW, "you only have to file an alternate when..."

I think the rule is more understandable if it's taught the way the rule puts it:
==============================
... each person filing an IFR flight plan must include in it the following information:
...Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an alternate airport.
==============================
IOW, "you always have to file an alternate unless certain conditions apply."

Those conditions are pretty clearly stated: an instrument approach procedure for the destination and the "1-2-3" weather rule.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 12:34 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freightdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 'Bus Driver Right Seat
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt View Post
Unlike BLott4 I don't think it's double-speak. I think the problem is the way it's usually taught.


It's taught as though filing the alternate is the exception. IOW, "you only have to file an alternate when..."

I think the rule is more understandable if it's taught the way the rule puts it:
==============================
... each person filing an IFR flight plan must include in it the following information:
...Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an alternate airport.
==============================
IOW, "you always have to file an alternate unless certain conditions apply."

Those conditions are pretty clearly stated: an instrument approach procedure for the destination and the "1-2-3" weather rule.
This is how I teach my trainees in the 99 and as a personal habit of my own. Great post NoyGonnaDoIt!!!
freightdog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorD
Flight Schools and Training
27
06-03-2009 03:45 PM
caboarder2001
Aviation Law
28
03-30-2009 03:13 PM
packageflyer
Flight Schools and Training
8
11-03-2008 03:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices