Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-08-2011, 12:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Default SIC or Dual time???

Hello!

I have hundreds of Beech King air B200&B300 co-pilot time.
But I couldn't logged these flight time as "total flight time",
due to my country(ICAO country) regulations.
(Since King air is... one men operation aircraft.)

My company had a "company rule" that "King air needs 2 pilot
for operation".(PIC & Co-pilot)
So I logged these flight time on "blank space" of my logbook.

I read checklist, contact ATC, and some time I had the flight
control as a Kingair co-pilot.
Of course I know King air aircraft system well, and I can also
fly as PIC by air law. But problems is...logging king air co-pilot time.

I heard, in US, we can add these flight time as "SIC" or "Dual"
depends on operation. And in JAR operation, I heard we can also add it...

At US FAR part61.51, there are logging time definition. There are...
Solo time, PIC time, SIC time, Instrument time, Training time.
However, the "Dual time" is not defined at part61.51.

*Could you explain the "Dual time"?
*Does FAA admit my Kingair co-pilot time as "total flight time"?
*Dual or SIC???

Thank you for your help!
blue34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 04-08-2011, 05:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: CRJ
Posts: 14,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue34 View Post
Hello!

I have hundreds of Beech King air B200&B300 co-pilot time.
But I couldn't logged these flight time as "total flight time",
due to my country(ICAO country) regulations.
(Since King air is... one men operation aircraft.)

My company had a "company rule" that "King air needs 2 pilot
for operation".(PIC & Co-pilot)
So I logged these flight time on "blank space" of my logbook.

I read checklist, contact ATC, and some time I had the flight
control as a Kingair co-pilot.
Of course I know King air aircraft system well, and I can also
fly as PIC by air law. But problems is...logging king air co-pilot time.

I heard, in US, we can add these flight time as "SIC" or "Dual"
depends on operation. And in JAR operation, I heard we can also add it...

At US FAR part61.51, there are logging time definition. There are...
Solo time, PIC time, SIC time, Instrument time, Training time.
However, the "Dual time" is not defined at part61.51.

*Could you explain the "Dual time"?
*Does FAA admit my Kingair co-pilot time as "total flight time"?
*Dual or SIC???

Thank you for your help!
No you probably cannot log it for FAA purposes. Not even total time, it was basically an airplane ride. I hope you were paid well!

If it was a single-pilot certificated King Air the only way you can log the time as SIC would be if the operation was conducted under an FAA-approved Operations Specification which required two pilots, such as a 135 or even 121 operation.

Company and insurance rules don't qualify, the requirement has to come from the FAA (FAR or OPSPEC).

As far as dual...

1. The other pilot would have to be an FAA certificated CFI.
3. He would have to sign each logbook entry, and enter his CFI number.
2. Legitimate training would need to take place. You might be able to get away with ten hours in a situation like this, but hundreds? No way, you would get your certificates revoked for logging bogus flight time.
rickair7777 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 03:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 195
Default

What he said... with one addition. Not only does the company's OPSPECs have to require two pilots, but you must also have a current PC to log the time as SIC. This means a current 135.293 check every 12 months. Some companies will even do a 61.57 ride on the 6 month interval (in our case, the Check Airman is there to do the Captains .299 rides anyway, so he gives us an IPC at the same time.)
Walkeraviator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 03:18 AM   #4 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hacker15e's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: USAF Fast Mover
Posts: 943
Default

Is there any "value" to SIC time so far as applicants to US 121 airlines are concerned?
__________________
Do ordinary things extraordinarily well
Hacker15e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 10:34 AM   #5 (permalink)
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Default

Thank you! rickair7777, Walkeraviator, Hacker15e.

>rickair7777
>1. The other pilot would have to be an FAA certificated CFI.
>2. Legitimate training would need to take place.
>3. He would have to sign each logbook entry, and enter his CFI number.

Is "Dual time" equal to "Training time"? (FAR61.51-h)

>Walkeraviator
>Not only does the company's OPSPECs have to require two pilots,
>but you must also have a current PC to log the time as SIC.
>....299 rides anyway, so he gives us an IPC at the same time.

What is the meaning of "PC" and "IPC"?
I couldn't find out from US AIM...

I heard from my american friend, He said "Kingair co-pilot time is effective" in US. I will take ATP exam in US, so I am considering...whether I should add kingair co-pilot flight time "or not". It is no problem for requirement if I don't add this flight time.

I am happy if you could give me further advice. Thank you.
blue34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 10:48 AM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 195
Default

PC is proficiency check. It is the checkride you must take to be current under FAR 135.293 to act as SIC. IPC is Instrument Proficiency Check which is a ride which "may" be required to act as PIC of an aircraft on an IFR flat plan under part 91.57.

What I was getting at is... if your company's opspecs require two pilots, and you are given a checkride annually, you can log it as SIC. This is what I do at my current job. Just a hint... if you guys operate "eligible on demand" then teh opsecs should require two pilots.
Walkeraviator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 10:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
Does NOT get weekends off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hacker15e View Post
Is there any "value" to SIC time so far as applicants to US 121 airlines are concerned?
At the Regional level, yes. They only care about TT and ME, doesn't matter if it was SIC or PIC. Although a person with 2000 hours of king air SIC time right after their commercial would have a hard time getting their ATP with a required 250 PIC.

Majors want PIC time though. So if you were ever the PIC of said king air, that is turbine time which is good.
snippercr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2011, 04:30 AM   #8 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 811
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue34 View Post
Thank you! rickair7777, Walkeraviator, Hacker15e.

>rickair7777
>1. The other pilot would have to be an FAA certificated CFI.
>2. Legitimate training would need to take place.
>3. He would have to sign each logbook entry, and enter his CFI number.

Is "Dual time" equal to "Training time"? (FAR61.51-h)
Yes. "Dual" is not a regulatory word. It's just a plain English word that is an easy way for training time to be referred to.

Quote:
>Walkeraviator
>Not only does the company's OPSPECs have to require two pilots,
>but you must also have a current PC to log the time as SIC.
>....299 rides anyway, so he gives us an IPC at the same time.

What is the meaning of "PC" and "IPC"?
I couldn't find out from US AIM...
"IPC" usually refers to the "instrument proficiency check" referred to FAR 61.57(c). "PC" generally means some kind of proficiency check and you've already seen he's referring to the "PC" that's required for all Part 135 pilots under FAR 135.293.

Quote:
I heard from my american friend, He said "Kingair co-pilot time is effective" in US. I will take ATP exam in US, so I am considering...whether I should add kingair co-pilot flight time "or not". It is no problem for requirement if I don't add this flight time.
Your friend is either thinking of SIC time under a company's Part 135 OpSpecs, one of the discrete other rules that allow logging of SIC time or he's just wrong. Wrong is pretty common in the logging time area.

This has been said before but to try to simplify a bit, there are two times that a pilot may log legitimate SIC time and you can find them both in 61.51(f): (a) when acting as the SIC of an aircraft that required more than one pilot under the certification rules for the aircraft, and (b) when acting as the SIC in an operation that requires more than one pilot under the "regulations under which the flight is being conducted."

The King Air is an airplane that is certified for single-pilot operations. So, one can only log legitimate SIC time in a King Air if the FAA rules (not company policy; not insurance companies) if the operation require more than one pilot.

Those rules may arise from a specific regulation like FAR 135.101, which requires an SIC in passenger-carrying IFR operations or from an "Operations Specification" which is a set of written rules for a specific company that is issued as part of a company's Part 135 certificate.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2011, 07:48 AM   #9 (permalink)
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: CRJ
Posts: 14,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hacker15e View Post
Is there any "value" to SIC time so far as applicants to US 121 airlines are concerned?
The latest trend is for middle-tier majors airlines like DAL, CAL, US, etc to hire some pilots with only turbine SIC, or less than 1000 TPIC. So there is some value, and you may see more of this as regionals stagnate and you get guys with ten years in the right seat of an RJ.
rickair7777 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2011, 12:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 742 Driver
Posts: 1,045
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
The latest trend is for middle-tier majors airlines like DAL, CAL, US, etc to hire some pilots with only turbine SIC, or less than 1000 TPIC.
How many of those where non-legacy, non-military white males ?
I can guarantee you the number is very close to zero.
Thedude is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Logging time when acting as a Check Airman lolwut Major 17 07-12-2010 12:48 PM
Tprop PIC time vs SIC jet time utedrummer Regional 38 12-17-2007 09:35 AM
NetJets Interview...SIC Time Logged N636DL Fractional 0 10-18-2007 02:10 PM
Logging SIC vs. Dual Received? Pilot41 Hangar Talk 1 08-10-2007 05:20 AM
A320 SIC Time vs. TurboProp PIC Time? Islandhopper Major 28 03-06-2007 03:01 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 PM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.