Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Welcome to the Airline Pilot Central Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!

Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Foreign
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Foreign Airlines that hire U.S. pilots

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2008, 09:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,143
Default Quantas oxygen cylinder caused explosion

I can't imagine what would make that tank blow. I seen scuba tanks dropped 25ft and nothing.

Quote:
CANBERRA, Australia - An oxygen cylinder caused the explosion that blew a car-sized hole in a Qantas jet last month, forcing an emergency landing, air safety officials said Friday.
ADVERTISEMENT

The release of the interim report by Julian Walsh, acting executive director of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau, confirmed earlier suspicions by investigators that an exploding oxygen tank was the cause.

The Boeing 747-438 aircraft, carrying 365 people, was flying over the South China Sea July 5 when the explosion blew a hole in the fuselage five-feet in diameter, causing a loss of cabin pressure.

Walsh said one of the seven emergency oxygen cylinders below the cabin floor had exploded, but did not say what caused the tank to burst.

"On the basis of the physical damage to the aircraft's forward cargo hold and cabin, it is evident that the number 4 passenger oxygen cylinder sustained a failure that allowed a sudden and complete release of the pressurized contents," Walsh told reporters in releasing the report.

The plane — en route from London to Melbourne, Australia — rapidly descended thousands of feet and flew about 300 miles to Manila, where it made a successful emergency landing.

No one was injured, but questions were raised about the much-lauded safety of Qantas Airways, which has never lost a jet aircraft because of an accident.

In the weeks after the incident, Qantas planes experienced a number of other problems, including a loss of hydraulic fuel that led to an emergency landing, failure of landing gear, and detached panels.

The problems prompted the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Australia's aviation agency, to launch a review of Qantas Airways' safety standards.

Qantas earlier this month temporarily pulled six planes from service because of irregularities in maintenance records. Qantas said it was a record-keeping issue and there were no safety implications for the aircraft.
ToiletDuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 07:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 326
Default

Defect in the bottle created while it was manufactured? Perhaps the contents inside were not 100% oxygen? Could a strong static discharge ignite the contents? Corrision?
KC10 FATboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 09:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Jet-A Burner
Posts: 444
Default

If pressure was too high, shouldn't the blow out valve have popped first? This will be interesting....
__________________
Fly The Contract & Nothing More
Mason32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 10:17 AM   #4 (permalink)
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: B757/767 F/O
Posts: 3
Default

Here's the report from the Aussie gov't. It's pretty detailed and has some interesting pics of the damage.

http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/...053_Prelim.pdf
Pozrategearup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 10:48 AM   #5 (permalink)
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: CRJ
Posts: 6,424
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
Defect in the bottle created while it was manufactured? Perhaps the contents inside were not 100% oxygen? Could a strong static discharge ignite the contents? Corrision?

The usual problem in these cases is internal corrosion, probably due to water build up. A manufacturing defect is unlikely since the bottle was hydo-tested before entering service, and on a routine basis thereafter. It should have had routine borescope inspections too.

Static could not ignite the contents inside a metal bottle...no flow path for the current. Also (except for really exotic applications like spacecraft monopropellants), flammable mixtures are never stored in bottles...otherwise ignition at the output would likely flash back into the bottle

Oxygen itself is not flammable or explosive anyway. It would be almost unbelievable if a breathing oxygen bottle were accidentently filled with a flammable mixture...there is a higher standard of handling for breathing and medical O2.

If the cyclinder was composite, and not all-metal, it's possible that the composite wrap was damaged by a sharp impact or by corrosive fluids.

If the cyclinder was weakened significantly it's possible that the cyclinder failed at a pressure below the relief valve setting.

Another remote possibility is brittle fracture. Steel can crack spontaneously at cold temperatures. We design steel products to have a low or extremely low risk of BF (depending on the application), but it cannot be totally eliminated.

From an engineering perspective, this is very odd. Given the application (high mx standards, no salt water) the odds are against this event occoring. My guess would physically damaged composite wrap, but those bottles in the pictures look like aluminum from a distance.
rickair7777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 12:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Assistant Puddle Jumper
Posts: 655
Default

Improper filling could weaken it. Then tanks are filled too quickly, they can heat up too much too fast. That can make the metal more brittle (or so I was told way back when I worked the ramp).
__________________
Vote for the union of your choice, but VOTE!
FlyJSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 12:42 PM   #7 (permalink)
Thanks for the jumpseat!
 
dudewannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: MD-11 galley operator
Posts: 201
Default

Queensland And Northern Territory Air Service.

There is no U in "QANTAS" mate!
dudewannabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 12:45 PM   #8 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain
Posts: 91
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyJSH View Post
Improper filling could weaken it. Then tanks are filled too quickly, they can heat up too much too fast. That can make the metal more brittle (or so I was told way back when I worked the ramp).
If you are filling something with a gas by pumping it in with a compressor that will heat it up, but when you fill an O2 bottle from a higher pressure bottle, the O2 coming in will be expanding and cooling off.

For those who questioned the bottle construction, the Australian safety report says it was one piece steel. See the link in Posrates post, page 16.

Joe
joepilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 12:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: F/O
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joepilot View Post
If you are filling something with a gas by pumping it in with a compressor that will heat it up, but when you fill an O2 bottle from a higher pressure bottle, the O2 coming in will be expanding and cooling off.

For those who questioned the bottle construction, the Australian safety report says it was one piece steel. See the link in Posrates post, page 16.

Joe
Actually it's the other way around. I don't know the physics behind it but as a former MX guy we used explosion proof cages to fill new crew O2 bottles. Believe me, they were warm after filling from 0 psi.
thndr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 01:39 PM   #10 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 326
Default

The physics is (simplified) ... oxygen molecules are being squeezed together, running into one another. That creates friction which produces heat.
KC10 FATboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2007 DreamLaunch Media Ltd

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7