You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you're a working pilot, please join our free community and you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you don't want to register (or not a working pilot), you can still use the Google search box in the upper left of this screen to search all forum posts!
As I return to the civilian world, and try to gain some comprehension of the FARs, I did have these questions:
1) With reference to a fractional jet operating under FAR Part 91 (K) 91.1039, are IFR weather mins and climb gradients DIRECTIVE or not? (Which sounds like an interview question to me...)
2) Why do fractionals sometimes operate Pt 91 and sometimes Pt 135?
If you have a Jepp departure in front of you and you need the gradient, no math required. Just go to the 100kt column of the fpm req box and move the decimal over two spots.
Actually, at NJ we operate under 3 rules. Ferry flights are Part 91, owner flights are Part 91K, and when we carry Marquis Card people, we are under Part 135. 135 is the charter rule. 91K is a special part of 91 that addresses fractional operations and plain 91 are the rules everyone has to follow unless some stricter rule applies. Clear as mud.
Actually, at NJ we operate under 3 rules. Ferry flights are Part 91, owner flights are Part 91K, and when we carry Marquis Card people, we are under Part 135. 135 is the charter rule. 91K is a special part of 91 that addresses fractional operations and plain 91 are the rules everyone has to follow unless some stricter rule applies. Clear as mud.
Sailaway, perfect answer to my second question; what about my first?
1) With reference to a fractional jet operating under FAR Part 91 (K) 91.1039, are IFR weather mins and climb gradients DIRECTIVE or not? (Which sounds like an interview question to me...)
Zach
Just an opinion, but 91.1039 simply put fractional operators on parity with 135 operators….
So, it’s a requirement (directive) to comply with the reg.
I seem to remember when the NPRM for subpart K was written (essentially by EJA, well RJS), this wasn’t the intended rule. Thankfully, the FAA listened to the input from pilots and changed the wording…
good info, thanks. I've heard an interview question about pax byob'ing. it was asked for 135 ops (must be provided by company). what about 91k for owners: could they bring their own bottle of champagne for example, or their favorite scotch??