Search
Notices
Fractional NetJets, FlexJet, etc

To All Fractional Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2013, 08:03 AM
  #21  
Retired Doug herder
 
hvydriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Former DC8 73 Capt DHLAirways/Astar. Retired
Posts: 424
Angry

Originally Posted by F224 View Post
Having been in two different unions, one a small unaligned association at a regional and later ALPA (over 20 years), and having walked the picket lines in 1998 and was a key member of the Strike Committee I fee I am qualified to comment.

1) Up until ALPA aligned with the AFL-CIO it was the most respected labor group in the world. Any committee member could get an audience with any Congressman/Senator on short notice and labor relations were secondary to flight safety. Also, prior to alignment with the AFL-CIO; the President of ALPA was paid their company wages (IE; if you were a B-727 Captain, what is what you were paid), today, ALPA's President is paid more than $750k per year and most ALPA field office staff (office manager and secretaries) make more than what regional jet captains are paid.

2) ALPA (and the other groups) are very effective at legal defense of pilots in disputes with there companies and the FAA or NTSB.

3) Wages have been declining relative to inflation for ALPA members, but non-ALPA pilots have seen them maintain or increase relative to inflation.

4) From a cost benefit standpoint, many new pilots would be hard pressed to justify economically the cost of dues vs the benefits.

5) Most companies can prevent problems of having a working environment making pilots want to organize into a union by doing a few things; a) treat them as partners in the businesses success, b) pay competitive wages with reasonable benefits, c) provide a legal defense plan for the pilots that covers FAA enforcement actions and d) ensure competitive and affordable long term care and disability plans are available for the staff.

6) Most pilots can ensure they have long and successful careers if they will do a few things like avoiding outside of work legal trouble and always asking themselves if what they are doing at any given moment is in the customers and employers best interest?

This is not an all encompassing list, but covers many of the major issues I have seen in a 30+ year career.

I am not interested in the "Noble Intent" talking point. In realville, where the world actually lives, success has not been based on noble intent, but instead on actual results motivated by vested self interest. Any attempt to try and judge things based on "our good intentions" and not actual results shows a lack of understanding of basic economics and human nature.
+1!

DHL/Astar 1989-2010. Chair and Co-chair of various committees for 20 years, participant in numerous picket lines, etc. With ALPA, it is possible to negotiate contractual improvements, but where the rubber meets the road, there is nothing but pitiful incompetence. Which would be ok, if it didn't destroy peoples lives and careers in the process.
hvydriver is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 08:16 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,075
Default

I can't speak to 1108 specifically, however, after 14 years and three IBT locals, in two of which I was deeply involved, I can say unequivocally that I am very impressed with how IBT supports and represents pilots.

I am not in the least bit favorably impressed, but impressed I am.
Hetman is offline  
Old 01-30-2013, 02:15 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 400
Default

Originally Posted by F224 View Post
\
I am not interested in the "Noble Intent" talking point. In realville, where the world actually lives, success has not been based on noble intent, but instead on actual results motivated by vested self interest. Any attempt to try and judge things based on "our good intentions" and not actual results shows a lack of understanding of basic economics and human nature.
In the REAL "realview", intent is not only important, but crucial. Wow! For you to callously disregard the very source of one's motivation is shallow beyond belief.

I'm not sure you understand basic economics or human nature as much as you think you do. If only concerning yourself with superficiality and appearance floats your boat, then you don't have much a foothold in such dialogue.

There are countless great men and women that, had it not been for intent, they would have just been another member of the peanut gallery.....like some here.
Ludicrous Speed is offline  
Old 01-31-2013, 04:48 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F224's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: B757 Ca, Retired.
Posts: 195
Default

Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed View Post
In the REAL "realview", intent is not only important, but crucial. Wow! For you to callously disregard the very source of one's motivation is shallow beyond belief.

I'm not sure you understand basic economics or human nature as much as you think you do. If only concerning yourself with superficiality and appearance floats your boat, then you don't have much a foothold in such dialogue.

There are countless great men and women that, had it not been for intent, they would have just been another member of the peanut gallery.....like some here.
Bottom line is results matter, not good intentions, don't confuse motivation with intentions. I also know that when you find the money, you will find the motive and when it comes to unions, it's all about maintaining the profitability for those at the top of the union food chain; it's elected officers and business managers. It's easy to forget that every enterprise is still a "business", including unions. Despite the constant drumbeat of it being all about the "workers" by those who are promoting the business.
F224 is offline  
Old 02-04-2013, 09:28 AM
  #25  
On Reserve
 
KCFR8PILOT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Phenom 300 PIC
Posts: 15
Default

I think something missing here is the attention to why a singular Local is cold calling for members... That is exactly my biggest concern with unions, their goal is protecting said union, not said member. The payrolls on the top as mentioned by F224 are the only example you need, if you need more read up on the boilermakers in Kansas KS.
KCFR8PILOT is offline  
Old 02-06-2013, 10:59 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thunderpig's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Retired Mil...ready to start the grind
Posts: 249
Default

All you need to know about unions and what they have devolved into is perfectly demonstrated by what is happening in Michigan. The unions are actively talking about suing members who decide to eschew union membership, according to the laws now in place. Much like the gov't, what little good they have done has long been overwritten by all the chaff at the top...
Thunderpig is offline  
Old 02-07-2013, 01:05 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: NJA CE680 terminated
Posts: 124
Default

In MI remember that most of the activity is gov't employee unions. That's a whole different bucket of worms. IMHO
Sailaway is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 08:03 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 54
Default

Just to be clear, as the originator of this thread, I am not a representative of the Teamsters but rather a line pilot at a Unionized fractional who would like to see the pilot groups of our competitors command what they deserve in compensation, protections and QOL. Fundamentally, we are all part of a collective group who happen to work for the benefit of different organizations. And as it stands, there are many who are selling our collective group short by working sub-standard schedules for sub-standard pay and protection. As I believe it is imperative for the integrity of our group as a whole (and all of our livlihoods for that matter) to have each group raise the bar for the others, I am simply putting a resource out there for the use of those who would be interested in this under-taking. Currently, we have many groups selling the collective leverage of pilots in our industry short by failing to stand up and demand what they deserve for the service they deliver. Anyone in this segment of our industry knows how demanding it can be to successfully operate in the fractional environment. And with the skill and experience that is required should come professional contracts.

Again, this is simply how I see it and I have posted a resource for those looking to rightfully take a stepping stone job and make it the career they deserve.
DWS1 is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:43 PM
  #29  
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
ImEbee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Burrito Bomber
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by DWS1 View Post
Just to be clear, as the originator of this thread, I am not a representative of the Teamsters but rather a line pilot at a Unionized fractional who would like to see the pilot groups of our competitors command what they deserve in compensation, protections and QOL. Fundamentally, we are all part of a collective group who happen to work for the benefit of different organizations. And as it stands, there are many who are selling our collective group short by working sub-standard schedules for sub-standard pay and protection. As I believe it is imperative for the integrity of our group as a whole (and all of our livlihoods for that matter) to have each group raise the bar for the others, I am simply putting a resource out there for the use of those who would be interested in this under-taking. Currently, we have many groups selling the collective leverage of pilots in our industry short by failing to stand up and demand what they deserve for the service they deliver. Anyone in this segment of our industry knows how demanding it can be to successfully operate in the fractional environment. And with the skill and experience that is required should come professional contracts.

Again, this is simply how I see it and I have posted a resource for those looking to rightfully take a stepping stone job and make it the career they deserve.
I think most of us who responded understood that. The flaw in your argument, so to speak, is that a union will indeed "raise the bar". I can't think of any recent circumstance where a pilot group organized and the result was better compensation and/or work rules. I think the reason most groups have organized recently is because they have seen an erosion of their working environment and see a union as a means of mitigating that. Frankly, I can't think of any recent circumstances where organization of a pilot group has transformed a company from a stepping stone into a career.
ImEbee is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 08:37 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: PIC
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by ImEbee View Post
I think most of us who responded understood that. The flaw in your argument, so to speak, is that a union will indeed "raise the bar". I can't think of any recent circumstance where a pilot group organized and the result was better compensation and/or work rules. I think the reason most groups have organized recently is because they have seen an erosion of their working environment and see a union as a means of mitigating that. Frankly, I can't think of any recent circumstances where organization of a pilot group has transformed a company from a stepping stone into a career.
The closest recent example is probably Omni Air. The Omni pilots voted in the IBT and eventually got a first contract that significantly improved their pay and conditions. Most would not call it a career job yet, but it was a big first step and that first contract hasn't run its course yet.

But there are also lots of examples of the union making the wrong choices. ALPA in particular has had a terrible track record since 2001 (TWA, Airtran, US Airways mergers), and I believe one organization can't represent regionals, majors, and to a lesser extent fractionals, without a conflict of interest as gains for one group are often at the expense of another.

The union issue is not nearly as simple as those firmly one either side make it out to be. There are a lot of nuances to labor relations and those saying that they'd like the ability to go beyond the limits of the contract to help a customer when it is legal have a very strong point. So do the ones saying they want protections from legal action or being fired for a personality clash. Each group needs to weigh the options and decide what works for them.
polymox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TruthHurts
United
64
04-02-2012 10:23 AM
TruthHurts
United
57
03-22-2012 10:03 AM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices