Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-30-2010, 09:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
pants on the ground
 
mmaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: back seat
Posts: 1,201
Default Mach 0.995

Gulfstream's 650 hits Mach 0.995

AOPA Online: Gulfstream’s G650 hits Mach 0.995

Gulfstream Aerospace’s new G650 reached Mach 0.995 in flutter tests, a feat that prompts the company to dub its top-of-the-line airplane the world’s fastest civil aircraft. The speed was attained as part of the G650’s certification flight test program. Gulfstream experimental test pilots Tom Horne and Gary Freeman, along with flight test engineer Bill Osborne, pitched the airplane’s nose down 16 to 18 degrees below the horizon to hit the target speed. The maneuver was designed to test the airplane’s natural flutter resistance when the wings, tail, and control surfaces were subjected to vibrations from onboard flutter exciters. The vibration frequencies exerted on the airplane ranged from two hertz (cycles per second) to 58 hertz, or about as fast as a fluorescent light flickers.
The airplane performed as expected. Horne said, “The airplane is very predictable. It’s very easy to control and get precise control at those speeds. The airplane response has matched the expectations of our engineers, and we’ve been able to easily fly the test conditions and march through the test plan.”
The four airplanes participating in the G650 flight test program—which began on Nov. 25, 2009—have completed more than 170 flights and 575 flight-test hours.
__________________
99 bottles of beer on the wall......
mmaviator is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 08-31-2010, 12:14 AM   #2 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Asst. button pusher
Posts: 1,212
Default

And this is progress? Douglas took a DC-8 supersonic in the 60s and TWA went supersonic over Detroit in a 727.
Twin Wasp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 05:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 2,933
Default

I would say with all the modern restrictions and "safety" crap, I guess you could call it a small victory
__________________
Sometimes working Harder is working Smarter
Ewfflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 06:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
Prime Minister
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: The 'Deid
Posts: 12,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
TWA went supersonic over Detroit in a 727.
I'd like to hear the story there...
rickair7777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 07:20 AM   #5 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Asst. button pusher
Posts: 1,212
Default

I went and read the NTSB report http://libraryonline.erau.edu/online...s/AAR81-08.pdf and it turns out I had missunderstood a comment I'd heard. Turns out they only exceeded the aircraft's mach limit, .90, while doing a split S over Saginaw, MI. They rolled inverted, went 90 degrees nose down, hit .96 mach and then pulled 6 Gs on the pull out.
Twin Wasp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 07:27 AM   #6 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 451
Default

16-18DND? Who cares?

Will it out-run a X in level flight? If not, it still isn't the fastest civil aircraft. Sorry.

-mini
minitour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 08:38 AM   #7 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
X Rated's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: MD80
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by minitour View Post
16-18DND? Who cares?

Will it out-run a X in level flight? If not, it still isn't the fastest civil aircraft. Sorry.

-mini

I agree, the X was rumored to have exceeded Mach 1 during flight testing.

X
X Rated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 08:44 AM   #8 (permalink)
My word is my pride.
 
CaptainCarl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: πmp.
Posts: 1,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by minitour View Post
16-18DND? Who cares?

Will it out-run a X in level flight? If not, it still isn't the fastest civil aircraft. Sorry.

-mini
Quote:
Originally Posted by X Rated View Post
I agree, the X was rumored to have exceeded Mach 1 during flight testing.

X
Six in one, half dozen the other. I'll ride or fly in either. Someone come get me when we can break the sound barrier for business/commercial use.
CaptainCarl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 09:39 AM   #9 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCarl View Post
Six in one, half dozen the other. I'll ride or fly in either.
I can't say for certain how I'd feel if offered a position actually doing it, but from the tight confines of the light jet, I'd take it over the big stuff any day.

Big plane = big suitcase.

-mini
minitour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 10:02 AM   #10 (permalink)
Meet Stanley
 
Grumble's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,473
Default

If you're getting paid by the hour, give me the slowest jet out there.
Grumble is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Citation X Question stinsonjr Technical 41 01-18-2012 11:19 AM
FDX MD-10 2008 Incident at HOXIE JetPiedmont Cargo 40 09-28-2010 03:51 PM
Mach 896 JetPhotos Your Photos and Videos 0 04-12-2010 06:39 PM
Mach speed vs IAS - Flight Sim X question Dan64456 Technical 19 06-25-2009 10:25 AM
ATP Written - convert Mach number to TAS Airfix Regional 17 04-28-2009 03:37 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:27 AM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.