Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

This is criminal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2016, 05:26 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default This is criminal

....and just disgusts me to the depths of my soul.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/30/us...-benefits.html
SayAlt is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:28 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

A question can be made as to whether these people should have received anything other than a honorable discharge and that is question for the UCMJ/Legal system to decide. But once that case has run its' course - serve with honor, get the benefits. Do not serve with honor, don't get the benefits.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:39 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

As a taxpayer, I believe if someone serves they should get the benefits, particularly if they served in a combat capacity.

And this irrespective of the status of their discharge.

As a taxpayer, I feel we owe that to our vets, who already are paid (and treated) like crap.

In particular...

The G. I. Bill instructed the veterans agency to care for veterans if their service was “other than dishonorable.” The agency interpreted this as excluding “other than honorable” discharges.

Though veterans can apply for a category upgrade, the process is confusing, inconsistent and slow.

Only 10 percent of veterans are successful; a decision takes, on average, four years, the report said. In some regions, all requests are rejected.
This is outrageous.
SayAlt is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:42 AM
  #4  
Back on line
 
awacs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Out of the sim, back in the real!
Posts: 99
Default NO

We sent young men and women into combat. It is our burden to help these people, PERIOD.

For if not, then what is our military to us? A group of mercenaries we pull out of low income families to do our fighting?

NO.

It matters not if people don't live up to some standard. We sent them, they went and got hurt. They gave what they could, and I respect that.


Now it's MY turn to respect them.



AWACS
awacs is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:45 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

^^^^^^^^ That's gotdam right. ^^^^^^^^^^^
SayAlt is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 06:59 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

It absolutely does depend on your character of service.

As examples - one wartime, the other peacetime (well...Cold War), these two servicemen DO NOT deserve a single red cent of benefits from the VA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowe_Bergdahl

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clayton_J._Lonetree

Desertion and treason?
For a person who has served HONORABLY to be treated the same, and get no different benefits than either of the above mentioned former service members, would be an injustice that should deserve attention.

They broke the law, went through an established legal process, and were dealt punishments IAW with those regulations.

I agree that this needs further investigating:
The G. I. Bill instructed the veterans agency to care for veterans if their service was “other than dishonorable.” The agency interpreted this as excluding “other than honorable” discharges
Those two characterizations are different.
DISHONORABLE and OTHER THAN HONORABLE are two wholly different animals; and if the VA is misinterpreting this characterization than it should be brought up and corrected.
If the law needs to be changed, then there is a (painfully slow) process for that too.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 07:02 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post

Desertion and treason?

I can agree with that. The MAJOR offenses.

But absent without leave following a combat tour?

Gimme (or, more specifically, them) a break.
SayAlt is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 07:03 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt View Post
I can agree with that. The MAJOR offenses.

But absent without leave following a combat tour?

Gimme (or, more specifically, them) a break.
See my edited post to address part of your earlier post.
I agree that it isn't a clean sweep.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 03-30-2016, 07:07 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default

Noted, and appreciate your comments.

I am sensitive about VA stuff.

Did you hear about the Navy vet who set himself on fire outside of the VA the other day, leaving behind a wife and 2 young children?

Broke my heart right then and there.

https://www.rt.com/usa/337487-vetera...lation-jersey/


I know plenty of vets commit suicide and it's a big problem. Seems to me the VA is making the problem worse, not better.
SayAlt is offline  
Old 04-07-2016, 12:59 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default


VA bosses in 7 states manipulated vets' wait times for care

Supervisors instructed schedulers to falsify patient wait times at Veterans Affairs' medical facilities in at least seven states, according to newly released investigation reports from the department’s inspector general.

The reports detail for the first time since the Phoenix VA wait-time scandal in 2014 how widespread scheduling manipulation was throughout the VA. Investigators previously have said manipulation was “systemic” but they did not identify which facilities had problems and how serious they were.

The investigations found that employees at 40 VA medical facilities in 19 states and Puerto Rico regularly “zeroed out” veteran wait times, which masked growing demand as new waves of veterans returned from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and as Vietnam veterans aged and needed more health care.

The inspector general launched investigations of more than 100 facilities after the Phoenix scandal in 2014. In some cases, they found manipulation had been going on for as long as a decade. In others, it had been just a few years. Roughly half of the 70 newly released reports are from investigations that were completed more than a year ago. They were released following a Freedom of Information Act request from USA TODAY.

More than 480,000 veterans were waiting more than 30 days for an appointment as of March 15, public VA data shows.


VA bosses in 7 states manipulated vets' wait times for care






See the results of VA wait-time probes in your state

See the results of VA wait-time probes in your state

SayAlt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Denver
Career Questions
38
10-16-2012 02:43 PM
vagabond
Aviation Law
2
09-22-2008 11:56 AM
Airman
Pilot Health
4
08-15-2008 08:07 PM
Canyonman
Major
1
05-07-2007 04:14 AM
Caelum Deus
Major
34
02-03-2007 04:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices