Quote:
Originally Posted by NGINEWHOISWHAT
I think SWest sees UAL as an easy target, but I'm not buying that snake oil just yet. Time will tell. We all have to worry about Skybust and Slut. As far as Swest going international, I'm not buying that either. Maybe Mexico and Canada or the Islands, but it would be a code share to Europe or Asia and they would certainly not crush that market.
|
Agreed. SWA could fly to the islands or Mexico, but technically that's not international since the industry includes North America in the domestic route system.
It's not likely that the various long range 737 variants are going to get ETOPS certification for an overwater flight to Europe any time soon. I've never flown one, but I doubt they even have the legs for it to begin with. I'm not putti ng much stock in SWA going "international". Even if they found a way, they're not going to "crush" the market. Delta is currently crushing the market flying 767-300ERs to every major city in Europe, including Eastern Europe. SWA can't touch that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NGINEWHOISWHAT
It is kind of ironic that Swest helped to depress domestic yields and has now fallen victom to the situation it helped to create. Go figure.
Tom
|
Isn't it? The reason is that others have copied SWA's business model and even improved it. I don't beoieve JBlue has reached critical mass yet. Frontier is still a regional player, and Virgin hasn't left the ground yet. Airtran, however, made a hybrid of SWA's point to point flying, and traditional hub flying, and it seems to have worked very well. Especially if they get a hold of Midwest, they are going to be a very formidable national player for everyone.
Which brings us back to the question- why is SWA going for the legacy carriers? Are they admitting that they can't beat Airtran at their own game, so they're going after the dinosaurs?