Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Major Legacy, National, and LCC

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-30-2008, 12:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 250
Default Attention United Pilots

Just received this through company email. Jumpseat wars are no bueno.

Quote:
From Jumpseat Coordinator

Important Letter to United Pilots

June 30, 2008

To United Airlines pilots:

On behalf of the Jumpseat Committees representing all of the carriers flying as United Express, welcome aboard. Unfortunately, this letter has been provided to you because you will likely be affected by a difficult decision, reluctantly arrived at by the United Express (UAX) pilots. Over the last couple of years, United Airlines (UAL) has made changes to the gate jumpseating and priority software programs. Several of these changes have adversely affected not only the UAX pilots, but also the UAL pilots, as well. There is widespread confusion and frustration amongst many of the pilots regarding how the gate computer sorts priorities for jumpseat requests. Based upon the UAX agreement tables, jumpseat requests on UAX flights are supposed to be processed like this:

1. On their own flights, UAX pilots are sorted first, in order of their seniority.
2. UAL pilots and “other” UAX pilots are sorted next, in order of their check-in.
3. Non UAL/UAX pilots (“offline pilots”) are then sorted, in order of their check-in.

HOWEVER, the current software being used by UAL does NOT sort jumpseat requests in this order. Instead, all jumpseat requests are sorted as if the flight were a mainline UAL flight. This means that UAX pilots are being bumped by UAL pilots on their own UAX flights. The computer software also sorts some UAX pilots as if they were offline pilots, even on their own flights. Despite nine (9) months of repeated appeals to UAL management, and despite the fact that a minor software change would solve this issue (simply change the computers to recognize the carriers’ flight number) UAX carriers have recently been told that UAL will not fix this blatant degradation of our jumpseat agreements because to do so would not generate revenue for UAL. This position is untenable.

We have now sent a detailed letter to UALPA’s MEC, addressing these very important issues, and we have provided UALPA with specific examples of where UAL has made non-revenue generating changes to the gate software. The UAX pilots have respectfully requested that the gate jumpseat software be fixed within thirty (30) days. Regrettably, if UAL does not fix the jumpseat software within thirty (30) days, UAX pilots will be left with no other choice but to deny all UAL pilots any requests for the jumpseat, regardless of aircraft tail-colors beginning 08/31/08.

On behalf of all UAX pilots, we sincerely hope that we will not be forced to deny any UAL pilot a ride, as we are mindful of the fact that many UAL pilots will be negatively impacted. To that end, we are simply asking that you immediately call or email your MEC to let them know how important your UAX commute is, and to help us all obtain a fair and just resolution. Thank you for your professionalism and active cooperation.

Signed, the pilots of:

Chautauqua Airlines
Colgan Airlines
Go Jets Airlines
Mesa Air Group
Shuttle America
SkyWest Airlines
bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 06-30-2008, 12:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Gear Monkey
 
JoeyMeatballs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 9,780
Default

I wonder how many will actually follow this....why should United Pilots have to pay for the inadequacy of the computer system in place for jumpseating? However rules are rules and jumpseating priority is jumpseating priority....................another reason they should not have given up on scope
JoeyMeatballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:12 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 1,147
Default

Long thread on this in the regionals...

All UAX carriers will be denying jumpseat to UAL mainline pilots on 8/31/08
FDXer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
Fun Officer
 
RockBottom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 506
Default

Jumpseats should never be used as a tool in political or company disputes. Especially pitting one pilot group against another! I can understand the UA Express pilots' frustration, but this act is very childish, IMO.
RockBottom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockBottom View Post
Jumpseats should never be used as a tool in political or company disputes. Especially pitting one pilot group against another! I can understand the UA Express pilots' frustration, but this act is very childish, IMO.
This isn't really political as much as it is about reciprocity and honoring the jumpseat agreements that are in place.

UAALPA was the one that made the policy change to give their pilots priority over UAX pilots on UAX not UA management.

UAX Jumpseat coordinators have worked for over a year to reverse this policy, including memo to gate agents and Captains checking the gate. And, still UAX pilots are being left at the gate while UAL pilots aren't. UAL MEC continues to fail to even address the issue. So as long as UAALPA refuses to work with the UAX carriers this is something that they have brought upon themselves.

That is why this letter was sent out.
Thinking man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:32 PM   #6 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 16
Angry Whatta bunch a chumps!

Since the union can't get a damn thing done with management they need to resort to fighting amongst themselves?

Here is an idea, how about keeping the mainline flying on UAX routes and parking RJs instead of putting 950 UAL guys on the street.
drvannostren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
embpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 76
Default re

Since when do you other UAX carriers want to be grouped with GOjet scumbags? LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!! BTW I noticed TSA is not on the list of UAX carriers that sent the letter.
embpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 02:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
pokey9554's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Cessna 150
Posts: 463
Default

As a CA on a UAX carrier, everybody is welcome in my jumpseat anytime. Even on 8/31. Just bring your sense of humor.
__________________
Beauty Fades.... Dumb is forever.
pokey9554 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 02:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Gear Monkey
 
JoeyMeatballs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 9,780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drvannostren View Post
Since the union can't get a damn thing done with management they need to resort to fighting amongst themselves?

Here is an idea, how about keeping the mainline flying on UAX routes and parking RJs instead of putting 950 UAL guys on the street.
IF ONLY MAINLINE GUYS DIDNT GIVE UP SCOPE
JoeyMeatballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 02:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
Invisible Man's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
IF ONLY MAINLINE GUYS DIDNT GIVE UP SCOPE
If only the commuters wouldn't fly for nothing.
It's the chicken and the egg argument.
IM
Invisible Man is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recent USAirways Merger Facts. Other Pilots Should Read Jettubby Mergers and Acquisitions 14 04-03-2008 06:56 AM
Another age 60 pilot's view joel payne Age 65 Rule 62 11-05-2007 09:16 AM
Is It Retroactive? Roberto Age 65 Rule 10 08-08-2007 01:47 PM
Pilots fighting age 60 rule RockBottom Age 65 Rule 77 06-01-2007 07:21 AM
United Drops Air Wisconsin Gordon C Regional 0 04-07-2005 10:44 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:09 AM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.