Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Register FAQ Advertising Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Major Legacy, National, and LCC

 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums

    Already registered? Login above

OR
 
To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
the largest community of airline pilots in the U.S. and beyond.

The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-26-2011, 12:07 PM   #69091 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I don't believe are Boeing contract allowed us to resell a unconfirmed position. What we did do however is resell a bunch (30 Plus) 737-800's after purchasing them. The planes went from the production line to the new airline without Delta ever flying them however we technically took delivery and then sold the aircraft.
Yes, but rather than sell them for a premium, Delta took some very significant charges to the income statement, as they were sold at a loss.
Wasatch Phantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertising above will not show if you are a registered user.
Old 06-26-2011, 12:16 PM   #69092 (permalink)
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 7,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Columbia View Post
Carl's retirement plan.
Nah...I want my low passes to be inverted.

I didn't think there were any 747SP's flying anymore.

Carl
__________________
I'm an airline pilot - so I got that goin for me....which is nice.
Carl Spackler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 12:21 PM   #69093 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 690
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Nah...I want my low passes to be inverted.

I didn't think there were any 747SP's flying anymore.

Carl
Steve Wynn has two as exec acft parked in KLAS
__________________
take my advice I don't use it any ways
Fly4hire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 12:31 PM   #69094 (permalink)
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 7,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly4hire View Post
Steve Wynn has two as exec acft parked in KLAS
Wow!!

Carl
__________________
I'm an airline pilot - so I got that goin for me....which is nice.
Carl Spackler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 01:55 PM   #69095 (permalink)
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 8,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cni187 View Post
Almost as sexy as underboob. It also makes climbing in the Mad Dog depressing

Wow.... really? OK.. for $60/hour... the left seat is yours. Wanna rethink that "sexy" comment? Personally I find nothing about a bunch of designers engineering me into an airplane as a redundant system as being "sexy". Yup.. Boeing guy here... always have been... and God (And Delta Air Lines) willing, always will be.
tsquare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 01:57 PM   #69096 (permalink)
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 8,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
Sidestick is marketed to increase safety? whaaa

Also, got to love:

"RNP0.1 capability: allows the aircraft to fly routes with great precision"

Subtle indication of the future?

Yup.. totally bullcrap arguments. Bullcrap
tsquare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 02:13 PM   #69097 (permalink)
Wants to win the Lottery
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Ungrooved runways are groovy.
Posts: 14,222
Default

I'm going to quote above your post due to using the iPhone.

First I agree!

Second the 717 is great for a lot of things and it's too bad Boeing suffocated it. That said the SWA insiders who don't want the 717 and said recently that SWA management in roadshows was saying the 717 would be released are now saying that it's staying. Whether that's because SWA wants the 717 or any deal to get rid it of it isn't worth it or Delta doesn't like the numbers for now we won't know. But SWA management mentioned the 717 sim will be headed to Dallas.

After a hellacious weekend of nonreving I think I see the beauty of the 88 for sure now. We need seats. 319s, 73-7s and 9s just don't cut it. They have their place but what is needed is cheap airplanes with lots of seats IMHO to absorb irops.

I'm not convinced fuel efficiency is that big of a deal if 150 seater can be had cheap, in the case of allegiant for $4-$5M for line ready birds, versus a horribly expensive smaller first year model high efficiency jet. Want fuel efficiency then let's talk props.

I say buy used Airbuses and 80s until your house is in order.

Maybe I'm jaded about new planes but I can tell you after looking through the sales numbers of a large multi store car dealership I can say the money wasn't in new cars but the $10,000 range used cars. The ones you can buy for $3k and sell for $9.9k versus the high price used or new cars where the margins were under $2.5k and you lived off maintenance and finance & interest income and manufacturer coupons. Dealers love the margins of their used lots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NuGuy View Post
Heyas FtB,

Replacement 100 seaters do NOT have to be expensive.

Take a DC-9...maybe with a new wing with better high altitude performance / more fuel. The airfame structure itself is PROVEN by 50 years experience.

Normal cabin and cargo capacity.

Simplify the systems a bit. The 717 would be a good model for this.

Where you can, have STONE SIMPLE systems with good dispatch redundancy. Anyone who's ever turned a wrench on a DC-9 or 737 should be able to fix it.

What you don't need is a MD-11 cockpit. Two IRUs, two comms, a simple FMS with BASIC RNAV capability (no need for RNP in the states). Think of something along the lines of a F-100.

No fly by wire. No hydraulic powered flight controls. No complicated engines. Roll it down hill, let the clutch out, and off you go. You should be able to practically pull start the engines.


Nu

Last edited by forgot to bid; 06-26-2011 at 02:32 PM.
forgot to bid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 02:21 PM   #69098 (permalink)
Wants to win the Lottery
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Ungrooved runways are groovy.
Posts: 14,222
Default

Btw, when it comes to aircraft orders one thing I'll never forget was post 9/11 was that CAL, lessee of lots and lots of new shinny jets, was all of a sudden no different than a suddenly underemployed person who had maxed out their credit cards, home mortgage and car leases.

I remember CAL people lamenting as Gordon Bethune ran around proclaiming CAL would fire/furlough 10,000 people immediately that while the NWA DC9s were old at least they were paid for.

Btw, why aren't we talking E190s again? Seems like with Airbus ramping up this neo program and the cseries gaining some steam that maybe it's time to buy used or cheap 190s.
forgot to bid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 03:53 PM   #69099 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Plug to be, LAX here i come again...
Posts: 1,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NuGuy View Post
Heyas FtB,

Replacement 100 seaters do NOT have to be expensive.

Take a DC-9...maybe with a new wing with better high altitude performance / more fuel. The airfame structure itself is PROVEN by 50 years experience.

Normal cabin and cargo capacity.

Simplify the systems a bit. The 717 would be a good model for this.

Where you can, have STONE SIMPLE systems with good dispatch redundancy. Anyone who's ever turned a wrench on a DC-9 or 737 should be able to fix it.

What you don't need is a MD-11 cockpit. Two IRUs, two comms, a simple FMS with BASIC RNAV capability (no need for RNP in the states). Think of something along the lines of a F-100.

No fly by wire. No hydraulic powered flight controls. No complicated engines. Roll it down hill, let the clutch out, and off you go. You should be able to practically pull start the engines.


Nu
Heyas Nu,

If you can stomach "Made in China" what you describe exists.

Built on the tooling ships 965 and 964 were built on, here's everything you wanted plus glass.

RNP is part of NexGen ATC and you won't be able to fly an airliner without RNP in just a few years, thus the cockpit upgrades in the pipe for the Maddogs.

And now I present

DC-9-30 with Russian wing RJ-motors and a new front window
Avic ARJ21









Personally, I'd prefer the US-made 717....

Cheers
George
georgetg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 04:17 PM   #69100 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
fisherpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 222
Default

Heres a question I've always wondered about. Forgive my knowledge on this as most of my experience has been part 91 with a little 121 mixed in. I've always wondered do the fuel savings on newer, more fuel efficient aircraft offset the cost of running less fuel efficient aircraft that are paid for. I'm assuming that over time that it would.

Just made me wonder with the talks on here about aircraft orders

Thx
fisherpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply

Tags
r:15, s:0
 



« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html
Posted By For Type Date
Best and worst hubs? - Page 7 - FlyerTalk Forums This thread Refback 09-05-2009 06:11 AM
New MD-90's For DELTA, And From Where? — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net This thread Refback 05-21-2009 09:40 PM
Airliners.net forum: New MD-90's For DELTA, And From Where? This thread Refback 05-21-2009 08:19 PM
Delta Fleet Expansion? Reduction? Replacements? — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net This thread Refback 05-11-2009 11:42 AM
Delta Fleet Expansion? Reduction? Replacements? — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net This thread Refback 04-28-2009 04:50 AM
Delta Fleet Expansion? Reduction? Replacements? — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net This thread Refback 04-12-2009 09:50 PM
Delta Fleet Expansion? Reduction? Replacements? — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net This thread Refback 02-22-2009 09:33 AM
Airliners.net forum: Delta Fleet Expansion? Reduction? Replacements? This thread Refback 02-22-2009 08:12 AM
Delta Fleet Expansion? Reduction? Replacements? — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net This thread Refback 02-21-2009 06:21 AM
Airline Pilot Central Forums | Site profile | BoardReader This thread Refback 02-17-2009 06:23 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Delta deal could become model for scope Bill Lumberg Major 71 06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Delta TA Overview pksocal UAL/CAL Merger 25 05-23-2012 02:29 PM
Re: RAH Quagmire Major 253 04-16-2011 06:19 AM
Pinnacle Contract Terminated by Delta in ATL mike51135 Regional 139 06-12-2008 06:09 PM
DELTA to trump AMR? JiffyLube Major 12 03-07-2008 04:27 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 AM.


vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 Internet Brands, Inc.