Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2012, 08:14 PM
  #91321  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Default

Originally Posted by Gearjerk View Post
Bill,

I respect your opinion, and to be fair, can only say, "we will see". It is my opinion, that their are more "chest thumping keyboard rangers" than there are people willing to take action if D-ALPA produces something inadequate.

Just my .02

GJ

Reminds me of the show where the beaten wife won't leave her husband, even when there's plenty of help outside the house. But she can't bring herself to leave him. Some people get used to the abuse, I suppose. Me? uh uh...I'm out.
Jesse is offline  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:25 PM
  #91322  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by bigbusdriver View Post
Got it. Wearing your uniform at a BBQ and marching around managements office in support of your team in the merger over the other team is okay, but DALPA's "constructive engagement" with management isn't? To put it in simpler terms if DALPA had gone independent before the merger and was working like SWAPA or APA we'd be looking at stapling the NWA guys like AA did to TWA right? Screw the other guy! Its about me, especially if my management is looking out for me. That's a great message. I assume you'll be at the management BBQ with Richard and Ed for the next merger of 'equals' then? The DPA doesn't want a union period. They want to get rid of agency shop and stop paying dues. It's that simple.
Easy there, put down the pipe. I was saying it would be great if we had a union that could get us top pay and bennies plus be friendly with management that would "have our backs" on anything that would come our way. Wouldn't that be wonderful? Top pay and friendly management. We probably wouldn't even need a union if that were always true. Unfortunately, I don't see that happening, but SWAPA has had that the last decade, primarily because they don't also have to worry about RJs, and they mean what they say and don't fold like a deck of cards when it comes to things management wants. Why again did LM get rid of SILs that were worth 55 hours per month for NOT flying to the current ZERO hours of pay for an SIL? Makes NO sense. Thanks LM, enjoy your life long pension.....
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:30 PM
  #91323  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit View Post
What were you looking at for the first 20+ years of SWA's existence???? They never led at anything until the others' went backwards.
I'm looking at something more recent, like the last decade. 20 years ago they also had very cute FAs, but those around back then are still around today, and aren't as cute. Do you always look back 20 years at every analysis? The last 10 years have been good for SWAPA.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 03-02-2012, 09:54 PM
  #91324  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit View Post
What were you looking at for the first 20+ years of SWA's existence???? They never led at anything until the others' went backwards.

Yo, Shiz!

Hope you are not in ATL tonight and hope everyone else in the SE has survived intact.

I'll get to the point.

Southwest gets paid more than us. Lots more!

Their medical kicks @ss. Their scope is pretty good to I hear.

We are no longer in the enviable position we were with C2K. Lots of guys out on the line don't want to believe this and try and rationalize these facts away. One of the first steps in fixing this is recognizing the issue and embracing. When we all can get behind this truth, we can focus our energy and win.

We can't if guys keep falling for this:

Belief Disconfirmation Paradigm
  • Belief disconfirmation paradigm occurs when a person is presented with information which conflicts with his beliefs. If unable to change his beliefs the conflict experienced could result in a rejection of the conflicting information or the denial of the information. A person unable to resolve the conflict will seek others sharing a similar belief to restore agreement of thoughts. An example of belief disconfirmation paradigm is cult members who experience the failure of a prophecy to occur. The cult members will typically seek an explanation among the group and reach a conclusion that provides an answer that creates harmony.



Last edited by TheManager; 03-02-2012 at 10:20 PM.
TheManager is offline  
Old 03-02-2012, 10:03 PM
  #91325  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Now, If you thought the last one was good, wait until you check this next one out.

It fits us pilots to a "T."

Remeber in our latest QCQ CD, the one where we don't get paid 1 for 1 for completing it? There was a section describing how "compliant " pilots are.

I know present:


Induced-Compliance Paradigm

  • The induced-compliance paradigm is when a person internalizes an attitude that they were encouraged to express because they had no other justification. In a study conducted in 1959 by Festinger and Carlsmith's, participants were requested to spend an hour on a boring and tedious task that created a strong, negative feeling. When participants completed the task they were asked to talk to others and convince them that the tasks were interesting. One group of participants was paid $1 for the task. Another group was paid $20 to perform the same. A control group was asked to do nothing. When rating the boring tasks after completion of the experiment, those paid $1 rated the tasks more positively than those in the other two groups. The theory that Festinger and Carlsmith's provided was that due to guilt and an inability to justify their actions, the lower-paid participants internalized their attitude.

  • Those paid $20 had an external justification: money.



HHHmmmmm. Sound vaguely familiar?
TheManager is offline  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:21 AM
  #91326  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL717A
Posts: 890
Default

What's the deal with the uniform survey? Should this really be an issue now?

I hope we don't waste one second of negotiations or one cent of possible restoration attempting to modify the uniform. Questions like, "should we replace the coat with a windbreaker?", "should we be allowed to leave the coat unbuttoned?" , "would you like a leather jacket?". Of course there's something about the hat.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't believe this is what bothers us. For the right price, I'll wear a clown suit.

Sorry if this has been discussed earlier - didn't have time to skim the last 30 pages of dalpa/dpa arguments.
Jughead is offline  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:35 AM
  #91327  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,262
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
Easy there, put down the pipe. I was saying it would be great if we had a union that could get us top pay and bennies plus be friendly with management that would "have our backs" on anything that would come our way. Wouldn't that be wonderful? Top pay and friendly management. We probably wouldn't even need a union if that were always true. Unfortunately, I don't see that happening, but SWAPA has had that the last decade, primarily because they don't also have to worry about RJs, and they mean what they say and don't fold like a deck of cards when it comes to things management wants. Why again did LM get rid of SILs that were worth 55 hours per month for NOT flying to the current ZERO hours of pay for an SIL? Makes NO sense. Thanks LM, enjoy your life long pension.....
I would love to know how some of this stuff comes up. LM did not get rid of SIL's. In fact SIL's are available today if the company were to offer them. DALPA came up with the SIL concept. The put it to the company and the company decided to incorporate it into a side letter. After using SIL's for over a year the company audited the program and found that they were not saving any money and in fact it was slightly cost positive. They stopped offering SIL's. The only time they saved money was when a category was grossly overmanned. We don't have any categories in that situation now. SIL's were never contractually mandated on the company. They were a option the company could use when the felt it might save them money. It did not and they quit using them.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:40 AM
  #91328  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead View Post
What's the deal with the uniform survey? Should this really be an issue now?

I hope we don't waste one second of negotiations or one cent of possible restoration attempting to modify the uniform. Questions like, "should we replace the coat with a windbreaker?", "should we be allowed to leave the coat unbuttoned?" , "would you like a leather jacket?". Of course there's something about the hat.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't believe this is what bothers us. For the right price, I'll wear a clown suit.

Sorry if this has been discussed earlier - didn't have time to skim the last 30 pages of dalpa/dpa arguments.
+1 !!!

If this is the case, I could care less about modifying the current uniform policy. Just seems like an incredible waste of resources and time.
I'd wear assless chaps and a Mexican sombrero to work if it meant an industry leading contract.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 03-03-2012, 04:44 AM
  #91329  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead View Post
What's the deal with the uniform survey? Should this really be an issue now?

I hope we don't waste one second of negotiations or one cent of possible restoration attempting to modify the uniform. Questions like, "should we replace the coat with a windbreaker?", "should we be allowed to leave the coat unbuttoned?" , "would you like a leather jacket?". Of course there's something about the hat.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't believe this is what bothers us. For the right price, I'll wear a clown suit.

Sorry if this has been discussed earlier - didn't have time to skim the last 30 pages of dalpa/dpa arguments.
I thought exactly the same thing Jug. Now? We're going to waste valuable oxygen talking about hats and jackets now? No, oh hell no. I'll show up with only my lucky gold lamay thong if we can achieve a regaining of benefits, scope and QOL.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 03-03-2012, 05:05 AM
  #91330  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

If any of you homos touch my stuff I'll ...

Enough of the a$$less chaps and thongs.

The uniform survey is a sleight of hand tactic used by magicians...if you cannot see it for what it is. Do not look at the uniform survey, instead, watch what DALPA is doing with their other hand.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices