Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2009, 09:00 PM   #111 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Listing the names of companies doesn't make you sound authoritative. It just makes you sound desperate to change the subject.
Na...... it just proves that, unlike you, all those truly world class corporations are pro outsourcing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post

You said Boeing's problem with the 787 had nothing to do with outsourcing. You listed numerous other reasons, but not your teacher's pet...outsourcing. Many others responded to you stating that outsourcing was THE MAJOR problem with the 787. With Boeing's actions, they understand that outsourcing is the problem. The financial press agrees. You don't. That's the issue.
The bottom line is, any and all issues with the B787 are BOEING issues!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Talk to your college professor and ask him if it's OK for you to change your mind on this subject.Carl
No need. I'm still saying outsourcing isn't the problem. "If" there are outsourcing issues, it's down to Boeing's lack of efficient Kanban systems.

Outsourcing does have its challenges. But, do you know any major manufacturing corporations that don't outsource?

Do you foresee Boeing's 15,000+ approved vendor list shrinking in future with more production returning to Seattle? It will NEVER happen. Their vendor list will continue to increase as will their outsourcing.


Seriously dude, what kinda car do you drive?





Al
__________________
The BOD don't fool me!
alvrb211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 10:31 PM   #112 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Probably in a country that doesn't have TP :(
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvrb211 View Post

Do you foresee Boeing's 15,000+ approved vendor list shrinking in future with more production returning to Seattle? It will NEVER happen. Their vendor list will continue to increase as will their outsourcing.
Vendor is a part supplier. Like a rivet or a panel or a bolt or a window, etc, etc, etc.....

The OUTSOURCING we are talking about here is more functions such as installing parts from vendors. This means that the vendor is getting the parts and trying to assemble them and then send a larger sub-assembly to Boeing. It isn't working. See the difference? No, of course you don't.

This happens in many industries. This is when the supplier says "Yes, we can do that" and signs a contract and then guess what "No they can't do that". This happens often. Auto industry pulls work away from suppliers because they fail to get the "outsourced" job done. The Aircraft industry and others have the same problem.

But at the end of the day, this thread is getting stale. After the 787 fly's you will say, "See, outsourcing worked!!!!" while the rest of the world will be saying "Boeing would have had the thing up 2 years ago but for the outsourcing......."
FastDEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 09:43 AM   #113 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastDEW View Post
Vendor is a part supplier. Like a rivet or a panel or a bolt or a window, etc, etc, etc.....
A vendor is NOT merely a part supplier!
Vendors provide a variety of goods and services!
Sure, some vendors do supply only parts. Others supply finished inventory. Vendors also provide additional services like financing. Think of Rolls Royce financing B787's for NorthWest while they were operating under Chapter 11. Rolls did this in return for an engine order.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastDEW View Post
The OUTSOURCING we are talking about here is more functions such as installing parts from vendors. This means that the vendor is getting the parts and trying to assemble them and then send a larger sub-assembly to Boeing. It isn't working. See the difference? No, of course you don't.
This happens in many industries. This is when the supplier says "Yes, we can do that" and signs a contract and then guess what "No they can't do that".
Part of the problem is Boeing's lack of quality control. Boeing DO NOT require their suppliers to have AS9100 certification. This means that their suppliers can avoid implementing Airline Quality Management System Certification (AQMS). In addition, Boeing does not have a sufficient Kanban system in place. Of course, this is to say nothing of Boeing's problems in-house in Seattle. I've said all along, this is Boeing's mess!

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastDEW View Post
This happens often. Auto industry pulls work away from suppliers because they fail to get the "outsourced" job done. The Aircraft industry and others have the same problem..
Don't even go there with the auto industry. Outsourcing is a huge success in the auto industry and will continue to increase. That's good for the US as nobody want's American cars and everyone's buying Toyota's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastDEW View Post
But at the end of the day, this thread is getting stale. After the 787 fly's you will say, "See, outsourcing worked!!!!" while the rest of the world will be saying "Boeing would have had the thing up 2 years ago but for the outsourcing......."
If they did, it would only be counterfactual reasoning!
You have to outsource to retain competitive advantage especially in an oligopolistic industry. The B787 will be a success once Boeing fix their operation.

You're right, the thread is dead. Don't take my word for all this though,
Dr. John G. Wensveen PhD, of The International Air Transportation Association (IATA), covers these subjects in detail in his publications.
Of course, you have to be open to learning from someone in the know!

Good day.
__________________
The BOD don't fool me!

Last edited by alvrb211 : 07-11-2009 at 11:22 AM.
alvrb211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 11:52 AM   #114 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 1,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvrb211 View Post
Do you foresee Boeing's 15,000+ approved vendor list shrinking in future with more production returning to Seattle?
I guarantee it. Boeing came very close to losing the company on this one. They will continue to increase the amount of critical work done in-house.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvrb211 View Post
Seriously dude, what kinda car do you drive?
Mostly a golf cart. But also a Jaguar XK-8.

Carl
__________________
I'm an airline pilot - so I got that goin for me....which is nice.
Carl Spackler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 11:54 AM   #115 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 1,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastDEW View Post
Vendor is a part supplier. Like a rivet or a panel or a bolt or a window, etc, etc, etc.....

The OUTSOURCING we are talking about here is more functions such as installing parts from vendors. This means that the vendor is getting the parts and trying to assemble them and then send a larger sub-assembly to Boeing. It isn't working. See the difference? No, of course you don't.

This happens in many industries. This is when the supplier says "Yes, we can do that" and signs a contract and then guess what "No they can't do that". This happens often. Auto industry pulls work away from suppliers because they fail to get the "outsourced" job done. The Aircraft industry and others have the same problem.

But at the end of the day, this thread is getting stale. After the 787 fly's you will say, "See, outsourcing worked!!!!" while the rest of the world will be saying "Boeing would have had the thing up 2 years ago but for the outsourcing......."
You are exactly correct.

You're also right that the thread is a bit stale. No minds will be changed here.

Carl
__________________
I'm an airline pilot - so I got that goin for me....which is nice.
Carl Spackler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 02:46 PM   #116 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Probably in a country that doesn't have TP :(
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post


Mostly a golf cart. But also a Jaguar XK-8.

Carl
NICE!!!!!!
FastDEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 03:41 PM   #117 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: A330 FO with a fake type rating
Posts: 337
Default

Harley Davidson. No Outsourced work.
Nosmo King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 08:26 PM   #118 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
I guarantee it. Boeing came very close to losing the company on this one. They will continue to increase the amount of critical work done in-house.



Mostly a golf cart. But also a Jaguar XK-8.

Carl

I've always liked the styling of Jaguars. Sharp looking cars!

They of course do a lot of outsourcing. I know they outsource the paintwork to Rolls Royce Motor Cars along with Aston Martin. They also did a lot of outsourcing to Ford. It's that darn outsourcing again.

Also, Jaguar are owned by an Indian firm. There's a thought huh?

Not to worry, when you need parts from Mumbai, just use Fedex!

What make is your golf cart? Did they ship it from India along with the car?

You had me going for a while Carl. Yet here you are, supporting outsourcing and globalization along with the masses!





AL
__________________
The BOD don't fool me!

Last edited by alvrb211 : 07-12-2009 at 06:57 AM.
alvrb211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 11:10 AM   #119 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 1,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvrb211 View Post


I've always liked the styling of Jaguars. Sharp looking cars!

They of course do a lot of outsourcing. I know they outsource the paintwork to Rolls Royce Motor Cars along with Aston Martin. They also did a lot of outsourcing to Ford. It's that darn outsourcing again.

Also, Jaguar are owned by an Indian firm. There's a thought huh?

Not to worry, when you need parts from Mumbai, just use Fedex!

What make is your golf cart? Did they ship it from India along with the car?

You had me going for a while Carl. Yet here you are, supporting outsourcing and globalization along with the masses!

AL
I told you what I drive for a reason. I knew that your retort would be that I was supporting outsourcing. But here's what you really need to know: the XK-8 is a beautiful piece of junk. It breaks all the time. The poor quality is yet another example of ignorant management teams that think outsourcing is the cure to all problems.

Boeing will continue the process of bringing critical work back in house. Absolutely guaranteed. You and your college professor can continue to sing the praises of outsourcing - despite today's reality proving otherwise.

Carl
__________________
I'm an airline pilot - so I got that goin for me....which is nice.
Carl Spackler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 02:06 PM   #120 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
I told you what I drive for a reason. I knew that your retort would be that I was supporting outsourcing. But here's what you really need to know: the XK-8 is a beautiful piece of junk. It breaks all the time. The poor quality is yet another example of ignorant management teams that think outsourcing is the cure to all problems.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post

Boeing will continue the process of bringing critical work back in house. Absolutely guaranteed. You and your college professor can continue to sing the praises of outsourcing - despite today's reality proving otherwise.

Carl



lets see...........

Toyota= Major outsourcer worldwide = World's most efficient auto maker!
That's a function of defects per one hundred cars produced by the way!

Jaguar = relatively miniscule outsourcer=Troubled brand.


Good correlation between poor quality and outsourcing Carl. NOT!!!!!!!

Good luck finding a non outsourcing automaker to replace the XK-8

Sorry, I don't know any independent custom builders anywhere in the world since Aston Martin began outsourcing years ago.

Guess everyone sees a need to outsource. Except you!

I've been very happy with several BMW's over the years. They do a lot of outsourcing! I think it's fair to say BMW is a respected brand no?


AL
__________________
The BOD don't fool me!

Last edited by alvrb211 : 07-12-2009 at 02:20 PM.
alvrb211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
logging PIC question Time2Fly Corporate 33 09-03-2009 07:42 PM
Boeing 787 No. 1 vagabond Technical 3 05-10-2009 03:15 PM
Commuter Hell fatmike69 Regional 82 03-02-2009 06:02 AM
787 won't enter service before 2012 georgetg Major 0 12-11-2008 02:09 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7