Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2009, 05:51 PM   #31 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 1,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastDEW View Post
But the 380 is a turd and it is FUGLY to boot.
Man is THAT ever correct. I taxied past one the other day in Narita. It showed me why that airplane is never photographed directly from the side. It is one ugly airplane.

I told my F/O that if the 380 were a date, you'd be hoping that her daddy was a billionaire.

Carl
__________________
I'm an airline pilot - so I got that goin for me....which is nice.
Carl Spackler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 05:55 PM   #32 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 1,313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xtreme View Post
Airbus' future is however dependant on what they find out with the AF 447 crash. If they do have a serious design flaw with the vertical stab, this is going to be tough for airbus to recover from.
The loss of a vertical stabilizer alone does not make an aircraft crash. Jack Northrop's flying wing from the 1940's is proof that you don't need a vertical fin.

It was probably a chain of presently unknown events that led to the inflight break up of the aircraft.

Carl
__________________
I'm an airline pilot - so I got that goin for me....which is nice.
Carl Spackler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 09:05 PM   #33 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Probably in a country that doesn't have TP :(
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
The loss of a vertical stabilizer alone does not make an aircraft crash. Jack Northrop's flying wing from the 1940's is proof that you don't need a vertical fin.

It was probably a chain of presently unknown events that led to the inflight break up of the aircraft.

Carl
This is true, the B52 lost its tail in severe turb over CO years ago and flew home safely.

Having said that though - the 330 is a total fly by wire airplane. I "fly" the 320 which is much the same in controls. Basically you don't fly it, you monitor it and interact with it. So the loss of the vertical stab on one of those birds may be another story.

Last edited by FastDEW : 06-24-2009 at 09:15 PM.
FastDEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 09:07 PM   #34 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Probably in a country that doesn't have TP :(
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Man is THAT ever correct. I taxied past one the other day in Narita. It showed me why that airplane is never photographed directly from the side. It is one ugly airplane.

I told my F/O that if the 380 were a date, you'd be hoping that her daddy was a billionaire.

Carl
No kidding! The 747 is so beautiful, the 777 is terrific, even the 340 is nice. The 380 is just nasty looking and not in a good way.
FastDEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 09:08 PM   #35 (permalink)
Gets No Weekends Off
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post

I told my F/O that if the 380 were a date, you'd be hoping that her daddy was a billionaire.

Carl

The 380 is the one the other girls say has "beautiful eyes and great personality"
__________________
Oooh wee, T-Shane...
80ktsClamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 11:35 PM   #36 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
The loss of a vertical stabilizer alone does not make an aircraft crash. Jack Northrop's flying wing from the 1940's is proof that you don't need a vertical fin.

It was probably a chain of presently unknown events that led to the inflight break up of the aircraft.

Carl

AA 587 from JFK?
dba74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 07:10 AM   #37 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dba74 View Post
AA 587 from JFK?

There's no question that composites can be problematic. Does the B787 come with ultrasound equipment?

Al
__________________
The BOD don't fool me!
alvrb211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 07:35 AM   #38 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvrb211 View Post
There's no question that composites can be problematic. Does the B787 come with ultrasound equipment?

Al
Actually, it looks like it will.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flightblogger
PARIS -- With 787 first flight targeted for the end of this month, Boeing and GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies are looking ahead to the entry into service of the first majority composite airliner with Bondtracer, a tool enabling ramp and flightline crews to evaluate damage to composite structure.

GE partnered with Boeing to build on the US airframer's Ramp Damage Checker for inspecting composite structure in the event that it is struck by ground handling equipment, as often happens during the normal course of airline operations.

The Bondtracer is designed for use on the 787, but can also be used for any aircraft with composite structure and will accommodate the Airbus A350 XWB in the future.

Damage to carbon fibre is often difficult to determine because the surface often reflects no visible harm. However, beneath the skin of the aircraft sub-surface delamination of the fibre can be difficult to see with the naked eye and can undermine aircraft structural integrity if left unaddressed.

"Carbon fibre composites require different processes for evaluating impact and performing non-destructive inspection," says Thierry Laffont, Aerospace Segment Manager at GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies.

"Our goal with Bondtracer is to provide ramp crews with a simple device to quickly determine when more extensive inspection is required. The solution allows airlines to ensure safety while increasing efficiency and productivity," Laffont adds.

Boeing received US Federal Aviation Administration approval for the 787's maintenance plan in December 2008.

GE likens Bondracer to a common stud-finder, with a green light indicating consistent undamaged thickness and a red light indicated an unanticipated change in thickness. The tool is designed for ramp personnel with no non-destructive training or certification.

The 787 will enter service with Japan's All Nippon Airways in the first quarter of 2010.
Link
Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 07:44 AM   #39 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 516
Default

I didn't see that. Good post!

No wonder GE bought Smiths.

Al
__________________
The BOD don't fool me!
alvrb211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 09:50 AM   #40 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 246
Default

Problem is, they expect rampers to voluntarily admit hitting a/c
dba74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
logging PIC question Time2Fly Corporate 33 09-03-2009 07:42 PM
Boeing 787 No. 1 vagabond Technical 3 05-10-2009 03:15 PM
Commuter Hell fatmike69 Regional 82 03-02-2009 06:02 AM
787 won't enter service before 2012 georgetg Major 0 12-11-2008 02:09 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7