Pilots helping pilots

View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2009, 09:49 AM   #11 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 4th Amendment
Posts: 2,277
Default

2 Co and TPRO,

This is a bankruptcy proceeding, the judge rules. I posted on an earlier thread that SWA could bid $1 Billion for F9 and if the judge doesn't feel the deal is solid (as it is not with an escape clause dependant on an SLI agreement), he could accept a much lower offer from anyone else. He is the King in that courtroom and cash is not necessarily so.

We shall see, but as I pointed out before, I think that SWAPA SLI clause is likely to kill the deal.

New K Now
__________________
Choice is an illusion, between those with power, and those without.
newKnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 09:56 AM   #12 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 4th Amendment
Posts: 2,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TPROP4ever View Post
No actually its about SWA dropping their bid if FAPA doesnt accept a staple. SW has a good corporate culture and is not about to screw that up over another East/West scenario, or years of legal battles, I get the feeling for SWA their attitude is its a take it or leave it scenario...

How do you know SWA's bid is dependant on a staple? The pilots are the ones who are negotiating, right? What if the pilots come up with something else?
__________________
Choice is an illusion, between those with power, and those without.
newKnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 10:02 AM   #13 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: B757/767
Posts: 546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
How do you know SWA's bid is dependant on a staple? The pilots are the ones who are negotiating, right? What if the pilots come up with something else?
And I quote:

We felt that, considering the time constraints, the only way to adequately protect our entire pilot group was to place the FAPA pilots below the SWAPA pilots on our new Master Seniority List.

Head over to the SWAPA Update Thread (pg#2-bottom) and you can get the full low-down.
SoCalGuy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 10:13 AM   #14 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalGuy View Post
And I quote:

We felt that, considering the time constraints, the only way to adequately protect our entire pilot group was to place the FAPA pilots below the SWAPA pilots on our new Master Seniority List.

Head over to the SWAPA Update Thread (pg#2-bottom) and you can get the full low-down.

Yeah that, what he said, I got my info from the same thread, It appeared to be direct from SWAPA.....
__________________
Turbine Maule on floats..now thats a "Wet" Dream...
TPROP4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 10:20 AM   #15 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 4th Amendment
Posts: 2,277
Default

No. There is a difference between SWA's bid and what SWA pilots union wants. My only point is that if the union reverses it's position on the staple, and let's say agrees to binding arbitration, then SWA will go ahead with the deal.

SWA's bid is not based on F9 agreeing to a staple, it's really dependant on the two sides coming to an agreement.
__________________
Choice is an illusion, between those with power, and those without.

Last edited by newKnow : 08-13-2009 at 10:36 AM.
newKnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 10:23 AM   #16 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
No. There is a difference between SWA's bid and what SWA pilots uniuon wants. My only point is that if the union reverses it's position on the staple, and let's say agrees to binding arbitration, then SWA will go ahead with the deal.

SWA's bid is not based on F9 agreeing to a staple, it's really dependant on the two sides coming to an agreement.
Actually you are correct, I'm sorry I wasnt clear in my post. My belief though is that if F9 doesnt agree to a staple that SWAPA will refuse an agreement thus leading to SWA retracting the bid, I could be wrong, Im trying to follow this also to see the outcome, and it seems things are moving pretty fast
I guess the point here is SWAPA basically holds the cards, because they dont want or need DRAMA just to buy a BK carrier. I really dont see any leverage existing for FAPA in this, come on most of us agree a staple to SWA is better than a drawn out arbitration with RAH..but if FAPA and the F9 pilots feel better about their odds with RAH then they need to fight to go that route, my opinion doesnt matter, its up to them and their negotiators to decide the line in the sand
__________________
Turbine Maule on floats..now thats a "Wet" Dream...
TPROP4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 10:29 AM   #17 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 16
Default

The Judge does NOT decide. Frontier's CEO picks the BEST plan, not who bids the most.
Southerndog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 10:30 AM   #18 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: B757/767
Posts: 546
Default

[quote=newKnow;661277]No. There is a difference between SWA's bid and what SWA pilots uniuon wants. My only point is that if the union reverses it's position on the staple, and let's say agrees to binding arbitration, then SWA will go ahead with the deal.

SWA's bid is not based on F9 agreeing to a staple, it's really dependant on the two sides coming to an agreement.[/quote]

I see what your saying....but reading the info I cited on the other thread (AND a$$uming that post is factual/real/legit), at this present time it seems like SWAPA's camp is leaving very little other options other than the quote mentioned above.

In the end, we can all stand outside the conference room door and speculate on 'what's going to happen in the end'.....when it's all said and done, what walks out the door, is what walks out the door.

Good point tho NewK...
SoCalGuy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 10:38 AM   #19 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
2 Co and TPRO,

This is a bankruptcy proceeding, the judge rules. I posted on an earlier thread that SWA could bid $1 Billion for F9 and if the judge doesn't feel the deal is solid (as it is not with an escape clause dependant on an SLI agreement), he could accept a much lower offer from anyone else. He is the King in that courtroom and cash is not necessarily so.

We shall see, but as I pointed out before, I think that SWAPA SLI clause is likely to kill the deal.

New K Now
You really don't have a clue what you are talking about.
Southerndog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 10:43 AM   #20 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 4th Amendment
Posts: 2,277
Default

[quote=SoCalGuy;661290]
Quote:
Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
No. There is a difference between SWA's bid and what SWA pilots uniuon wants. My only point is that if the union reverses it's position on the staple, and let's say agrees to binding arbitration, then SWA will go ahead with the deal.

SWA's bid is not based on F9 agreeing to a staple, it's really dependant on the two sides coming to an agreement.[/quote]

I see what your saying....but reading the info I cited on the other thread (AND a$$uming that post is factual/real/legit), at this present time it seems like SWAPA's camp is leaving very little other options other than the quote mentioned above.

In the end, we can all stand outside the conference room door and speculate on 'what's going to happen in the end'.....when it's all said and done, what walks out the door, is what walks out the door.

Good point tho NewK...

I know. I know. It's going to be ugly. I just can't believe that SWA (the company) couldn't see this coming. I just went thru a merger and SLI and it took nearly a year and only ended when we had 3 arbitrators decide.

I saw this coming instantly when I found out that a SLI had to be agreed to before the transaction. I'll have to dig up my post from a few weeks ago. Maybe I can rent my crystal ball out the next time.

New K Now
__________________
Choice is an illusion, between those with power, and those without.
newKnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Republic/Chautauqua New Deal With US Airways for E-170 and E-190 Frisky Pilot Regional 15 10-01-2009 05:27 PM
DHL-Will a deal be reached with UPS? FlightPhoenix Cargo 1 01-21-2009 11:00 AM
DHL/UPS DEAL Dead? FlightPhoenix Cargo 10 01-05-2009 10:36 PM
Washington rejects Ohio bid to halt DHL-UPS deal birdstrike Cargo 3 08-28-2008 04:43 AM
UPS makes informal $15 billion bid for TNT TipsyMcStagger Cargo 56 08-13-2008 02:42 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7