Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-08-2009, 08:01 AM   #11 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by B757200ER View Post
The US, ex-PI 767-200s are not full GW 200ERs like CO or El Al have (395.0), but 351.0 max-tow airplanes. Having flown them at 2 major airlines, I can assure you they only have a 9-9.5 hour range unrestricted. ATH-PHL must be 10 hours or more WB. Very difficult to do nonstop in a -200ER. And, the -300ER has a 11.5-12 hr range. We flew it nonstop from west coast-Europe and JFK-middle east/north Africa nonstop, both ways.
The flight home from Athens to Philly is near 11 hours. They seem to be making it just fine. I was unaware there are two gross weight versions of the ER. All 3 Versions of the ER have the same fuel tankage. That is why the 200 has the longest range. It is the lightest and the 400 has the shortest range. It is the heaviest. The 300 falls in the middle. Delta has regularly used the 300 ER on flights over 12 hours. We usually can make it with full seats even on those flights. Max gross is 407.0 for most 300's. A 200 with a max gross of 395.0 is not going to have any trouble filling all the seats and going further then the 300.

Boeing lists only the 200 at 395.0 as having been built. You can order a lighter weight version for less cost and to limit landing and take off fees however there are normally no structural differences. If you want the higher gross weight you simply call Boeing and send them a check. Delta did this to its fleet of 300ER's. They ordered them as 407,000 aircraft. When they started flying them over 12 hours they called Boeing and bumped the weights to 412,000 on some of the airframes. Paperwork change only. Boeing lists the 200ER as having 600 miles more range then the 300ER.

Last edited by sailingfun : 09-08-2009 at 08:12 AM.
sailingfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 05:15 PM   #12 (permalink)
A moment please...
 
JetPiedmont's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Just passin' thru
Posts: 669
Default

Guess we beat that horse.
__________________
If they can't see it coming, they sure won't know what to do when it gets here.
JetPiedmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 07:30 PM   #13 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
olympic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 4 Engines are better than 2
Posts: 315
Default

Still in Athens btw ...
olympic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 07:45 PM   #14 (permalink)
A moment please...
 
JetPiedmont's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Just passin' thru
Posts: 669
Default

Guess they broke it good.
__________________
If they can't see it coming, they sure won't know what to do when it gets here.
JetPiedmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 08:10 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
B757200ER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: B-757 Captain
Posts: 1,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Max gross is 407.0 for most 300's. A 200 with a max gross of 395.0 is not going to have any trouble filling all the seats and going further then the 300.

Boeing lists only the 200 at 395.0 as having been built. You can order a lighter weight version for less cost and to limit landing and take off fees however there are normally no structural differences.Boeing lists the 200ER as having 600 miles more range then the 300ER.
Yes, I agree the newest full-up HGW -200ER has 395,000 MTOW and the furthest range. But, the USairways (ex-Piedmont) -200ERs are not full GW -200ERs, but 351,000 MTOW. They don't carry the same fuel as a 395.0 aircraft, and their range is much shorter. I flew -200ERs with 337.0, 351.0 and 370.0 weights. The US jets have the smaller GW, and were delivered in
'87-'90. The Boeing specs you refer to are for the latest, newest -200ER, which is a 395.0 airplane, like CAL has, which is the only one available for production. In the 1980's and early 90's, they only built the smaller GW airplanes.

So, back to the thread, a 351.0 767 can't make 11 hours WB from ATH to PHL.
B757200ER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 11:23 PM   #16 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
olympic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 4 Engines are better than 2
Posts: 315
Default

Maybe they just sent the wrong 767 by accident and now they can't make it back
olympic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 05:51 AM   #17 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by B757200ER View Post
Yes, I agree the newest full-up HGW -200ER has 395,000 MTOW and the furthest range. But, the USairways (ex-Piedmont) -200ERs are not full GW -200ERs, but 351,000 MTOW. They don't carry the same fuel as a 395.0 aircraft, and their range is much shorter. I flew -200ERs with 337.0, 351.0 and 370.0 weights. The US jets have the smaller GW, and were delivered in
'87-'90. The Boeing specs you refer to are for the latest, newest -200ER, which is a 395.0 airplane, like CAL has, which is the only one available for production. In the 1980's and early 90's, they only built the smaller GW airplanes.

So, back to the thread, a 351.0 767 can't make 11 hours WB from ATH to PHL.
I fly the ATH route often. They fly it right along side of us. I have never heard them stop for gas once so they must have a different aircraft then you believe or they really know how to save gas!
sailingfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 08:07 AM   #18 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
B757200ER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: B-757 Captain
Posts: 1,093
Default

Well, if it is usually an A330, especially a A330-200, no problem.
B757200ER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 09:39 AM   #19 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,162
Default

Its always a 767-200. The listed range specs between the 767-200 and the A330-200 are within 300 miles of each other. They are very close. The 300ER with winglets has near the same range as the 767-200.
sailingfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 07:58 PM   #20 (permalink)
Furlooiughed pylotte
 
seattlepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 133
Default

A friend of mine was on that flight. According to her they waited in the plane for about 4 hours after push back. Something went wrong and they had to wait for mx personnel. After 6 hours delay they deplaned the pax and rebooked them on the same flight next day.. My friend managed to be put on BA flight to IAD.
seattlepilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Republic/Chautauqua New Deal With US Airways for E-170 and E-190 Frisky Pilot Regional 15 10-01-2009 06:27 PM
Piedmont and AWAC just got screwed!!!!!! whoareyou310 Regional 59 08-21-2009 06:59 AM
Republic Airlines History Splanky Regional 11 09-17-2008 03:52 PM
US Airways poised for future merger Sir James Major 0 03-15-2005 09:35 PM
Piecing together the US Airways Puzzle RockBottom Major 0 03-07-2005 12:04 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7