Bad assumption. If it's not spelled out in the law, then that will be up to the airline to decide.
Hopefully most will pony up since it should just be a PC + extra maneuvers + 8710.
True, but the precedence of the Radio Telephone permit, a Passport etc are there. When those became required the companies that I know of footed the bill.
(A) PROSPECTIVE FLIGHT CREWMEMBERS- Rules issued under paragraph (1) shall ensure that prospective flight crewmembers undergo comprehensive pre-employment screening, including an assessment of the skills, aptitudes, airmanship, and suitability of each applicant for a position as a flight crewmember in terms of functioning effectively in the air carrier’s operational environment.
(B) ALL FLIGHT CREWMEMBERS- Rules issued under paragraph (1) shall ensure that, after the date that is 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, all flight crewmembers--
(i) have obtained an airline transport pilot license under part 61 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; and
(ii) have appropriate multi-engine aircraft flight experience, as determined by the Administrator.
My point was that if they do not grandfather in current non-atp pilots the airlines will have to foot the bill. New applicants will have to meet the ATP mins and hold the certificate.
This bill will be a boon for military flying, which is a good thing for the nation. Get more time and better training at government expense, get your ATP on your own time, and show up ready to go with an airline. That "used" to be the way it was done before the regionals became a player and grew exponentially in the early 2000s.
This bill will be a boon for military flying, which is a good thing for the nation. Get more time and better training at government expense, get your ATP on your own time, and show up ready to go with an airline. That "used" to be the way it was done before the regionals became a player and grew exponentially in the early 2000s.
PS. The pay is better but be prepared for some "interesting" lay overs.