Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Northwest jet overshoots Minneapolis airport >

Northwest jet overshoots Minneapolis airport

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Northwest jet overshoots Minneapolis airport

Old 10-22-2009, 01:39 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,031
Default

Originally Posted by Spacemann Splif View Post
That stuff isn't cheap either.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 01:41 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,031
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
How about a good book? It is a way to stay awake in cruise.

Better than sitting there and hitting your head on the glareshield.

I know most manuals say "no reading of non-company material" in the cockpit and I usually don't (most my legs are under 2 hours) , but something as simple as reading keeps your mind engaged and alert, especially on a long flight. I understand why the rule is there, for liability reasons. I doubt it will ever change, but I think a rule such as "Reading is allowed from 20 minutes after TOC to 20 minute before TOD" wouldn't compromise safety and keep crewmembers alert.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 01:46 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hoser's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Recliner 105A
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by The Dominican View Post
Kind of curious about the dispatchers flight tracking procedures and did the cabin attendants didn't find it odd that by their estimated time of arrival they were still at cruise??.
Maybe they all were asleep?

When I was a controller in the AF at Eglin, we had a controller on the midnight shift fall asleep at the scope and never took a overflight handoff from PNA approach. That boy paid the price for that. It happens (falling asleep) everywhere unfortunately.

Hoser
Roll Tide!
Hoser is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 01:51 PM
  #24  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

This stuff is all happening while management pushes for their precious SOC.
Hurry up. Faster. Quicker. Shortcut this. Finesse that. Time is money.
Listen to today's earnings call. SOC is all about revenue and "synergies".
Not a word about safety.

Maybe we should slow down just a bit.

Let's hope the FAA has not lost sight of the real purpose behind granting an airline operating certificate.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 01:54 PM
  #25  
Custom User Title
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,269
Default

Standing by for regional vs. mainline battle...
AZFlyer is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:14 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jabwmu's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon View Post
That stuff isn't cheap either.
I've never had one but know people that do. They say it works great. I believe it's less than $3 a bottle. How much is Starbucks?

Added: It's also a Michigan product
jabwmu is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:25 PM
  #27  
*********
 
paxhauler85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
I'm going to be riding on this SAN-MSP flight in a few weeks. What eventually happened to the crew of the Mesa CRJ that fell asleep in Hawaii? We've definitely had people get dead out here on the left coast when they fell asleep and went out over the ocean.... Waking up when the motors ran out of gas.

Sounds like the crew of the ATL taxiway landing is covering for their buddy who was either in the jumpseat (unlikely) and watched/let it happen, or was supposed to be there, and now had a convenient reason why he wasn't.
The Mesa guys were fired rather quickly, and without ceremony. The CA on that flight was a piece of trash anyway, so he did us a favor.

Please elaborate on the bolded part of your post above. The way I read it, you're saying they invented the medical emergency after they realized 6 eyes let a 767 land on a taxiway. 2 of those eyes belonging to a Check Airman.
paxhauler85 is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:29 PM
  #28  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Here's an interview with a passenger. He reports the pilots had been making announcements. Also says the "dark suits" removed a "case" from the cockpit on landing.What might that have been?
bcollinsmn is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:35 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: The Beginnings
Posts: 1,317
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer View Post
Just saw this on the WSJ. This blurb below is from the Minneapolis paper. The WSJ suggests the crew might of fallen alsleep. Here's the flightaware data too:


Northwest jet overshoots Minneapolis airport

Associated Press
Last update: October 22, 2009 - 2:46 PM

MINNEAPOLIS - Federal officials say a Northwest Airlines jet overflew the Minneapolis airport by 150 miles before crew members discovered their mistake. The plane landed safely Wednesday evening, and none of the 147 passengers and crew were injured. The National Transportation Safety Board says the Airbus A320 was flying from San Diego to Minneapolis and lost radio contact with controllers before 7 p.m. The NTSB says the jet flew about 150 miles past the Minneapolis airport before communications were re-established at 8:14 p.m. The Federal Aviation Administration says the crew told authorities they became distracted during a heated discussion over airline policy and lost track of where they were.
Ouch. Words fail. Retraining in the sim to not discuss airline policy, perhaps?

This one is pretty hard to defend on any level. If, in fact, this is actually what happened. I love the WSJ, but when it comes to aviation stories, I don't really believe anything I read in the newspapers.
deltabound is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:35 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoonShot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,044
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential View Post
This stuff is all happening while management pushes for their precious SOC.
Hurry up. Faster. Quicker. Shortcut this. Finesse that. Time is money.
Listen to today's earnings call. SOC is all about revenue and "synergies".
Not a word about safety.

Maybe we should slow down just a bit.

Let's hope the FAA has not lost sight of the real purpose behind granting an airline operating certificate.
I'm never one to rush to the defense of management, but I doubt that either of these two events had anything to do with management wanting to get SOC as fast as possible. FWIW, I have met RA twice in person. Once at our new hire dinner and once as a jumpseater, and both times he was emphatic about safety being our top prority.
MoonShot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WeaselBoy
Major
94
07-29-2009 09:24 PM
forgot to bid
Major
485
04-03-2009 07:34 PM
Pantera
Hangar Talk
12
02-22-2009 03:58 AM
Sir James
Major
2
03-17-2005 04:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
02-21-2005 10:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices