Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-25-2009, 05:01 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop View Post
I've seen the pay for the last minute checked bag at gate. Especially not pretty if the bag would fit, but there is no more space.
Alright, let's name names on this one. RyanAir (the usual suspect) wants "£35/€35" for any carry-on bag (you're only allowed one) that is too big (£35 is worth €38, which is $57, so pay in € if you can, and save about $5), but they also restrict bags to "10kg" with maximum dimensions of 55cm x 40cm x 20cm. I just can't see a 737 filling the overheads with only 1 bag per passenger, when each bag weighs less than 22 lbs and is smaller than the standard 'roll aboard' that all US crew know so well.

I've NEVER seen a plane where the bins are full. I've seen plenty where the FAs called 'bins full', and they were, though with crew bags, jackets, and small personal items that could go under seats.

Who, other than RyanAir, would charge for a carry-on that won't fit b/c the bins are full (and do the bins really fill on RyanAir, considering the limits RyanAir puts on carry-on baggage already)?
Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 06:27 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 467
Default

Northwest (prior to the merger), ANC and they were charging at the gate for carry ons that wouldn't fit in the full bins. Saw it with my own eyes. They were even checking to see how many bags the customers had already checked, so they had to pay for the excess number of bags. I couldn't believe it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
Alright, let's name names on this one. RyanAir (the usual suspect) wants "£35/€35" for any carry-on bag (you're only allowed one) that is too big (£35 is worth €38, which is $57, so pay in € if you can, and save about $5), but they also restrict bags to "10kg" with maximum dimensions of 55cm x 40cm x 20cm. I just can't see a 737 filling the overheads with only 1 bag per passenger, when each bag weighs less than 22 lbs and is smaller than the standard 'roll aboard' that all US crew know so well.

I've NEVER seen a plane where the bins are full. I've seen plenty where the FAs called 'bins full', and they were, though with crew bags, jackets, and small personal items that could go under seats.

Who, other than RyanAir, would charge for a carry-on that won't fit b/c the bins are full (and do the bins really fill on RyanAir, considering the limits RyanAir puts on carry-on baggage already)?
__________________
America- Where we privatize gains and socialize loses
jonnyjetprop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 08:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
superduck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: A320, Left
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyJSH View Post
Don't want to start the "Fees are good/bad" debate.

All I am asking is since fees started at your company, have people been using more carry-ons? If so, has this affected weight and balance calculations ( are the planes "lighter" on paper for example)?
Back to the original question.

Before the FAA upped the average weight of PAX+carry on from 185 -200lb, the 320 FACs always showed the plane weighed about 2K-6k more than the FAA WAGS. (about 2-5 knots difference in Vapp.

Now the weights are about right. Carry-ons are limited to space. I have not seen any difference in number of checked bags.

Now this is the New York- South Florida crowd, and they are cheap!

Now the New York-San Juan crowd, is another story.

Sometimes 30% gate checks, have people trying to stow motorcycle engines in the overhead, one checked bag set the record at 220lbs and it goes on and on.

The a320 is good, but you don't know what you really weigh until you are airborne.
superduck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 08:42 PM   #14 (permalink)
Ramp Rat
 
ASpilot2be's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left Seat Cessna 172
Posts: 239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post

If anything, the charging for checked bags has meant delays in boarding. On full flight, the gate agents, ground crews, and FAs are busy gate checking bags that were too large or had no space left in the overhead bins. This had led to late departures not to mention some disgruntled passengers.
From the ramp perspective I noticed this too. Here in ANC F9 had the most gate checks on a nightly basis, and it lead to most of our delays.
__________________
Stuck in Anchorage for the summer.
ASpilot2be is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 09:13 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Assistant Puddle Jumper
Posts: 1,184
Default

For we who fly non computerized planes, what is FAC?
__________________
Fly or monitor, I get paid the same.
FlyJSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aerodyamics Question: When lift starts/stops: AZFlyer Hangar Talk 18 08-23-2009 08:27 PM
RAH's Fleet (what its going to look like) JoeyMeatballs Regional 37 06-27-2009 12:54 AM
Fundamental Aircraft Handling Question RVSM Certified Flight Training 22 02-27-2009 01:04 PM
USAir FO suing flight attendants for defamation EmbraerFlyer Major 27 02-02-2009 04:43 PM
Fractional or full ownership of jets? jetsetter44 Corporate 4 08-04-2008 04:52 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7