Pilots helping pilots
View over 100 airline profilesAdd to Google



Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Register FAQ Advertising Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2009, 04:10 PM   #11 (permalink)
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 22
Default

One issue I haven't seen discussed is whether these two pilots have flown together before. Is there a possible (serious) personality conflict -- perhaps there is something on file with the airline that one of the pilots has requested not to be paired with the other. Maybe they were having a blow out argument. Just a thought.
__________________
Clear the Prop
EYELS is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:10 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 1,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
These are 2 of the most ridiculous statements I've ever heard on this board. Stop acting like pilots at your airline aren't guilty of the same thing. Especially you Superdad, since it was your airline. I'm sure DAL-S pilots have never used their laptops in cruise.
Johnso29;

I feel that these guys SHOULD NOT be fired (yes, I said it ... and those who read this can flame away). There are thousands of pilots flying who are able to hide behind their unions and NASA reports -- druggies, drunks, wife beaters, stalkers, completely incompetent aviators ... you name it.

But for the record and I'm sure it happens somewhere within the ranks, I've never seen a DAL-S guy use a laptop in flight. Ever. I think these guys may have been doing so since they fly an Airbus and don't have the yoke in front of them.

This isn't a DAL-S vs. DAL-N flame, so please, don't take it as such.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:12 PM   #13 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 849
Default

I believe revocation lasts 1 year and after that period they can reapply, but have to take all their checkrides again from scratch. Techinically, they will meet all the aeronautical experience requirements for the PVT, COMM and ATP, but must meet regain recency requirements and demonstrate performance standards. It'll cost some bucks.

Getting another job with this on your record won't be as easy..............perhaps a job at Best Buy selling laptops would be in order ?
eaglefly is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:14 PM   #14 (permalink)
Line Holder
 
makoshark72's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 63
Default

I believe they have 10 days to appeal, according to the FAA's rules...

From Newsweek online article...

"Cheney and Cole have 10 days to appeal the revocations to the NTSB, which acts as an independent authority to investigate and adjudicate appeals of license suspensions by the FAA. The pilots can appeal an adverse verdict by an NTSB administrative law judge to members of the NTSB itself, and then appeal further to the courts. The NTSB has expedited procedures to process an appeal of an emergency license revocation within a matter of days."
makoshark72 is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:27 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigGuns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: MD88 FO* *Travel for some itineraries may be provided by Delta Connection:
Posts: 194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
Thats exactly the slippery slope with all of this. There are alot of things that happen that get covered under the ASAP programs and investigated under the appropriate chains of command. However this event didnt get that process because the media took off with this "story". I agree these guys were blatantly ignoring the aircraft and should likely be fired but the FAA pulling their tickets right away just shows that these guys were just made examples of.
The difference between this and the taxiway deal is this would never be accepted into to ASAP. Only events involving the following will be excluded by the Pilot ASAP Event Review Committee (ERC) and will not receive the protective provisions or the enforcement related incentives of the program:
  • Criminal activity
  • Substance abuse
  • Controlled substances
  • Alcohol
  • Intentional falsification
  • Intentional disregard for safety
BigGuns is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:32 PM   #16 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superdad View Post
That's good to see, I wouldn't want my family members flying with those 2 boneheads.
I wouldn't hesitate to let my family fly with them. The union will back these guys 100%. This is far from over. This was a bad mistake that they will regret forever, but I don't believe that these guys should be thrown out like yesterday's garbage. That's all I got to say about that.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:39 PM   #17 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirWillie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfaromeo View Post
I wouldn't hesitate to let my family fly with them. The union will back these guys 100%. This is far from over. This was a bad mistake that they will regret forever, but I don't believe that these guys should be thrown out like yesterday's garbage. That's all I got to say about that.
The union should have their limits and I don't think they'll back them on this one. There are overall harmless things but this is not one of them and it's a serious issue. After this incident, these guys will probably be the most alert crew ever to step foot in a cockpit but that is not the point. They need to be made and example of for the other guys that don't get caught. I'm not saying they should have their licenses taken away but they probably should not step foot in an airline cockpit again.
AirWillie is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:43 PM   #18 (permalink)
Movin on up!!
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: DAL DC9
Posts: 2,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigGuns View Post
The difference between this and the taxiway deal is this would never be accepted into to ASAP. Only events involving the following will be excluded by the Pilot ASAP Event Review Committee (ERC) and will not receive the protective provisions or the enforcement related incentives of the program:
  • Criminal activity
  • Substance abuse
  • Controlled substances
  • Alcohol
  • Intentional falsification
  • Intentional disregard for safety
I agree, but the kicker is that if this had never made the news this MAY have been handled differently. These guys could have filed the asap and said they screwed the pooch by accidentally overflying their destination and upon realizing their mistake they turned back and landed safely. then they likely wouldnt have ever had to mention the laptops (maybe). Point is that this wasnt even given the opportunity to go through the normal process. Instead they were crucified before the real story even came out.

AGAIN-I think they had it coming to them after flying an hour and a half without talking to anyone and being so out of it they completely overflew msp but these guys are definitely being made examples of. My argument isnt really about the punishment these 2 are getting, its about HOW the FAA and the company are completely disregarding the established system we have established.
__________________
NWA
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:44 PM   #19 (permalink)
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: CFI
Posts: 233
Default

I feel bad for the guys. They made a mistake, but they have a whole career on which they should be judged, nit just one flight.
Whacker77 is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:47 PM   #20 (permalink)
On reserve forever
 
flycrj200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Some Beach
Posts: 1,023
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
Thats exactly the slippery slope with all of this. There are alot of things that happen that get covered under the ASAP programs and investigated under the appropriate chains of command. However this event didnt get that process because the media took off with this "story". I agree these guys were blatantly ignoring the aircraft and should likely be fired but the FAA pulling their tickets right away just shows that these guys were just made examples of.
I do not agree with the fact that the FAA pulled their tickets right away, but ASAP does not apply to this situation.
flycrj200 is offline  
Closed Thread



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AA hiding acft in desert? FAA thinks so! corl737 Major 7 09-04-2009 06:41 PM
Aviation subcommittee hearings live Flyby1206 Major 9 06-17-2009 11:23 AM
The Latest Hearing from ALPA.... DWN3GRN Major 18 06-12-2009 05:47 AM
JetBlue Pilots Wakeup call? ERJ135 Major 93 06-07-2009 01:06 PM
Thanks UPS pilots for showing a lot of class and good sportsmanship. B727DRVR Cargo 14 08-22-2008 03:23 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Internet Brands, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7