Quote:
Originally Posted by FastDEW
I am sorry, but this statement makes no sense. Boeing is employing American Workers. Be it in South Carolina or WA. So, the SC employees will be buying the products you speak of (i.e. Retail) instead of the employees in WA. It is a wash.
Another factor is that it is good to have your product manufactured in more than one location. This helps on many levels, the least of which is the WA Boeing plant sits in a major earth quake zone.
Plant diversification and decentralized manufacturing just make sense. Period.
|
I'll grant you the location diversification, or "Not putting all your eggs in one basket." But it isn't a wash...there must be a dollar incentive to move the manufacturing across the country, to a location [as I understand it] that has no experience with Boeing aircraft. So, the total amount of employee compensation (nationwide) will be reduced. Boeing keeps more money in their pocket, despite the moving/training expenses.
To make an airline parallel analogy, what if an airline couldn't reach an agreement with ALPA, so they replaced them / augmented them with guys from a "new domicile/new union?"
Both US corporations
and labor are the reason for this decline in the American way of life. Both sides fight over what they see as their 'fair-share' of the profit margin. Corporations end-run the obstacle by going to new locations, even overseas. Unions try to prove their political relevance by planting their feet and asking for pay/benefits to compensate for previous concessions, even if they are not economically viable. Both sides embrace politicians whom they believe will support their view, even if they have to accept otherwise non-palatable features of that politician. Laws are enacted, but there are always loopholes.
And the cycle continues.
America is living off accumulated wealth...I think we have been doing so for about 15-20 years. Problem is, we aren't re-accumulating it...we're just getting more in debt. We used to be a nation of resources and specialized labor. We peaked on resources about 20 years ago (maybe 30). Aircraft, entertainment, and food were our biggest dollar-exports. The aircraft market has been divided between the US and Europe for 30 years, and now China is entering the fight. We can still make more food than anybody, but our costs are higher, so the export market is limited, and China is trying to cut into our domestic share.
Specialized labor? We import doctors and engineers from India, because the dreams of too many of America's youth are less to do with education, and more about displaying 'bling.' It isn't about what you are, it is what you have in your possession.
That leaves entertainment. When foreign companies own the studios and movie/music rights, you've lost just about everything. Why else would the whole Napster issue been such a big news item? It's about royalties, which is big bucks.
As long as our national policies emphasize corporate profit over national strength, this will continue ad infinitum.
When my parents were in school, they were told that Great Britain was the most powerful nation on earth. Yet after WWII, the US was. They told me that was shocking. I'm sure it was a shock to the Brits as well.
As a boy, there was no doubt in my mind that the US was the best and most powerful on earth. I felt confident it would last forever.
Unfortunately, it seems history really
does have a way of repeating itself.