Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
APA: "New Rules Big Step Backwards" >

APA: "New Rules Big Step Backwards"

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

APA: "New Rules Big Step Backwards"

Old 09-16-2010, 11:27 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default APA: "New Rules Big Step Backwards"

At least one Union gets it and not high fiving this turd.

Allied Pilots Association on Proposed New Flight and Duty Time Rules: 'Any Change Must Enhance Safety' - MarketWatch

VS

"While ALPA looks forward to submitting our full comments to the FAA, the FT/DT Committee offers some initial observations about the proposal. We are very encouraged."

Time to replace the leadership or form a new union.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 11:31 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Phoenix
Posts: 732
Default

wow. New union? Harsh. Maybe new leadership. If you want certain rest requirements, contact your mec and have them put something in the contract. Since when did everyone think the govt was going to save the day?
pilotrob23 is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 11:52 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 354
Default

Finally someone speaks out against these new rules in the public spotlight. The FAA is contradicting their own document in the new proposed rules. I made some examples of the contradictions:

------------
Page 13 says:
"If a person has had significantly less than 8 hours of sleep in the past 24 hours, he or she is more likely to be fatigued."

Proposed Rule:
In the event of unforeseen circumstances, the pilot in command and certificate holder may reduce the 9 consecutive hour rest period in paragraph (d) of this section to 8 consecutive hours.

------------
Page 13:
"A person who has been continually awake more than 17 hours since his or her last major sleep period is more likely to be fatigued."

Proposed Rule:
The maximum reserve duty period for un-augmented operations is the lesser of – (i) 16 hours,

------------
Page 13:
"The longer a person has continuously been doing a job without a break, the more likely he or she is to be fatigued."

Proposed Rule:
Increasing Maximum Flight Time Limits for Un-augmented Operations: 0700-1259 10 hours

------------
Page 14:
"Sleep should not be fragmented with interruptions."

Proposed Rule:
Adding 117.17 Flight duty period: Split duty
mynameisjim is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 11:53 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

I like most of the new rest rule proposals. The one that must NOT make it into the final ruling though, is the rediculous 9-10 hour 2 pilot ETOPS flying. Flying in the lower 48, where you are never more than 10-20 minutes away from a suitable airport simply does not compare to a potential 3 hour ETOPS single pilot situation with oceanic divert procedures and maybe an emergency thrown in. That is quite simply NOT SAFE. All the pilot alphabet groups should be doing some heavy lobbying to make sure that extremely pro-management cost saving item is stripped from the final ruling.
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:00 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer View Post
At least one Union gets it and not high fiving this turd.

Allied Pilots Association on Proposed New Flight and Duty Time Rules: 'Any Change Must Enhance Safety' - MarketWatch

VS

"While ALPA looks forward to submitting our full comments to the FAA, the FT/DT Committee offers some initial observations about the proposal. We are very encouraged."

Time to replace the leadership or form a new union.
Funny, but the article doesn't reflect your title. APA doesn't say the new rules are a big step backwards: they say some of the rules are, while others are positive. Which is pretty obvious to all pilots.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:08 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by pilotrob23 View Post
wow. New union? Harsh. Maybe new leadership. If you want certain rest requirements, contact your mec and have them put something in the contract. Since when did everyone think the govt was going to save the day?
That sounds pretty simplistic. You do realize that everything in a contract has a price tag attached to it. Therefore you are now asking to pay for something that was free previously; ie relief pilot over 8 hours. It reduces your compensation package to keep what the FAR's gave you under the current rules.

ALPA and the goons running the show (No-neck Prater and Rice-a-roni) are too busy upping their playing weight and grooming their mustaches to care about the line pilot.

Oust ALPA and get a real union like the APA. Get a union that is geared to represent your interest versus the RJ laynard wearing union of ALPA.

L
Lambourne is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:08 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Big business at work again with the assistance of their governmental lackeys. Sadly, ALPA has become one of those lackeys. They don't want to rock the boat too hard and destabilize their income which is their primary concern.

U.S. Airline pilots are for the most part chumps (or chimps) and are just getting a slightly riper banana rammed up their backsides. This will do until the next fatigue-related crash (when, not if) and then a new round of finger-pointing will happen until that storm blows over and it's back to business as usual.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:29 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

As long as extreme circadian rhythm shifts are allowed to continue (reducing duty or flight time a few hours after the damage has occurred is not a remedy) this cannot be touted as science based nor safety centric. Call it what it is, an opportunity airline managements used to spot massage more productivity.

Prater is too close to his old friend Babbitt to speak up and say what needs to be said. Hell, are you going to rock the boat when you have a future in consulting and politics. And the rolling over and lack of representation continues.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:49 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Phoenix
Posts: 732
Default

Rj wearing lanyard? Circadian rhythm? Now i understand how this effects the international crews, because that has been talked about a ton on a few of the threads. So, if i am mistaken, and i know there are holes, but the max duty day has been reduced to 13 from 16? And we need 9 hours of rest? Im thinking of the majority of pilots, now rj guys (hope it changes), and low cost carrier pilots, this is a good step. Not great of course. The international 121 heavy pilots in this country is so small. How about the other 80% plus? And paying for somethn in a contract? Like i said, if you want to lean on the govt to take care of you concerning your qol, you already lost. These rest rules have been used for so long. Use your union and payed dues to take care of your contract needs!
pilotrob23 is offline  
Old 09-16-2010, 01:00 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
I like most of the new rest rule proposals. The one that must NOT make it into the final ruling though, is the rediculous 9-10 hour 2 pilot ETOPS flying. Flying in the lower 48, where you are never more than 10-20 minutes away from a suitable airport simply does not compare to a potential 3 hour ETOPS single pilot situation with oceanic divert procedures and maybe an emergency thrown in. That is quite simply NOT SAFE. All the pilot alphabet groups should be doing some heavy lobbying to make sure that extremely pro-management cost saving item is stripped from the final ruling.
Some airlines have contractual obligations to keep 2 pilots under 8 hours, and 3 pilots above 8 hours. Delta is one of those. The contract superceeds the FAA rules in this case. That could be a double wammy for management.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jgg1211
Hangar Talk
31
01-09-2024 09:10 AM
CitationJason
Regional
61
11-22-2019 05:53 PM
Pilot_135
Career Questions
16
05-22-2011 02:13 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
1
07-02-2007 11:16 PM
DON*T HATE ERAU
Regional
26
05-29-2007 08:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices