Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Recall of DAL MEC Officers >

Recall of DAL MEC Officers

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Recall of DAL MEC Officers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2013, 05:06 AM
  #501  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
There was a threat from the guys who had made up their minds and were marching on party lines. It was only after a counter threat to recall all of them that cooler heads prevailed, they started talking, and a mutual agreement was reached.
80KTS,

That might be over stating things a bit.

The Reps did their own work finding consensus and they deserve the credit for their work.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 10-20-2013 at 05:37 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 06:06 AM
  #502  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 132
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy View Post
Eight? Can you list them? Man, if its eight, my math is off. If it is just six, that must mean (GASP!) that it wasn't the NvS issue some people are trying to reframe it as.



Maybe that delineates the difference in thinking between the "two sides". One side thinks that consensus is worthwhile just for consensus' sake (groupthink, if you will) and the other side feels that it's better to vote on the facts and principals as they see them.

I don't see it. I mean, if you need the warm and fuzzy embrace of groupthink to keep you warm at night, then rock on. I'm pretty sure of the kind of folks I rather hang with...the people who can think and act for themselves. I'd rather not hang with people who change their minds depending on which way the wind is blowing.

Nu
You mean that pesky ATL FO Rep who listened to the issues and determined that he had to take his political tilt out of how he voted? Its easy to vote politically but when there is a bigger issue than just politics, the pilots expect and deserve someone to make decisions absent the politics. Its not convenient,but the reality from my conversations with him after the fact.

He also noted that yes, there were innuendoes of how he should vote and the questions and concerns that would be addressed if he voted either way. He took that to be recall, and he said that it was also levied against all ATL Reps not just him. He also was honest enough to state that it came from both sides of the issue not just one side.

On a side note, the Sec and VC both had a lot of votes for recall when there was only one question asked of each of them. Seems to me that the bar for their recall was much lower than some set for the Chairman......
Free Mason is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 06:16 AM
  #503  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Free Mason View Post
You mean that pesky ATL FO Rep who listened to the issues and determined that he had to take his political tilt out of how he voted? Its easy to vote politically but when there is a bigger issue than just politics, the pilots expect and deserve someone to make decisions absent the politics. Its not convenient,but the reality from my conversations with him after the fact.

He also noted that yes, there were innuendoes of how he should vote and the questions and concerns that would be addressed if he voted either way. He took that to be recall, and he said that it was also levied against all ATL Reps not just him. He also was honest enough to state that it came from both sides of the issue not just one side.

On a side note, the Sec and VC both had a lot of votes for recall when there was only one question asked of each of them. Seems to me that the bar for their recall was much lower than some set for the Chairman......
Good post.
slowplay is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 06:26 AM
  #504  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hoserpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: maddoggy dog
Posts: 1,026
Default

Carl,

I'm extremely disappointed in your attack on Nestor. You are flat out wrong. You were not there. I was. I talked to him. Others on here talked to him. Its funny how everyone who took the time to talk one on one with him all say the same thing. Yes there was pressure from BOTH sides. He put politics aside and voted on what he thought would be best for the DELTA pilots. That is what he is charged to do. You have lost credibility the last few days. Seriously.

Dave, thank you for doing what you thought was right. Don't quit, we need pilots like you to do the dirty work that the keyboard warriors won't.
hoserpilot is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 07:20 AM
  #505  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
If the DPA wanted to invest a couple days learning and could hold their members in a coalition of sorts, they could get anything they wanted in ALPA.
..except to get rid of the bloated money pit of a bureaucracy at ALPA national, where a disproportionate amount of our dues money is used to further an agenda oftentimes at odds with Delta pilots' best interests.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 08:00 AM
  #506  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay View Post
Good post.
If you are the unfortunate rep that has the swing vote on a highly charged issue you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. Best have thick skin and not care if you are liked or not and make the call as you see it.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 08:33 AM
  #507  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire View Post
If you are the unfortunate rep that has the swing vote on a highly charged issue you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. Best have thick skin and not care if you are liked or not and make the call as you see it.
How is that the only swing vote? 10/9 means everyone was a swing vote. If you mean roll call then you'd need at least 2 reps or more depending on the base size.
hitimefurl is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 08:59 AM
  #508  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 821
Default

Originally Posted by hitimefurl View Post
How is that the only swing vote? 10/9 means everyone was a swing vote. If you mean roll call then you'd need at least 2 reps or more depending on the base size.
I guess because he was the last one to commit to the recall and those roll call votes were the difference. Following the normal senatorial process it would have just been another vote, in this case it put it at 50 percent plus one and allowed for a roll call majority.

FYI, I am not commenting on whether his vote was right or wrong, only the importance of it and certainly the pressure that was placed upon him.
RonRicco is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 09:06 AM
  #509  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by RonRicco View Post
I guess because he was the last one to commit to the recall and those roll call votes were the difference. Following the normal senatorial process it would have just been another vote, in this case it put it at 50 percent plus one and allowed for a roll call majority.

FYI, I am not commenting on whether his vote was right or wrong, only the importance of it and certainly the pressure that was placed upon him.
How do you know he was last to "commit" and wouldn't the Captain Rep from NY be in as much pressure as he is rumored to have not signed either letter?

All these recall rumors came out the week of the meeting. I've spoken to AG so far and he says they all get recall threats every month from various pilots on both sides of an imaginary fence.
hitimefurl is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 09:26 AM
  #510  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Still in one
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by hitimefurl View Post
How do you know he was last to "commit" and wouldn't the Captain Rep from NY be in as much pressure as he is rumored to have not signed either letter?

All these recall rumors came out the week of the meeting. I've spoken to AG so far and he says they all get recall threats every month from various pilots on both sides of an imaginary fence.
Yes, but they don't often get recall threats orchestrated by their fellow reps if you don't vote a certain way which was the rumor. Also the rumor was that recall of the other reps would be if an attempt to recall Nestor occurred. Since the LEC voted in unison that did not occur and it's all conjecture.
TANSTAAFL is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rogue24
Major
104
06-15-2012 04:49 AM
Redeye Pilot
United
112
11-07-2010 01:31 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices