US cancels TLV, DL 747 diverts to CDG
#21
An update on the crisis posted below, hopefully peace will one day prevail.
"Growing Humanitarian Crisis": Palestinian Toll Tops 650 as Israel Attacks Gaza?s Sole Power Plant | Democracy Now!
"Growing Humanitarian Crisis": Palestinian Toll Tops 650 as Israel Attacks Gaza?s Sole Power Plant | Democracy Now!
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,883
An update on the crisis posted below, hopefully peace will one day prevail.
"Growing Humanitarian Crisis": Palestinian Toll Tops 650 as Israel Attacks Gaza?s Sole Power Plant | Democracy Now!
"Growing Humanitarian Crisis": Palestinian Toll Tops 650 as Israel Attacks Gaza?s Sole Power Plant | Democracy Now!
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
Last edited by ShyGuy; 07-23-2014 at 07:03 PM.
#25
#26
What a one-aided slaughter. The invasion started after hundreds of rockets were fired but only one Israeli was killed. Now it's 32 dead (2 civilian, 30 soldiers, 15% of which friendly fire), versus 650 killed with 460 of those civilian women, children, and men. Weird thing is they invaded because of these rockets that are deadly for Israelis. Yet, when the FAA forbids US airlines from coming into TLV, they say "naw, come on in, those rockets can't hurt you. We shoot them down with our Iron Dome, you aren't in any danger." So it's dangerous when used to justify killing 70% civilians but totally not dangerous when it comes to foreign airliners coming into TLV. The rest of the world has already used the term genocide. Sounds fitting.
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
You say Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians AND wondering why anyone would fly to TLV because Palestinians are targeting the airport (maybe our airliners) with rockets?
So say your neighbor is shooting at your house in the hopes of killing everyone with you, how many people in your house should be killed before you're justified in returning fire in full? More than 1? So 2? Which 2?
#27
What a one-aided slaughter. The invasion started after hundreds of rockets were fired but only one Israeli was killed. Now it's 32 dead (2 civilian, 30 soldiers, 15% of which friendly fire), versus 650 killed with 460 of those civilian women, children, and men. Weird thing is they invaded because of these rockets that are deadly for Israelis. Yet, when the FAA forbids US airlines from coming into TLV, they say "naw, come on in, those rockets can't hurt you. We shoot them down with our Iron Dome, you aren't in any danger." So it's dangerous when used to justify killing 70% civilians but totally not dangerous when it comes to foreign airliners coming into TLV. The rest of the world has already used the term genocide. Sounds fitting.
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
What a one-aided slaughter. The invasion started after hundreds of rockets were fired but only one Israeli was killed. Now it's 32 dead (2 civilian, 30 soldiers, 15% of which friendly fire), versus 650 killed with 460 of those civilian women, children, and men. Weird thing is they invaded because of these rockets that are deadly for Israelis. Yet, when the FAA forbids US airlines from coming into TLV, they say "naw, come on in, those rockets can't hurt you. We shoot them down with our Iron Dome, you aren't in any danger." So it's dangerous when used to justify killing 70% civilians but totally not dangerous when it comes to foreign airliners coming into TLV. The rest of the world has already used the term genocide. Sounds fitting.
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
Is it too much to ask your buddies to stop launching rockets from civilian areas?
#29
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
What a one-aided slaughter. The invasion started after hundreds of rockets were fired but only one Israeli was killed. Now it's 32 dead (2 civilian, 30 soldiers, 15% of which friendly fire), versus 650 killed with 460 of those civilian women, children, and men. Weird thing is they invaded because of these rockets that are deadly for Israelis. Yet, when the FAA forbids US airlines from coming into TLV, they say "naw, come on in, those rockets can't hurt you. We shoot them down with our Iron Dome, you aren't in any danger." So it's dangerous when used to justify killing 70% civilians but totally not dangerous when it comes to foreign airliners coming into TLV. The rest of the world has already used the term genocide. Sounds fitting.
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
In any case, I don't understand why any passenger would want to fly to TLV today. It isn't worth it, the US government has warned against travel there. Oh and Bloomberg's little stunt would actually be credible if it wasn't for the fact he outlaws 32oz fountain drinks. But apparently flying into a war zone is okay. And those citizens can carry guns but not here in NY.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post