Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Official DAL 2015 (No BS) Thread? >

Official DAL 2015 (No BS) Thread?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Official DAL 2015 (No BS) Thread?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2014, 12:05 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DAL Pilot
Posts: 1,133
Default

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer View Post
Or create your own website for delta specific news where people have to post a name instead of an alias to hide behind.
You are asking for something that won't happen on a public forum.
Already done about nine months ago...

www.widgetpilotforums.com

My sign ups have dropped off dramatically and it's been very slow. Get the word out!
Cycle Pilot is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 03:14 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
25-10-10 is structured over 3 years, not 4. There was no way to be as specific as I was in my post. So maybe my post isn't the sort of thing you're looking for on this thread. If so, I'll bow out.
No, this is good. I'm only looking for a place where a lurker might find pro-con ideas on the survey itself, without tangential issues, personal fights, etc.

To answer your question, what I did on the survey was indicated a minimum 25% increase on day one and a minimum total increase of 51%. 25-10-10 is cumulatively 51%, but as you said there was no way for me to be that specific on the survey. I don't remember the exact question numbers or the exact wording of the questions.
OK, so we agree. There is no direct way to state how much you want payrates to increase over the length of the contract, just the initial bump, combined with total compensation increase. Total compensation increase includes benefits, retirements, and workrule improvements, so the answer to #116 must be a lot greater than #24. And we probably have to bump up #24, to account for increases in years 2 and 3.

I'll probably move my answers closer to the numbers you suggest.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 03:19 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
Oh I agree if you free text 10%, that's a bonus for the JV. The meat is in taking way the ability to have the JV.
OK. I'm not sure 10% is really a huge deterrent, but the bottom line is that the survey doesn't any options on how we want a JV handled, just whether it's important to have agreements for future JV's, and how we rank JV's among 10 Scope items.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 06:27 AM
  #14  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
No, this is good. I'm only looking for a place where a lurker might find pro-con ideas on the survey itself, without tangential issues, personal fights, etc.



OK, so we agree. There is no direct way to state how much you want payrates to increase over the length of the contract, just the initial bump, combined with total compensation increase. Total compensation increase includes benefits, retirements, and workrule improvements, so the answer to #116 must be a lot greater than #24. And we probably have to bump up #24, to account for increases in years 2 and 3.

I'll probably move my answers closer to the numbers you suggest.
Good. Glad it helped.

I'd also point out that, because of inflation, a 51% increase over three years is not full restoration. Given the enormous sacrifice we've all made for the past 10 years (I estimate approx. $1 million for each of us that was here during the entire time period), I think what I am proposing is extremely reasonable. The company gets to keep the $1 million "contribution" I made to help them get through a very bad financial crisis... and now just make it right going forward. I'm guessing not many employees would be willing to write off $1 million to help their employer out, right?

Hey, I know the previous paragraph isn't exactly what you're looking for in terms of specific answers to specific questions on the survey... but I think it is a perspective that could be helpful to many as they answer those specific questions.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 06:47 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Unknown
Posts: 38
Default

I would like to add that if the survey doesn't address an issue/idea you might have for a certain section, definitely use the comment area in that section. Under the R&I section, I added that I would like to see an allowance for supplemental health insurance for retirees age 65 and above.
Hixdog is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 05:45 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 938
Default

Originally Posted by Hixdog View Post
I would like to add that if the survey doesn't address an issue/idea you might have for a certain section, definitely use the comment area in that section. Under the R&I section, I added that I would like to see an allowance for supplemental health insurance for retirees age 65 and above.
That's a good one. I was also thinking along the lines of a company provided Long Term Care policy. That could help mitigate some big healthcare expenses down the road in life if you needed it.

I also agree that the use of the text boxes are critical on this survey. I was told that every single comment on every section of the survey will be organized and presented to the MEC after the survey closes. Make the most of all 250 characters in each box. For me personally, I'm completing the survey and keeping it saved. I'll discuss it with those I fly with in search of additional ideas, modify my text boxes if necessary and submit it toward the end of the window.
Hillbilly is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 09:42 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 276
Default

I learned in an earlier life, discussing contract "wants" on a public forum usually hurt contract negotiations. Just food for thought.
thefoxsays is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 10:11 PM
  #18  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

Originally Posted by thefoxsays View Post
I learned in an earlier life, discussing contract "wants" on a public forum usually hurt contract negotiations. Just food for thought.
Please explain and how you saw public discussion really change the course of negotiations.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 09-11-2014, 12:17 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 57
Default

Are there some good pros/cons for the #12 ranking?
Flyinrob is offline  
Old 09-11-2014, 02:09 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
Scope. JV Shorten look back to 6 months and no cure period. 10% pay raise for all if out of compliance and no profit loss sharing during out of compliance period. A little harsh, but certainly no harsher than bending over and the company taking their sweet time with us.

V Atlantic - similar to JV wrt production balance, look back and cure.
Does that not just mean that if the company wants to violate the CBA that they just pay us 10% and walk away? That's a cheap buy out when so many are convinced that Delta wants to outsource it's entire international operation vs the fact Delta says that international capacity is the problem.

You'd sell Section 1 for only 10%? Putting a price (and a low one at that) in the CBA is just a menu for the company to choose when and where to violate the contract because you gave them the cost up front.

If the company has a 5 billion dollar insurance policy, why only ask for 5 million? Unless it's because you already realize they'd never ever ever ever sign a contract that had a financial penalty that is punitive and that the NMB would never make them sign it.
hitimefurl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Codfather
Major
103
02-11-2019 04:40 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
32
05-30-2012 03:51 AM
FIIGMO
Major
120
05-15-2012 07:54 PM
HSLD
Hangar Talk
3
10-12-2007 07:36 PM
smiley
Major
47
06-04-2007 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices