Out of Domicile Open Time pick ups
03-01-2015, 03:59 PM
#51
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: A320
Posts: 58
Originally Posted by Tine
You picked up Opentime and continued to fly well above garuntee with fellow pilots furloughed. You pee all over our contract with regard to anything that benefits you personally. JRM's etc etc etc. NOW you have the Union limit letting your fellow pilots ability to pick up out of base open flying within 48 hours. Then you have the audacity to stage an "informational poll" on a public forum and think no one has the right to call you out on all of your shady crew scheduling deallings? I hope the "poll" that you are conducting is to find out which airline you want to go to work for because, Honey you are a real pleasure to be on the same side of the fence with. Fraud and a Liar 11/21/14
P.S. I wouldnt be sitting by your phone.
P.S. I wouldnt be sitting by your phone.
Kiwi all I can say is I can't wait to upgrade and pick up all my trips in FLL.
03-01-2015, 04:59 PM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: B737 Driver
Posts: 122
Originally Posted by corperalcleg
Greedy and a hypocrite. Brags about how she use to credit 200 hours a month with her shady unlimited JRM. Picks up trips in every base and yet complains about other captains picking up trips in her base.
Kiwi all I can say is I can't wait to upgrade and pick up all my trips in FLL.
Kiwi all I can say is I can't wait to upgrade and pick up all my trips in FLL.
03-01-2015, 05:09 PM
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by Sa227capt
Sounds likes real winner right there. Sorry you have to deal with that kind of BS.
03-02-2015, 10:14 AM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Originally Posted by Tine
No. We are sorry that you have to hear about it here. It's embarrassing. Neds Kids were desperate back in the day. Ask her if I can go to New Zealand and procure said six figure job. I "caaant" because that would be "rude".
My classmates included previous 121 CP's, Corporate Dept managers, FBO owners, etc. Off the top of my head - Out of that class, five of us went on to be union workers. Three MEC Chairmen, One Status Rep, and numerous Committee Chairmen. Some that didn't stay ended up in very short order at CAL, SWA and the FAA. "Desperate" is not the way to describe the environment that hired your fellow pilots. They were looking for people who could survive in a fast paced training environment, who could fly a steam gauge/cable controlled jet, and who were likely to move on in a short period of time. That worked prior to Sept 11. After, during stagnation, we hired tens if not a hundred furloughed pilots from AA, TWA, AAA, etc.
Let's try and keep it real OK?
03-02-2015, 10:23 AM
#55
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Originally Posted by skybolt
I'll have to disagree with the "desperate" comment. NedsKids were not desperate for pilots, they were looking for pilots who would occupy a date in the training environment three times in two years, then move on. This is the way that Ned kept the overall pilot pay down and how his friends, the "Kids" kept their "we're all in the training dept" pay up.
My classmates included previous 121 CP's, Corporate Dept managers, FBO owners, etc. Off the top of my head - Out of that class, five of us went on to be union workers. Three MEC Chairmen, One Status Rep, and numerous Committee Chairmen. Some that didn't stay ended up in very short order at CAL, SWA and the FAA. "Desperate" is not the way to describe the environment that hired your fellow pilots. They were looking for people who could survive in a fast paced training environment, who could fly a steam gauge/cable controlled jet, and who were likely to move on in a short period of time. That worked prior to Sept 11. After, during stagnation, we hired tens if not a hundred furloughed pilots from AA, TWA, AAA, etc.
Let's try and keep it real OK?
My classmates included previous 121 CP's, Corporate Dept managers, FBO owners, etc. Off the top of my head - Out of that class, five of us went on to be union workers. Three MEC Chairmen, One Status Rep, and numerous Committee Chairmen. Some that didn't stay ended up in very short order at CAL, SWA and the FAA. "Desperate" is not the way to describe the environment that hired your fellow pilots. They were looking for people who could survive in a fast paced training environment, who could fly a steam gauge/cable controlled jet, and who were likely to move on in a short period of time. That worked prior to Sept 11. After, during stagnation, we hired tens if not a hundred furloughed pilots from AA, TWA, AAA, etc.
Let's try and keep it real OK?
03-02-2015, 11:07 AM
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Originally Posted by The Juice
Because your message isnt always slanted one way and has been since the 77 election?
List. MmmKk?
And oh, you havent been here long enought to know anything about elections and or my politics. FWIW, I didnt participate in the 77 election and do have a good relationship with the LAS guys.
03-02-2015, 12:32 PM
#57
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Originally Posted by skybolt
Haters just gotta hate. I was defending your fellow crewmembers. You're a Dallas FO, make sure that I'm on your "no fly"
List. MmmKk?
And oh, you havent been here long enought to know anything about elections and or my politics. FWIW, I didnt participate in the 77 election and do have a good relationship with the LAS guys.
List. MmmKk?
And oh, you havent been here long enought to know anything about elections and or my politics. FWIW, I didnt participate in the 77 election and do have a good relationship with the LAS guys.
I disagree with about 90% of your views on here and you do with 90% of mine as well. I don't even mind you discounting my opinion because you don't fee that I have been here long enough.
But I'm sure, almost 100%, that our paths will cross one day in an Airbus cockpit. I don't hide behind no fly lists, be a professional and do the job we are paid to do, as I will always do the same.
Forums have their place for certain things but only an amateur would take forum bravado into a safety sensitive position like a commercial aircraft.
03-02-2015, 01:43 PM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by The Juice
Yeah because I'm going to put someone on a "no fly" list because of a forum.
I disagree with about 90% of your views on here and you do with 90% of mine as well. I don't even mind you discounting my opinion because you don't fee that I have been here long enough.
But I'm sure, almost 100%, that our paths will cross one day in an Airbus cockpit. I don't hide behind no fly lists, be a professional and do the job we are paid to do, as I will always do the same.
Forums have their place for certain things but only an amateur would take forum bravado into a safety sensitive position like a commercial aircraft.
I disagree with about 90% of your views on here and you do with 90% of mine as well. I don't even mind you discounting my opinion because you don't fee that I have been here long enough.
But I'm sure, almost 100%, that our paths will cross one day in an Airbus cockpit. I don't hide behind no fly lists, be a professional and do the job we are paid to do, as I will always do the same.
Forums have their place for certain things but only an amateur would take forum bravado into a safety sensitive position like a commercial aircraft.
Speaking of Mic Drops. Solid
03-02-2015, 02:31 PM
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Originally Posted by The Juice
Yeah because I'm going to put someone on a "no fly" list because of a forum.
I disagree with about 90% of your views on here and you do with 90% of mine as well. I don't even mind you discounting my opinion because you don't fee that I have been here long enough.
But I'm sure, almost 100%, that our paths will cross one day in an Airbus cockpit. I don't hide behind no fly lists, be a professional and do the job we are paid to do, as I will always do the same.
Forums have their place for certain things but only an amateur would take forum bravado into a safety sensitive position like a commercial aircraft.
I disagree with about 90% of your views on here and you do with 90% of mine as well. I don't even mind you discounting my opinion because you don't fee that I have been here long enough.
But I'm sure, almost 100%, that our paths will cross one day in an Airbus cockpit. I don't hide behind no fly lists, be a professional and do the job we are paid to do, as I will always do the same.
Forums have their place for certain things but only an amateur would take forum bravado into a safety sensitive position like a commercial aircraft.
No Sir, seriously put me on your no fly list.
This is about safety.
My post had nothing to do with politics or either of our political views. I was defending a group, a seniority block of pilots if you will, a group who Tine referred to as being hired when Spirit was "desperate". If you have so little regard for me and the pilots hired during my times, us flying together would be a safety issue.
03-02-2015, 03:20 PM
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 123
[QUOTE=skybolt;1835587]No Sir, seriously put me on your no fly list.
This is about safety.
My post had nothing to do with politics or either of our political views. I was defending a group, a seniority block of pilots if you will, a group who Tine referred to as being hired when Spirit was "desperate". If you have so little regard for me and the pilots hired during my times, us flying together would be a safety issue.[/QUOTE
Do you want a participation ribbon or a hug?
This is about safety.
My post had nothing to do with politics or either of our political views. I was defending a group, a seniority block of pilots if you will, a group who Tine referred to as being hired when Spirit was "desperate". If you have so little regard for me and the pilots hired during my times, us flying together would be a safety issue.[/QUOTE
Do you want a participation ribbon or a hug?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
