Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
State Department comment period on Fair Skies >

State Department comment period on Fair Skies

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

State Department comment period on Fair Skies

Old 03-06-2016, 10:52 AM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by UalHvy View Post
Hey....Weren't we encouraged to vote for an administration that was supposed to be on the side of labor? What happened? Looks like the only side they are on is the Middle Eastern one.
Unfortunately, most pilots vote republican, during the 80's the MEC Chair was held by republicans. 75% of the APA political dues went to bush. So you can't fault the democrats for not supporting pilots.
Roundup is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 04:27 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by Roundup View Post
Unfortunately, most pilots vote republican, during the 80's the MEC Chair was held by republicans. 75% of the APA political dues went to bush. So you can't fault the democrats for not supporting pilots.
So, is the Obama Administration (democrat) going to support pilots by rejecting the so-called open skies, or is he just another republican (pretend democrat) pretending to be on the side of labor?

Clinton's NAFTA turned out to be a BUST for labor both in the USA and Canada. Clinton must have forgotten his "labor roots" or just went rogue.
baseball is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 04:35 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
So, is the Obama Administration (democrat) going to support pilots by rejecting the so-called open skies, or is he just another republican (pretend democrat) pretending to be on the side of labor?
Pilots are only a small part of the labor picture. Boeing unions have a very different outlook on ME3 carriers who buy lots of planes. The UAE is also an enormous ally of the US in the Middle East. You should see some of our air bases there. Things are not as simple as we pilots sometimes like to imagine.

What is pretty simple is that one party hates unions.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 07:41 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive View Post
Pilots are only a small part of the labor picture. Boeing unions have a very different outlook on ME3 carriers who buy lots of planes. The UAE is also an enormous ally of the US in the Middle East. You should see some of our air bases there. Things are not as simple as we pilots sometimes like to imagine.

What is pretty simple is that one party hates unions.
As you point out, the economic interest of airline pilots is only one factor the administration must consider. Despite the historic ties between organized labor and the Democratic Party, they may be unable to support us due to foreign policy and other issues. Of course, these "other considerations" may prevent airline pilots from supporting the Democratic Party. It works both ways.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 07:48 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman View Post
Of course, these "other considerations" may prevent airline pilots from supporting the Democratic Party. It works both ways.
Could you please give us all the 'other considerations' for airline pilots to support Republicans?

Last edited by Flytolive; 03-31-2016 at 08:06 AM.
Flytolive is offline  
Old 03-31-2016, 10:29 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hindsight2020's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Center seat, doing loops to music
Posts: 821
Default

When it comes to lack of support for airline pilots, the position is rather non-partisan imo. Neither party supports the best interest of your income leverage. Even the traditional Democratic assumption of labor support is disingenuous when they are the pushers of the middle class killing via NAFTA/CAFTA and TPP. The Republican position is and has been outwardly corporatist from the get-go, so nothing new to report there.

This job will eventually be another casualty of globalization. Me, I tend to write-in my votes on a piecemeal basis. The only thing I can affect is how I position myself financially when the end comes to this job (cabotage, technology obsolescence). Diversifying household income is one way I'm trying to afford life (sending the wife to nursing school), also living below my income, which I recognize it's not palatable to many fraus out there. With the RLA and the public's entitlement to the idea of air transport as a public commodity, airline unions are not real unions anyways. I'm not advocating their dissolution, I think it beats the alternative; I'm merely pointing out their leverage in today's labor environment is weak at best.

I also agree with the other poster regarding retirement. As nice as having a pension is, there's no way I take an IOU from a private employer, ever. B-funds are the only thing I'd take for deferred compensation. Government pensions OTOH are a lot more palatable to me only because stiffing me out of those creates havoc for the entire street, which insulates me. When I'm the only one in the street suffering, as was the case with the airline pension wipes, I can't successfully socialize my loss into political action. I'm a populist that way. Why wouldn't I be? Airline pilot is not a unique skillset the way some on here try to think it is. I'm no trained surgeon, I'm not a price setter. Strength in numbers then.
hindsight2020 is offline  
Old 05-05-2016, 07:26 PM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
So, is the Obama Administration (democrat) going to support pilots by rejecting the so-called open skies, or is he just another republican (pretend democrat) pretending to be on the side of labor?

Clinton's NAFTA turned out to be a BUST for labor both in the USA and Canada. Clinton must have forgotten his "labor roots" or just went rogue.
Your right, pilots as a whole have no representation. The repubs look at us as labor and the democrats know that 75% of pilots vote republican. Their not going to support a so called white collar association.
Roundup is offline  
Old 05-13-2016, 09:28 AM
  #58  
Squawking 2000
 
Winston's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: Skeptical
Posts: 737
Default

FWIW:

https://berniesanders.com/issues/pre...line-industry/

STATEMENT BY SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS: WE MUST PREVENT A GLOBAL RACE TO THE BOTTOM IN THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY

Norwegian Air International’s attempt to undermine international labor laws by outsourcing cheap labor from Thailand and other low-wage countries is unacceptable. The U.S. Department of Transportation should not be rewarding this airline with a foreign air carrier permit that would allow it to undercut the wages and benefits of airline workers throughout this country.

Granting such a permit would be a direct violation of the strong labor provisions included in the U.S./E.U. Open Skies Agreement. Moreover, it would set a dangerous precedent that threatens the jobs of hundreds of thousands of flight attendants, mechanics, pilots and other airline workers in our country and in Europe.

We must do everything we can to prevent a global race to the bottom in the airline industry.

If this permit is approved, it would open the door to the same “flag of convenience” model that decimated U.S. shipping and paved the way for the outsourcing of nearly 100,000 American jobs. We cannot allow that to happen.

The U.S. Department of Transportation should reverse its tentative decision to approve this permit. We should be working to expand, not cut, good paying jobs across both the United States and the European Union. These labor standards were meant to benefit workers in the U.S. and the E.U, not weaken them.
Winston is offline  
Old 06-08-2016, 01:34 PM
  #59  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 96
Default

It's not a case of NAI affecting labor. ALPA is not labor and NAI will bring jobs.
Roundup is offline  
Old 06-09-2016, 06:51 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Roundup View Post
It's not a case of NAI affecting labor. ALPA is not labor and NAI will bring jobs.
ALPA is part of the AFL-CIO and is most definitely labor just not a large dependable voting block. We do however have a very effective and lately bipartisan (pilot-partisan) PAC.

If you don't think NAI is a labor issue google foreign flagging in the merchant marine.

NAI jobs? That's hilarious. Hope you are being compensated for carrying that heavy NAI water.
Flytolive is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cgull
United
127
04-05-2013 03:43 AM
dckozak
Regional
0
11-12-2010 05:03 AM
FredEx
Cargo
54
06-10-2009 11:11 AM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 01:56 PM
Dane Bramage
Major
61
11-01-2006 08:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices