Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Sully movie

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2016, 03:07 PM
  #71  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
Either way, I never mentioned that accident and my reply had nothing to do with it. You made the first reference to it in this entire thread in your last post.
The rule was put in place as a political knee jerk reaction to Colgan. It was based on nothing.
MartinBishop is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 03:11 PM
  #72  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop View Post
The math works out, besides it won't be at that rate for very long.
"Math works out" that you cant afford to pay the loan for a few years and have to live with your parents? No, that math doesnt work out.

I could not imagine having to fly a trip with you. You want to argue anything and everything with everyone. Nightmare
The Juice is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 03:17 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Exclamation ***???

What has this place come to? Eight pages and no one b!tches about the ditching button!

Sad.
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 03:24 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,192
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped View Post

25 years ago to get on with a regional airline, you had to have thousands of hours and in many cases PAY $15,000 or so to get hired. Hiring minimums weren't an issue because no one could come close to TOUCHING a job at a regional without a couple of thousand hours. Then you would be flying a 19 seat turboprop for about $17,000 a year. (My first regional was $9,000 a year). More recently things got out of whack with some 300 hour pilots suddenly finding themselves in the right seat of a regional jet with an ever expanding number of seats. If you found a weak captain, let's say one that had failed 5-6 checkrides, and paired them with one of these inexperienced pilots, you could easily find yourself in a horrible situation. Buffalo. Not good. Experience isn't everything, but it is a critical component to safe operation.

Major airlines are not having trouble filling classes. Occasionally someone won't show up because they accepted another offer, but there are plenty of applicants for the airlines that pay well.

Type less, learn more. Pilots getting into the game now have it better than any group in a generation.

Last question. When you read an accident report, do you think "That moron! I would never do that??" For some perspective, whenever I read an accident report, I think "Man, pay close attention to this because I really don't ever want to do that". That's the best lesson my 16,000+ hours has taught me.
Wasn't even 25 years ago. Late 90's you needed 3000/500 give or take to get looked at by regionals. 1500 hours and an ATP is not an insurmountable hurdle by any stretch, and a 121 cockpit is not the place to be building mins for an AIRLINE transport ticket. Everyone says it's not a pilot shortage, it's a pay shortage. While true you don't get to raise the standards while lowering the bar.
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 03:46 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,061
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop View Post
The rule was put in place as a political knee jerk reaction to Colgan. It was based on nothing.
It wasn't a political knee jerk. If anything, the rest rules were the knee jerk. Neither of the pilots would have been illegal under the current rules. The Captain was a pay-to-play who spent from 250 hours with a wet commercial in the right seat of a large turboprop aircraft. When he was faxed with adversity, he did the exact opposite of what he was trained to do and part of it was his inexperience operating an aircraft under anything other than normal flight conditions.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 03:53 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Default

Originally Posted by 50SeatsofGrey View Post
Is it true he was the most bid avoided CA at L-US?

No. I flew with him for a month.

I've flown with captains that were on par with him professionally, but not many that had the complete package of good airman, good captain and that carried himself as well as him. Hopefully the vast majority of us would have had as successful outcome, I doubt many could have pulled off the PR stuff as well.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 04:20 PM
  #77  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
It wasn't a political knee jerk.
Of course it was. It had zero to do with the incident at hand. Were they sleep deprived and possibly not well trained? Yes. But both pilots were well above 1500TT



Originally Posted by The Juice View Post
"Math works out" that you cant afford to pay the loan for a few years and have to live with your parents? No, that math doesnt work out.
Over the long term, it does work out.
MartinBishop is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 05:40 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: non acceptus excretus
Posts: 561
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop View Post
Of course it was. It had zero to do with the incident at hand. Were they sleep deprived and possibly not well trained? Yes. But both pilots were well above 1500TT



Over the long term, it does work out.
The concept of having more than 1500 TT BEFORE you begin with a scheduled point A to point B operator of a "carrying travelling public" situation is what you seem to not comprehend. There is a solidification of hands on flying skills that was missing in the accidents and incidents of the post 2000 regional industry. The "puppy mill pilots" are legend within the industry, as much as you advocate for them you only diminish your credibility on this forum. We have seen the good, the bad, and the ugly. The 1500 hour rule is inconvenient for you since you started your attempt at an airline career late in life. But the 1500 hour rule has ample justification or more likely mandate. You just don't like it because it is in your way. Get a CFI and instruct until you meet the 1500 hrs and you will be a better pilot than if you just went to the Gulfstream Academy and got the "puppy mill certificate"..And that goes for down the road when you have 5,000 + hours hours and have been at that regional or "real airline" for a while.m, Fortunately the "puppy mill option" no longer exists.
Molon Labe is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 05:43 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop View Post
But both pilots were well above 1500TT


Over the long term, it does work out.
This is a perfect example of how little you really understand about this industry.

What you don't seem to get is that airline flying doesn't build the basic foundational skill set every pilot requires. Those need to be well established before you ever set foot on the company property. You can't get them flying an airliner. Whatever you show up with is what you got. Your stick and rudder skills aren't going to magically improve when you spend most of the flight with the autopilot on and hand fly for a few minutes every other flight. Muscle memory and stick/rudder reflexes, cross-check, habit patterns, etc. all get ingrained as you gain experience prior to the airlines.

The Colgan captain didn't fire-wall his throttles and he pulled back on the yoke during a stall because he never had those skills in the first place. He probably would have done the same thing after another 5000 hours of mundane, autopilot airline flying. So, the fact that he had more than 1500 hours of flying when he crashed is irrelevant. How many hours he had and what his skills/experience was when he took that job in the first place is.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 07-01-2016, 05:53 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,061
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop View Post
Of course it was. It had zero to do with the incident at hand. Were they sleep deprived and possibly not well trained? Yes. But both pilots were well above 1500TT



Over the long term, it does work out.
Total time at time of accident has almost literally nothing to with skill. Even the RAA argues that not all flying is created equal. It is vitally important to give yourself a chance to make mistakes. If you go from being with an instructor to being in the right seat of an airplane flying passengers, many argue that you never fully and adequately get to make mistakes, ones that scare you. The Asiana crew that put a 777 into the rocks at SFO had over ten thousand hours combined and yet one of the reasons why they crashed that airplane was partially because very few of those ten thousand hours was actually flying an airplane.

Last edited by CBreezy; 07-01-2016 at 06:29 PM.
CBreezy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Grumble
Major
10
11-11-2010 11:30 AM
CRM1337
Hangar Talk
0
01-23-2006 01:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices