Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Retirement Age Change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2016, 11:53 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

Worrying about an airline rumor stopped being a part of my time years ago.
labbats is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 12:16 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 33
Default

Originally Posted by labbats View Post
Worrying about an airline rumor stopped being a part of my time years ago.
Good idea about not worrying. Unfortunately this appears that it is not a rumor.

Call your reps. They really know that this is being discussed on a global scale (an ICAO adopted standard worldwide with the FAA conforming), but since it's premature to talk about the details, nothing will be formally announced. This includes mention of it from ALPA National.
Toedrag is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 01:38 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 201
Default

Originally Posted by PapaGeorgio View Post
Who still wants to be in this industry and not retired by 60 anyway?.
Judging by the numbers who stay after 60 today apparently a lot. Nothing stops a person from retiring whenever they want to.
AC560 is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 03:41 PM
  #14  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,505
Default

It took a literal act of Congress to change the retirement age in 2007.

Rumors are rumors, but until a bill is proposed in DC or a NPRM is issued, stop worrying...
BoilerUP is online now  
Old 07-21-2016, 03:47 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by OCCP View Post
I hope not. We've been hearing about age 67 ever since age 65 happened. All we need is more old guys clogging up the system. I wish we could go back to age 60.
Give me back my pension and I'll retire at 60 or earlier.
Glenntilton is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 03:49 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by Glenntilton View Post
Give me back my pension and I'll retire at 60 or earlier.
Was your Golden Parachute not enough, Glenn Tilton ???

Sandhawk is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 03:50 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by Sandhawk View Post
Was your Golden Parachute not enough, Glenn Tilton ???

It is never enough.
Glenntilton is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 05:36 PM
  #18  
Not on Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Seat 0A
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by Toedrag View Post
Good idea about not worrying. Unfortunately this appears that it is not a rumor.

Call your reps. They really know that this is being discussed on a global scale (an ICAO adopted standard worldwide with the FAA conforming), but since it's premature to talk about the details, nothing will be formally announced. This includes mention of it from ALPA National.

Not a rumor according to who?

Like others have said, it has been talked about for over 5 years now. My reps only hear whispers from those who heard it from a friend who knows a guy that knows Ferris.

Don't lose any sleep over it. Everyone made it through the 60 to 65 change, and you will be ok through this (if it shows up) also.

If you don't like ups and downs, stay out of this business.
azdryheat is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 05:44 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,383
Default

Originally Posted by SpankysLadder View Post
Redeyes are hell on old pilots. Flew one with a 64 yr old and he was really struggling. Felt really bad for the guy. Airline schedules are no cake walk. Which is why extending the rule is a very bad idea.



Ever notice how the grandparents pass out on the couch midafternoon while the grandkids play on the floor.



I know a lot of well qualified regional pilots who are in their late 40s to early 50s and they can't get a legacy interview. Meanwhile, the ankle biters with no turbine PIC time are getting hired. I keep hearing that the legacies would rather hire the ****ants because they're easier to train. It's ironic how the Feds are trying to keep older pilots around longer when it appears that the legacies are shying away from them!


I'm 44 and think red eyes suck. They should be banned actually. A good ole VNY-TEB my head is bobbin' around JOT somewhere. More dangerous than sleep apnea actually.
Learflyer is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 06:21 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
Default

So funny thing. I just renewed my medical today and talked to my AME about the FAA raising the age to 67 or higher... My doc said that it has been talked about, however he doesn't think the age will ever be raised much over 67 in the US. While healthcare here is advancing, the advancements aren't outpacing the rapid overall decline in American's health. Obesity and diabetes rates are through the roof along with heart and liver issues. The statistics have shown that even if the retirement age is raised, it doesn't mean that pilots will keep being able to hold a medical. Not to mention the airlines don't want to keep paying top end wages any more than they already have to.
chrisreedrules is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Albief15
Cargo
69
07-03-2015 09:59 AM
Busboy
Cargo
110
09-18-2007 05:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices